DiscussionResearch

Meb 654 Dirk

The Meb Faber Show - Better Investing46m 55s

Dirk Willer from Citi discusses the current AI-driven market bubble, defining it as an asset rising more than two standard deviations above its long-term trend. He believes we're in bubble territory but argues this is not a reason to be bearish—rather, investors should avoid over-leverage and recognize that bubbles eventually give back gains. Looking ahead, Willer expects the bubble to persist through 2024, with the Fed's hiking cycle and equity market peak timing being critical to monitor.

Summary

In this macro-focused interview, Dirk Willer, Head of Global Macro Asset Allocation at Citi, provides a comprehensive analysis of current market conditions, asset valuations, and geopolitical risks. He begins by defining bubbles using a quantitative, price-based approach rather than valuation metrics—specifically, when an asset moves more than two standard deviations above its long-term trend in real terms. Using this definition, Willer concludes that markets entered bubble territory in mid-2023, though he emphasizes this doesn't necessitate a bearish stance. Instead, he argues that while bubbles inevitably "give back a fair chunk of money," the timing and extent of drawdowns remain unpredictable.

Willer explains the critical distinction between bubbles and bull markets: bubbles feature concentrated breadth (narrow leadership), unsustainable earnings projections, and eventual mean reversion, whereas traditional bull markets maintain broader participation. He introduces the "Generals Indicator"—tracking the top seven S&P 500 names—as an early warning system; when four of these leaders break their 200-day moving averages while the overall market remains in bubble mode, it signals potential exit points before broader deterioration occurs.

Regarding Federal Reserve policy, Willer develops the "Waller Shadow Rate," a proprietary indicator tracking indicators the Fed Chair has indicated he monitors. He finds this correlates closely with actual Fed funds rates, suggesting Powell maintains a hawkish bias despite recent dovish commentary. Crucially, Willer notes that the first Fed hike is typically not problematic for equities, but the last one is—and markets don't know when the last hike occurs until the Fed signals dovishness during its implementation.

On equity market structure, Willer emphasizes that sector rotation from technology to defensives (utilities, staples) typically occurs after the bubble peaks, not before. This means investors skeptical of tech face limited alternative positions without accepting bonds or defensives. He notes strong seasonality in November-December, historically even stronger in up years, though October typically brings 5% pullbacks into midterm elections before year-end rallies.

Willer addresses the puzzling resilience of equities despite rising rates, attributing this to the market's focus on growth and real rate expectations rather than nominal rate levels. He argues that move index (Treasury volatility) matters more than absolute rate levels for equity performance. The Treasury Secretary's interventions to stabilize the long end appear ineffective when implemented amid orderly market conditions; Willer suggests the November refinancing statement could reveal more strategic shifts toward T-bills and shorter duration.

On fixed income, Willer advocates for extreme patience before buying bonds. His rule of thumb: sell bonds six months before the first Fed hike, buy them back when only one hike remains. He applies this conservatively, suggesting the Fed likely has multiple hikes ahead despite recent market pricing. However, he identifies attractive real yields (3.3% in 30-year TIPS) for very long-term investors anticipating equity market setbacks within five years. He emphasizes that when the equity bubble bursts, the resulting recession would trigger aggressive Fed rate cuts and potential quantitative easing of the long end—making bonds valuable hedges despite near-term rate headwinds.

Geographically, Willer expresses bullishness on Brazil following the recent election of a market-friendly government, citing idiosyncratic fiscal reform potential, deregulation prospects, and extreme real interest rates (9-10%) ripe for cuts. He notes that Brazilian market sentiment remains pessimistic after 18 years of zero total returns, creating mechanical potential for mean-reversion and potential currency appreciation alongside equity gains.

For Asia, Willer remains positive on Taiwan and South Korea as AI beneficiaries but cautions that these don't diversify US equity exposure. Korea specifically saw retail investors pile in with leverage, leading to 80%-in-a-quarter rallies followed by sharp reversals; cleaner positioning would improve entry points. China presents a persistent puzzle: impressive product innovation and competitive AI, yet equity market indices decouple entirely from GDP growth due to factors like competitive intensity, state intervention, and shareholder-unfriendly policies. China's export boom masks weak domestic demand, though European pushback on exports creates near-term headwinds.

Willer expresses caution on Europe given its lack of AI exposure, vulnerability to energy shocks, potential ECB over-tightening, and a strengthening dollar headwind. The euro remains extremely oversold despite the dollar bullish bias.

On commodities, Willer argues that short-term gold performance trades almost exclusively with two-year US rates, making it unattractive while the Fed maintains hawkish positioning. However, he identifies a major structural bull case: central banks' diversification away from dollar holdings, particularly China's potential gold purchases to reduce dollar reserves. Gold should peak when the PBOC finishes buying. Copper remains a valid business cycle indicator; Willer's global data momentum index shows positive correlation with copper returns, and current improving global data (including Europe) supports copper strength, though a stronger dollar limits upside versus scenarios combining growth momentum with currency weakness.

Willer identifies bonds as the most underrepresented and disliked asset class currently. Despite widespread negative sentiment and abandonment, he sees potential mean reversion, particularly given bonds' historical role as crisis hedges in deflationary scenarios. He distinguishes between TIPS (higher Sharpe ratio, less volatile) and nominal bonds, advising TIPS ownership for buy-and-hold investors but cautioning that both perform poorly when the Fed hikes in response to stagflation.

Looking forward to 2024, Willer's base case assumes the bubble persists. He dedicates 80% of analytical effort to timing the equity market peak, as this single event would trigger Fed reversal, rate cuts potentially returning to zero, quantitative easing of long-duration assets, and a gold rally. Simultaneously, he expects Fed hiking cycles elsewhere to end, Iran tensions to resolve (pushing oil toward $70), and central banks globally to pivot to easing—all creating a major rotation in commodity preferences and bond attractiveness despite ongoing equity strength.

Willer reflects on memorable calls, highlighting the 2002 Lula election in Brazil. He emphasizes that the market correctly price-discounted political risk ex-ante; upon Lula's election and policy pivot toward centrist fiscal orthodoxy, the Real strengthened sharply. Critically, he notes the S&P also rallied simultaneously, suggesting global market forces (70% of EM movement) overwhelmed idiosyncratic stories—a pattern he generalizes across macro trading opportunities.

About this episode

Meb 654 Dirk

Key Insights

  • Willer defines bubbles quantitatively (>2 standard deviations above long-term real trend) rather than by valuation, and argues this price-based definition captures earnings bubbles and booking surges that valuation metrics miss
  • The Fed's first rate hike typically doesn't harm equities, but the last hike does—and the market cannot identify the last hike until the Fed signals dovishness during implementation, making pre-emptive positioning difficult
  • Sector rotation from technology to defensives (utilities, staples) occurs after the bubble peaks rather than before, meaning investors bearish on tech have limited positive positions available outside of bonds or beaten-down defensive sectors
  • Market strength despite rising rates reflects investor focus on growth and real rate expectations rather than absolute nominal rate levels; Treasury volatility (move index) matters more for equities than rate levels themselves
  • Brazil's 18-year period of zero equity returns has created pessimistic sentiment among investors despite a new market-friendly government pursuing fiscal reform, creating mechanical potential for mean reversion and currency appreciation
  • Central banks' structural need to diversify away from dollar holdings by purchasing gold (as Putin did during sanctions) suggests a long-term bull case for gold, with the PBOC's buying patterns a critical indicator for gold peak timing
  • Emerging markets are dominated by global cycle dynamics (approximately 70% of performance drivers), so when idiosyncratic stories conflict with global market reversals, the global cycle overwhelms local narratives
  • Long-term bond investors should wait until the Fed has implemented multiple hikes and signals only one remains before buying, not based on absolute valuation; however, when equities bubble bursts, resulting recessions will force Fed rate cuts back toward zero and quantitative easing

Topics

Bubble definition and detection methodologyFederal Reserve policy and the Waller Shadow RateEquity market leadership and sector rotation timingFixed income valuation and bond market sentimentEmerging markets and currency analysisCommodities (gold, copper, oil) and macro indicatorsBrazil election and fiscal policy impactChina equity market disconnection from GDP growthAsian markets (Taiwan, South Korea) and AI exposureEuropean economic headwinds and ECB policy

Transcript

US markets near all-time highs, a lot of AI bubble talk, bubble talk in general. How do you define one? Are we in one? We entered bubble territory roughly middle of last year. Our punchline really is, guys, it's great, it's a bubble, let's buy it. What's the difference between a bubble and a bull market? You tell them it's a bubble, let's buy it. And the difference is that you give back a fair chunk of the money that you make while you're in a bubble. In 2000, the market cap of the equity market was a bit more than 100% of GDP and the bursting bubble gave you a recession. It was a shadow recession, but it was…

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

More from The Meb Faber Show - Better Investing

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.