How to structure your post purchase upsell
Effective post-purchase upsell (OTO) pages require connecting the main product to complementary products by addressing customer needs strategically. Two proven frameworks are offering more of the same product at a discount, or creating an OTO 1 that solves a new problem created by the front-end product.
Summary
The speaker explains that structuring a successful post-purchase upsell page goes beyond simply listing complementary products. The key is to establish a meaningful connection between the problem the main product solves and the complementary product being offered as OTO 1.
Two primary frameworks are presented for structuring OTO offerings. The first framework is "more of the same," which works particularly well for supplement brands where customers purchase additional units of the same product at a reduced price. This approach is effective for health and wellness products because they typically require time to show results, making it easy to position a bulk purchase as necessary for achieving desired outcomes.
The second, more sophisticated framework involves positioning the OTO 1 product to solve a new problem created by the front-end product. The speaker emphasizes that a front-end product should accomplish two things simultaneously: solve the customer's main problem while simultaneously creating a secondary problem that needs addressing. The weight loss supplement example illustrates this concept—the primary product solves weight loss, but creates a new problem: maintaining the weight loss. The OTO 1 would then logically address weight maintenance.
Key Insights
- The speaker argues that effective OTO pages require connecting the gap between the main product's core problem-solving function and the complementary product being upsold, rather than simply listing complementary items
- The 'more of the same' framework works particularly well for supplement brands because these products require time to demonstrate results, making the positioning for bulk purchase straightforward
- The speaker claims that front-end products should be designed to accomplish two simultaneous objectives: solving the customer's main problem while also creating a new problem that requires solving
- The weight loss supplement example demonstrates that when a primary product solves weight loss, it inherently creates a secondary problem of weight maintenance that can be addressed by OTO 1
- The speaker positions problem-creation as a deliberate, intentional design strategy for front-end products rather than an accidental byproduct, enabling natural OTO upsell opportunities
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] The most important thing for having a well-structured OTO page is not just like complimentary products. It goes much deeper than that. That's relatively surface level. Instead, what you should think about is how can I properly connect the gap between the problem that my main product is aiming to solve and the complimentary product that I'm aiming to sell as OTO 1. So, I'll give you two frameworks. Number one is very simple. It's just more of the same. This works really, really well with supplement brands, for example, where if you buy one particular bottle, the very first OTO can be just more bottles for a good fraction of the price. This is great, especially for health…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Mark Builds Brands
how to turn 1 winning ad into 30 variations
The key to scaling ad creative isn't finding one winning ad, but rather identifying the winning sales message behind it and then transmuting that message across multiple formats and variations. A single winning VSL can generate 30+ testable ad variations by extracting core variables and adapting them across different creative formats.
ABO vs CBO for creative testing, which is better?
The speaker discusses CBO (Campaign Budget Optimization) challenges in creative testing, recommending a minimum allocation of $50 per day per ad to prevent budget spreading. They explain that budget must scale proportionally with new ad sets, and suggest moving to ABO (Ad Set Budget Optimization) if managing too many ads becomes problematic.
how to create ads that don't look like ads
Creating ads that don't look like ads requires understanding your specific market's organic content preferences rather than defaulting to generic formats. Research your target audience's feed to identify which content formats—whether native static, podcast clips, or street interviews—actually perform well and drive conversions in that particular market.
the media buying structure that prints like a mf
The speaker explains their media buying structure for creative testing, recommending ABOs (Ad Set Budget Optimization) over CBOs (Campaign Budget Optimization) because CBOs require constant daily budget increases to accommodate new ad sets, which creates allocation conflicts between testing and winning creatives.
why people hit checkout and still don’t buy
The speaker addresses why customers reach checkout but don't complete purchases, identifying two primary culprits: incorrect ad conversion optimization (tracking the wrong events like add-to-cart instead of purchases) or broken checkout functionality. Diagnosing the issue requires analyzing the drop-off point between initiating and reaching checkout to determine if the problem stems from ads/traffic or payment processing.