How to structure your post purchase upsell
Effective post-purchase upsell (OTO) pages require connecting the main product to complementary products by addressing customer needs strategically. Two proven frameworks are offering more of the same product at a discount, or creating an OTO 1 that solves a new problem created by the front-end product.
Summary
The speaker explains that structuring a successful post-purchase upsell page goes beyond simply listing complementary products. The key is to establish a meaningful connection between the problem the main product solves and the complementary product being offered as OTO 1.
Two primary frameworks are presented for structuring OTO offerings. The first framework is "more of the same," which works particularly well for supplement brands where customers purchase additional units of the same product at a reduced price. This approach is effective for health and wellness products because they typically require time to show results, making it easy to position a bulk purchase as necessary for achieving desired outcomes.
The second, more sophisticated framework involves positioning the OTO 1 product to solve a new problem created by the front-end product. The speaker emphasizes that a front-end product should accomplish two things simultaneously: solve the customer's main problem while simultaneously creating a secondary problem that needs addressing. The weight loss supplement example illustrates this concept—the primary product solves weight loss, but creates a new problem: maintaining the weight loss. The OTO 1 would then logically address weight maintenance.
Key Insights
- The speaker argues that effective OTO pages require connecting the gap between the main product's core problem-solving function and the complementary product being upsold, rather than simply listing complementary items
- The 'more of the same' framework works particularly well for supplement brands because these products require time to demonstrate results, making the positioning for bulk purchase straightforward
- The speaker claims that front-end products should be designed to accomplish two simultaneous objectives: solving the customer's main problem while also creating a new problem that requires solving
- The weight loss supplement example demonstrates that when a primary product solves weight loss, it inherently creates a secondary problem of weight maintenance that can be addressed by OTO 1
- The speaker positions problem-creation as a deliberate, intentional design strategy for front-end products rather than an accidental byproduct, enabling natural OTO upsell opportunities
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] The most important thing for having a well-structured OTO page is not just like complimentary products. It goes much deeper than that. That's relatively surface level. Instead, what you should think about is how can I properly connect the gap between the problem that my main product is aiming to solve and the complimentary product that I'm aiming to sell as OTO 1. So, I'll give you two frameworks. Number one is very simple. It's just more of the same. This works really, really well with supplement brands, for example, where if you buy one particular bottle, the very first OTO can be just more bottles for a good fraction of the price. This is great, especially for health…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Mark Builds Brands
If Your Website Looks Amazing but Nobody Buys, Watch This
The speaker argues that aesthetic design quality does not directly correlate with conversion rates. While visual appeal matters for brand building, the primary focus for conversion optimization should be on metrics like Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) rather than making a website visually stunning.
The Free Gift Objection That's Killing Your Conversions
The speaker argues that most marketers use generic offer packages (1-2-3 bundles, BOGO deals) that don't effectively overcome customer objections. Free gifts only drive conversions when they specifically address a distinct customer problem that the main product doesn't solve.
Take bigger swings
The speaker advocates for taking bolder, more creative risks in advertising and landing page testing, especially when operating at smaller scales. Rather than making incremental variations on existing winners, marketers should test diverse, extreme concepts to discover new winners and build account stability.
Never rely on one of anything
The speaker argues that relying on a single approach, platform, account, or creative format in e-commerce is inherently risky and creates vulnerability. By diversifying across advertising accounts, payment processors, business structures, and creative formats, businesses can build stability and avoid starting from scratch when one method fails.
The Real Bottleneck in Every Ad Account
The speaker argues that poor creative quality is the primary reason advertising accounts fail to generate profit. They provide specific KPI benchmarks for link CTR (minimum 3%), CPC for US traffic (around $1.50-$2), and native static CTR (5-6%), emphasizing that creatives are the real bottleneck in ad performance.