why your ads are performing like sh*t
The speaker argues that ad performance depends on alignment between ad creative and funnel stage, not on which funnel type is inherently superior. Ads that do less selling require longer funnels to bridge the awareness gap. The match between awareness level in the ad and the funnel destination is the critical factor.
Summary
The speaker opens by addressing a common debate among advertisers: whether to send traffic to a product detail page (PDP), advertorial, or quiz. Rather than declaring one option superior, the speaker argues the real determinant of success is alignment between the ad creative and the funnel destination.
The speaker uses two contrasting ad types to illustrate this point. A native static ad with short-form copy and high curiosity is described as very top-of-funnel, leaving the viewer only 'solution aware.' In contrast, a UGC ad tends to be 'product aware' or even 'most aware' in nature, doing much of the selling work within the creative itself.
From this, the speaker derives a core principle: ads that do less selling in the creative require a longer, more involved funnel to complete the conversion journey. A native static ad should therefore flow into an advertorial — which moves the prospect from solution-aware to product-aware — before arriving at a PDP, and then finally to checkout. Sending a low-awareness ad directly to a PDP is described as a fundamental mismatch, likened to 'slapping someone in the face' with a product before they even realize they're being sold to.
The speaker concludes that the reason certain funnels scale exceptionally well — such as native static paired with an advertorial — is because the awareness levels of each stage are in harmony. No single funnel type is universally better; the optimal choice is entirely dependent on the awareness level implied by the ad creative driving traffic to it.
Key Insights
- The speaker argues there is no universally best funnel destination — only the one that has the best alignment with the awareness level established by the ad creative.
- The speaker contends that native static ads with short-form curiosity-driven copy leave the prospect only 'solution aware,' meaning the funnel must carry them through product awareness and most-aware stages before purchase.
- The speaker states that ads doing less selling in the creative require a longer funnel architecture — such as going through an advertorial before the PDP — rather than sending traffic directly to a product page.
- The speaker explains that sending a top-of-funnel native static ad directly to a PDP fails because the prospect is not yet aware they are being sold to, making an immediate product pitch a jarring and unconverting experience.
- The speaker identifies native static paired with an advertorial as a highly scalable funnel combination, arguing its success is due to both elements sharing the same level of awareness — making them, in his words, 'a match made in heaven.'
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] Should I run ads to a PDP? Should I run ads to an advertorial? Should I go to a quiz? What is the best option? The truth is, there is no best option. There's only what has the best alignment. So, let's say you run ads that are very, very top of funnel, like native statics, very high curiosity with short-form copy. And the CTA here is to read the article. You just kind of tease the mechanism, tease the story a little bit. At this stage, you're only solution aware, nowhere near product aware. Now, if I were to run a UGC ad, that is going [0:32] to be a product aware ad at most. In fact, it…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Mark Builds Brands
How to create S tier winners
To create S tier creatives, it's essential to understand your customer deeply and to analyze existing winning ads to identify effective variables that can be combined into new concepts. This iterative testing approach allows marketers to refine their creatives using insights gained from lower-tier ads.
AI is not the problem, your skillset is
The speaker emphasizes that limitations in utilizing AI stem from individuals' skillsets rather than the capabilities of AI itself. They argue that by effectively communicating and solving problems with AI, anyone can leverage its potential to build innovative solutions.
why you need to remove metadata from AI ads
The speaker argues that removing metadata from AI ads reduces CPM and alleviates concerns about performance issues related to AI. It is quick and easy to implement, making it a practical decision for advertisers.
why your facebook CPMs are so high
High Facebook CPMs are influenced by multiple variables including creatives, landing page design, geographic targeting, and account spend history. The speaker recommends a systematic testing approach to isolate which factor is the primary driver of elevated costs.
the least important part of ecom when getting started
The speaker argues that branding is overemphasized by new e-commerce entrepreneurs and should not be a priority until reaching $300K+ monthly revenue. Instead, early-stage businesses should focus exclusively on finding winning products, converting ads, and profitable funnels.