the only funnel framework you need
The speaker explains that no single funnel type (PDP, advertorial, quiz) is inherently superior to another. The effectiveness depends on the relationship between ad creative and funnel steps, with cold traffic requiring more funnel work and retargeting requiring less. The ratio of selling done by the ad versus the funnel shifts dramatically based on audience awareness.
Summary
The speaker opens by dismissing the idea that any one funnel type — PDP, advertorial, or quiz — is categorically better than another. Instead, they argue that the right funnel depends entirely on the context, particularly the ad creative driving traffic to it.
Using a ratio framework, the speaker explains that in a cold traffic scenario, the ad creative might do only about 20% of the selling work, leaving the remaining 80% to the landing page or funnel. Because the funnel carries so much of the persuasion burden in this case, it typically needs to compensate with either more funnel steps or stronger direct response, 'unaware audience' style copy and structure. A simple PDP alone would not be sufficient to close a cold prospect.
In contrast, for retargeting campaigns, the ratio is essentially flipped. The audience is already familiar with the brand or product, so the ad itself can do 80% of the selling — often just by presenting a compelling offer. The funnel in this case only needs to handle the final 20%, essentially just collecting payment. The speaker notes that retargeting campaigns naturally produce some of the lowest CPAs for this reason. The core takeaway is that funnel selection is not about which format wins universally, but about matching the funnel's depth and persuasion load to the audience's level of awareness.
Key Insights
- The speaker argues that no funnel type (PDP, advertorial, quiz) is inherently better than another — effectiveness is determined by the ad creative and the audience's awareness level, not the format itself.
- The speaker proposes a 20/80 ratio for cold traffic: the ad does roughly 20% of the selling, leaving the funnel responsible for the remaining 80% of persuasion work.
- The speaker claims that a PDP alone cannot carry the 80% selling burden required in cold traffic scenarios, implying that more funnel steps or stronger direct response copy are necessary to compensate.
- For retargeting, the speaker flips the ratio entirely — the ad handles 80% of the selling because the audience is already aware, and the funnel only needs to collect payment.
- The speaker states that retargeting campaigns naturally yield some of the lowest CPAs because the audience is pre-warmed and the funnel only needs to serve as a checkout mechanism.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] Is PDP better than advertorial? Is quiz better than PDP? Well, no, none of them are really better than one another. It just depends so heavily on the ad creative and the material that you're driving to. The funnel in your ad, let's say you do 20% of the selling. So, you get them like 20% [music] of the way. For the other 80%, can a PDP do all of that? No. The other 80% is going to be the lander. And if it's going to be 80%, that means it has to compensate typically with more funnel steps or just more direct response unaware selling in general. On the other hand, if I were to [0:30] run retargeting,…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Mark Builds Brands
the ad styles that actually print
The speaker discusses which ad formats perform well across markets, highlighting native statics, AI animation, and UGC as generally effective options. However, success ultimately depends on testing and understanding your specific target demographic's native content consumption patterns.
how to make ads that actually print
The speaker identifies two critical mistakes in native static ad campaigns: treating ads like content and overestimating creative importance. For native statics, copy is the primary persuasion tool, and most advertisers fail by not testing enough variations and using poor funnel architecture.
How to structure your post purchase upsell
Effective post-purchase upsell (OTO) pages require connecting the main product to complementary products by addressing customer needs strategically. Two proven frameworks are offering more of the same product at a discount, or creating an OTO 1 that solves a new problem created by the front-end product.
how to turn 1 winning ad into 30 variations
The key to scaling ad creative isn't finding one winning ad, but rather identifying the winning sales message behind it and then transmuting that message across multiple formats and variations. A single winning VSL can generate 30+ testable ad variations by extracting core variables and adapting them across different creative formats.
ABO vs CBO for creative testing, which is better?
The speaker discusses CBO (Campaign Budget Optimization) challenges in creative testing, recommending a minimum allocation of $50 per day per ad to prevent budget spreading. They explain that budget must scale proportionally with new ad sets, and suggest moving to ABO (Ad Set Budget Optimization) if managing too many ads becomes problematic.