how to create ads that don't look like ads
Creating ads that don't look like ads requires understanding your specific market's organic content preferences rather than defaulting to generic formats. Research your target audience's feed to identify which content formats—whether native static, podcast clips, or street interviews—actually perform well and drive conversions in that particular market.
Summary
The speaker explains that the key to creating effective non-ad-like ads is market-dependent research. Rather than assuming one format works universally, marketers must first understand what content styles their specific target audience naturally engages with and consumes organically. The recommended approach is to create a burner account, follow pages and accounts that represent your target market, and spend time scrolling through the feeds where that audience actually spends time—whether that's Facebook Reels, Instagram Reels, or other platforms. By observing what content goes viral and generates high engagement in that specific environment, you can identify the dominant content formats in that space. The speaker emphasizes that native static ads only work well because they match the organic content consumption patterns of specific market segments, not because they're universally effective at disguising ads. He illustrates this by noting that native static ads might not convert well for audiences whose organic feed primarily consists of different content types. In contrast, formats like interview ads or podcast clips would convert better for audiences that naturally consume that type of content regularly. The underlying principle is that ads perform best when they match the authentic content format preferences of the target audience.
Key Insights
- The speaker argues that native static ads work well not because they disguise ads, but specifically because they match the organic content consumption patterns of particular market segments
- The speaker claims that without understanding your target market's content preferences, ads will fail to convert regardless of how well-designed they are
- The speaker contends that podcast clips and interview-format ads convert better than native static ads for audiences whose organic feeds primarily feature those content types
- The speaker asserts that the content format landscape varies significantly across markets, requiring direct research rather than assuming best practices apply universally
- The speaker states that conversion success depends on matching ad format to the audience's actual content consumption habits rather than on the ad appearing non-promotional
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] How would you go about making ads that don't actually look like ads? What you have to do is market dependent. So, your specific market that you're selling to has specific styles of content that do well organically. Maybe it's a native static, maybe it's podcast clips, maybe it's street interviews, but you don't know until you scroll the feed yourself. So, what I recommend you do is create a burner account and go [music] like all the pages, go follow all the people that your market actually would, and then doom scroll on Facebook reels or Instagram reels, wherever your market typically hangs out more. And understand [0:31] the types of content that actually does well, that goes…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Mark Builds Brands
how to turn 1 winning ad into 30 variations
The key to scaling ad creative isn't finding one winning ad, but rather identifying the winning sales message behind it and then transmuting that message across multiple formats and variations. A single winning VSL can generate 30+ testable ad variations by extracting core variables and adapting them across different creative formats.
ABO vs CBO for creative testing, which is better?
The speaker discusses CBO (Campaign Budget Optimization) challenges in creative testing, recommending a minimum allocation of $50 per day per ad to prevent budget spreading. They explain that budget must scale proportionally with new ad sets, and suggest moving to ABO (Ad Set Budget Optimization) if managing too many ads becomes problematic.
the media buying structure that prints like a mf
The speaker explains their media buying structure for creative testing, recommending ABOs (Ad Set Budget Optimization) over CBOs (Campaign Budget Optimization) because CBOs require constant daily budget increases to accommodate new ad sets, which creates allocation conflicts between testing and winning creatives.
why people hit checkout and still don’t buy
The speaker addresses why customers reach checkout but don't complete purchases, identifying two primary culprits: incorrect ad conversion optimization (tracking the wrong events like add-to-cart instead of purchases) or broken checkout functionality. Diagnosing the issue requires analyzing the drop-off point between initiating and reaching checkout to determine if the problem stems from ads/traffic or payment processing.
how to enter a saturated market and still print
The speaker advocates for entering saturated markets through the 'purple ocean theory'—targeting a specific niche within a larger market rather than trying to appeal to everyone. Success requires absolute certainty that your target audience wants your product and hyper-specific marketing messaging tailored to that niche's voice of customer.