how to make ads that actually print
The speaker identifies two critical mistakes in native static ad campaigns: treating ads like content and overestimating creative importance. For native statics, copy is the primary persuasion tool, and most advertisers fail by not testing enough variations and using poor funnel architecture.
Summary
The speaker contrasts the distinct nature of good content versus good ads, positioning this differentiation as mistake number one that most advertisers make. The second major mistake involves misunderstanding the role of creative in native static advertising. Unlike video ads where the creative itself (video, script, production) serves as the copy, native static ads rely heavily on written copy to persuade and drive conversions. The speaker emphasizes that copy is 'king' in static ad formats, whereas with video ads, copy is relatively unimportant since the visual production carries the persuasive weight. The speaker identifies two key execution gaps: most advertisers running native statics are not testing enough copy variations, which is the real lever for performance, and they are not implementing proper funnel architecture—either not using good structures at all or using suboptimal versions.
Key Insights
- There is a fundamental difference between good content and good ads, and confusing the two represents a primary mistake advertisers make
- In native static ads, copy is the primary persuasion mechanism, whereas in video ads the creative production itself (video, script, production) functions as the copy
- Most advertisers underestimate the importance of copy testing with native statics and fail to test enough copy variations
- Proper funnel architecture is essential for native static ad performance, yet most advertisers either lack good funnel structures or implement poor versions
- The creative is not king in native static advertising despite being a common assumption among advertisers
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] There's a difference between good content and good ads. That's probably the mistake that you're making number one. The second mistake that you're probably making with winning statics is that you're assuming that the creative is king. It ain't, especially with [ __ ] native statics, copy is [ __ ] king. Like with video ads, copy is a drop in the [ __ ] bucket. It barely even matters for video ads because the creative is technically the copy, the video, the script, the production. That really is the copy. But with native statics, just a static image. So, the real way to persuade people to get them to buy is through your copy. Most of you running…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Mark Builds Brands
the ad styles that actually print
The speaker discusses which ad formats perform well across markets, highlighting native statics, AI animation, and UGC as generally effective options. However, success ultimately depends on testing and understanding your specific target demographic's native content consumption patterns.
How to structure your post purchase upsell
Effective post-purchase upsell (OTO) pages require connecting the main product to complementary products by addressing customer needs strategically. Two proven frameworks are offering more of the same product at a discount, or creating an OTO 1 that solves a new problem created by the front-end product.
how to turn 1 winning ad into 30 variations
The key to scaling ad creative isn't finding one winning ad, but rather identifying the winning sales message behind it and then transmuting that message across multiple formats and variations. A single winning VSL can generate 30+ testable ad variations by extracting core variables and adapting them across different creative formats.
ABO vs CBO for creative testing, which is better?
The speaker discusses CBO (Campaign Budget Optimization) challenges in creative testing, recommending a minimum allocation of $50 per day per ad to prevent budget spreading. They explain that budget must scale proportionally with new ad sets, and suggest moving to ABO (Ad Set Budget Optimization) if managing too many ads becomes problematic.
how to create ads that don't look like ads
Creating ads that don't look like ads requires understanding your specific market's organic content preferences rather than defaulting to generic formats. Research your target audience's feed to identify which content formats—whether native static, podcast clips, or street interviews—actually perform well and drive conversions in that particular market.