The US Midterm Campaign Trends Ken Fisher Is Watching
Ken Fisher analyzes the 2026 US midterm election landscape, identifying headwinds and tailwinds for both Republicans and Democrats. He highlights Republican vulnerability due to thin margins and low presidential approval ratings, while noting Democrats lack a cohesive positive message beyond anti-Trump sentiment. Fisher concludes that regardless of outcome, midterms will likely produce gridlock favorable to stock markets.
Summary
Ken Fisher opens by framing the midterm election environment as heading into an 'ugly fall,' which he notes is typical for midterm cycles. He identifies the Republican Party's core structural problem: very thin margins in both the House and Senate. While redistricting has helped Republicans somewhat, even a below-average anti-incumbent wave would be enough to hand the House to Democrats. Fisher also flags President Trump's low approval ratings as a significant liability, noting these levels have historically always resulted in the president's party taking significant midterm losses — though he acknowledges Trump has surprised skeptics before, including with his 2024 reelection.
On the fundraising front, Fisher notes that Republicans have narrowed the traditional Democratic financial advantage, which he sees as a meaningful tailwind for the GOP. He also points out that presidential approval polling on sites like Real Clear Politics tends to skew more negative than actual election outcomes, so while the trend matters, the absolute numbers should be taken with caution.
For the Democratic Party, Fisher identifies a different but equally serious problem: an inability to coalesce around a positive, forward-looking message. While anti-Trump sentiment has juice with independents, Fisher argues Democrats would be stronger with a concrete 'here's what we'll do for you' platform — similar to what Republicans lacked as well, given that many GOP officeholders are reluctant to diverge from Trump's messaging. He contrasts this with historical examples like Newt Gingrich's 1994 'Contract with America' and Kevin McCarthy's more recent programmatic approach.
Fisher then walks through specific Senate races that could determine majority control. He highlights North Carolina (open seat, leans Democrat after Thom Tillis retirement), Ohio (Sherrod Brown vs. Jon Husted as competitive), Maine (Susan Collins as a perennial Republican survivor), Alaska (complicated by ranked-choice voting), and Texas (a potentially bruising Republican primary between John Cornyn and Ken Paxton that could leave the winner vulnerable). He notes Republicans may pick up seats in states like Michigan to offset losses elsewhere.
Fisher closes by tying the election outlook to market implications. He argues that midterm elections historically produce gridlock, which markets tend to favor, and that this cycle is unlikely to dramatically change that dynamic regardless of which party gains seats. He expects continued gridlock to be a net positive for stocks, as neither party will have the power to make large, radical legislative moves.
Key Insights
- Fisher argues that even a subnormal anti-incumbent wave — below the historical average of ~20 House seat gains for the opposition party — would be sufficient to hand the House of Representatives to the Democrats, given Republicans' extremely thin margins.
- Fisher claims that Trump's approval ratings are at levels that have historically never allowed a president's party to avoid significant midterm losses, while simultaneously noting Trump has repeatedly defied expectations, including winning reelection in 2024.
- Fisher contends that the Democrats' generic ballot advantage of roughly 5% — which is near its historical baseline rather than elevated — suggests the party is underperforming relative to where they should be given an unpopular opposing president, partly due to the drag of their progressive wing.
- Fisher argues that neither party has a clear, centralized positive message for voters, comparing this unfavorably to Newt Gingrich's 1994 'Contract with America' and Kevin McCarthy's more recent programmatic platform, and attributing the Republican silence partly to elected officials' fear of contradicting Trump.
- Fisher concludes that regardless of seat shifts, midterm elections are likely to preserve or reinforce Congressional gridlock, which he says markets tend to favor — meaning the election outcome is unlikely to create an environment where Congress can make large radical legislative moves harmful to stocks.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access