Are Your Salespeople in the Wrong Roles? How to Match Talent to Revenue Growth
Kevin Lawson and Sean O'Shaughnessy argue that misaligned sales roles—not poor motivation or talent—are a root cause of underperformance. Using sports analogies, they break down archetypes like hunters, farmers, lone wolves, challengers, and trappers, and explain why matching the right seller type to the right business model is essential for revenue growth. They also discuss how sales leaders can audit and restructure teams without wholesale turnover.
Summary
The episode opens with a basketball analogy to introduce the concept of positional roles in sales. Just as basketball positions like point guard or center carry specific responsibilities that cannot be interchanged without consequence, sales archetypes—hunter, farmer, lone wolf, challenger, trapper—each bring distinct strengths and limitations that must be understood by sales leaders before staffing decisions are made.
Kevin Lawson emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the type of seller and the business model the company operates under. In highly transactional or subscription-based businesses, a farmer or customer service-oriented seller may be the right fit, while an outbound enterprise sales motion demands a hunter. He uses his background selling construction wholesale supplies to illustrate how commodity pricing dynamics can undercut even strong relationships, and how hunters risk burning out in highly relational sales environments if they lack support infrastructure.
Sean O'Shaughnessy builds on this by walking through specific archetypes and the conditions that call for each. He notes that if a product is sold once and never again—like an ERP system—a hunter is appropriate because the relationship is inherently short-lived. Farmers, by contrast, thrive in repeat-purchase environments where long-term relationship maintenance drives revenue. He also addresses lone wolves, describing them as effective in organizations that provide little support infrastructure, and challengers as suited for complex, consultative sales cycles. Sean introduces the concept of the 'trapper'—a seller who can execute across all phases of an enterprise deal, from initial hunting through long-term expansion—as the most complete and difficult-to-find archetype.
Both hosts converge on a central warning for sales leaders: forcing one type of seller into a role designed for another is a structural failure, not a talent failure. Kevin points out that people with call reluctance are often miscast in roles requiring heavy prospecting, and that compensation plans must be aligned to the actual role being performed—account managers and customer service reps should not be compensated like account executives charged with closing new logos.
On the question of fixing a misaligned team without mass turnover, Kevin advocates for upskilling over firing, encouraging leaders to identify behavioral signals—like lone wolves treating customers as personal assets rather than company assets—and address them through coaching, process design, and role clarification. Sean adds that hunters who avoid prospecting likely do so because they were never taught how, not because they are incapable, and that making prospecting goal-oriented and gamified can help bridge the gap.
The episode closes with Sean framing the ideal salesperson as one who can execute proactively across a long sales cycle—planting seeds through pilot projects and working up to enterprise-level deals—and encourages listeners to audit their teams against the actual sales motion their business requires.
Key Insights
- Kevin argues that confusing a seller's personality type with the company's business model is a primary source of misalignment—a hunter placed in a highly relational business without account management support is structurally set up to fail, not personally deficient.
- Sean contends that lone wolves are not inherently problematic; they are actually well-suited to organizations that intentionally provide little infrastructure or support, meaning the issue arises only when they are placed in collaborative or process-heavy environments.
- Kevin argues that people with call reluctance are frequently not motivation problems but role-fit problems—they are often farmers or account managers who have been miscast as hunters and are avoiding tasks that were never their natural strength.
- Sean claims that hunters who resist prospecting typically lack the skill rather than the will, and that the organizations that graded them only on closed deals—never on relationship retention—are responsible for allowing that skill gap to persist.
- Kevin asserts that compensation plans that fail to differentiate between account executives hunting new logos and account managers retaining existing customers create misaligned incentives that reward the wrong behaviors and undermine both functions.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access