DiscussionTechnical

Jerry Parker on Big Game Hunting in the Market | #647

The Meb Faber Show - Better Investing46m 9s

Jerry Parker, founder of Chesapeake Capital and original Turtle trader, discusses pure trend following strategy, explaining how it differs from managed futures and CTAs, emphasizing the importance of letting winners run while taking small losses, and why individual stock selection outperforms index-only approaches for trend followers.

Summary

Jerry Parker returns to discuss trend following strategies and the Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT). The conversation clarifies important distinctions in the investment industry: managed futures is a broad category encompassing trend following plus mean reversion, carry trades, pattern recognition, and AI, while pure trend following is a specific subset that has defined Parker's 40-year career since 1983.

Parker emphasizes that successful trend following operates on a low win rate (around 40% or less) where only 5-10% of annual trades generate all profits, similar to how the S&P 500 works—a naive trend following strategy where only 4% of stocks account for all gains. However, trend following differs by actively exiting losing positions with stop losses and trailing stops, whereas market-cap indexing holds everything until removal.

The discussion addresses portfolio construction philosophy. Parker argues against volatility targeting and profit-taking constraints, which destroy the strategy's core value. Instead, the approach requires accepting volatility on winning trades to capture outliers, while being disciplined about losses. The strategy trades across hundreds of markets—currencies, commodities, stocks, interest rates, and increasingly individual equities—with equal weighting by sector rather than optimization based on historical performance.

A key strategic innovation is trading individual stocks rather than indices. This provides genuine trend opportunities since indices average out individual stock moves, muting trends. By trading thousands of individual stocks with the same trend following rules, the portfolio captures diverse movements and outlier opportunities that concentrated index approaches miss.

Regarding performance and investor psychology, Parker discusses the challenge of staying committed during underperformance periods. He references Kenneth French's finding that it takes approximately 64 years to determine if a strategy is broken, illustrating why performance drawdowns don't invalidate sound processes. The 2025 performance lag (down 1-2%) exemplifies this—the strategy underperformed when markets moved uniformly, but this is temporary and requires patience.

Parker criticizes the managed futures industry's focus on "crisis alpha"—positioning for stock crashes—at the expense of overall returns. He argues this trade-off is poor, as even dedicated allocations (5-10% of portfolios) provide minimal protection while simultaneously worsening overall performance.

The conversation touches on notable recent trades, including sustained strength in gold, silver, and energy, plus the yen's multi-year downtrend. Parker emphasizes that trend following cannot optimize for peaks (like silver at 120) without backtested evidence that such timing works across large samples. This accepts occasional missed peaks as the cost of adhering to systematic rules that maximize long-term compound returns.

About this episode

Today’s guest is Jerry Parker, founder and CEO of Chesapeake Capital and one of the original Turtles trained by Richard Dennis. Together we run the Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT). In today's episode, Jerry explains why managed futures isn't the same as trend following. He breaks down the math and psychology of hunting outliers, letting a few winners pay for many small losses, and why he'd never chase crisis alpha at the cost of returns. To close, Jerry explains why MFUT trades individual stocks rather than just indices. Learn more about the Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF www.cambriafunds.com/mfut Have questions? Reach out to us any time at [email protected]. Full show notes: Link (0:00) Jerry Parker (3:09) Trend following vs managed futures (11:00) Misconceptions about crisis alpha (18:42) Portfolio construction, volatility targeting, and strategy complexity (23:47) Trend following in individual stocks  (32:18) Performance reflection and importance of sticking to a strategy (37:46) Allocation challenges and memorable recent trades TO DETERMINE IF THIS FUND IS AN APPROPRIATE INVESTMENT FOR YOU, CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FUND'S INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, RISK FACTORS, CHARGES AND EXPENSE BEFORE INVESTING. THIS AND OTHER INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN THE FUND'S FULL OR SUMMARY PROSPECTUS WHICH MAY BE OBTAINED BY CALLING 855-383-4636 (ETF INFO) OR VISITING OUR WEBSITE AT WWW.CAMBRIAFUNDS.COM. READ THE PROSPECTUS OR SUMMARY PROSPECTUS CAREFULLY BEFORE INVESTING OR SENDING MONEY. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The material above has been provided for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal or investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security or strategy. The Cambria ETFs are distributed by ALPS Distributors Inc., 1290 Broadway, Suite 1000, Denver, CO 80203, which is not affiliated with Cambria Investment Management, LP. MFUT: This fund is new and has a limited operating history. There is no guarantee that the Fund will achieve its investment goal. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Commodities Risk: Exposure to the commodities markets may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. Fixed Income Securities Risk: The prices of fixed income securities respond to economic developments, particularly interest rate changes, as well as to changes in an issuer’s credit rating or market perceptions about the creditworthiness of an issuer. Foreign Securities Risk: The Fund may invest in foreign securities. Such investments involve certain risks not involved in domestic investments and may experience more rapid and extreme changes in value than investments in securities of U.S. companies. Leverage Risk: The derivative instruments in which the Fund may invest provide the economic effect of financial leverage by creating additional investment exposure to the underlying instrument, as well as the potential for greater loss. If the Fund uses leverage through purchasing derivative instruments, the Fund has the risk that losses may exceed the net assets of the Fund. Derivatives Risk: Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. Short Selling Risk: If a security sold short or other instrument increases in price, the Fund may have to cover its short position at a higher price than the short sale price, resulting in a loss. Commodity-Linked Derivatives Tax Risk: The tax treatment of commodity-linked derivative instruments may be adversely affected by changes in legislation, regulations, or other legally binding authority. Non-Diversification Risk: Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund. Commodities Risk. Exposure to the commodities markets may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. Fixed Income Securities Risk. The prices of fixed income securities respond to economic developments, particularly interest rate changes, as well as to changes in an issuer’s credit rating or market perceptions about the creditworthiness of an issuer. Foreign Securities Risk. The Fund may invest in foreign securities. Such investments involve certain risks not involved in domestic investments and may experience more rapid and extreme changes in value than investments in securities of U.S. companies. Leverage Risk. The derivative instruments in which the Fund may invest provide the economic effect of financial leverage by creating additional investment exposure to the underlying instrument, as well as the potential for greater loss. If the Fund uses leverage through purchasing derivative instruments, the Fund has the risk that losses may exceed the net assets of the Fund. Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. Short Selling Risk. If a security sold short or other instrument increases in price, the Fund may have to cover its short position at a higher price than the short sale price, resulting in a loss. Commodity-Linked Derivatives Tax Risk. The tax treatment of commodity-linked derivative instruments may be adversely affected by changes in legislation, regulations, or other legally binding authority. Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund. New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized management investment company with no operating history. Diversification does not guarantee against a loss.  Definitions: Alpha: The portion of an investment's return that differs from its benchmark after adjusting for risk, measured over a specific historical period and not predictive of future results. Crisis Alpha: Returns a strategy seeks to generate during periods of significant equity market stress — a stated objective, not a guaranteed or expected outcome. Stop Loss: A standing order to sell a security once it reaches a specified price, which does not guarantee execution at that price in fast-moving or gapping markets. Trailing Stop: A stop order set at a fixed distance from the market price that adjusts upward as the price rises and holds when it falls, carrying the same execution risks as a stop loss. Shorting: Selling a borrowed security intending to repurchase it later, which profits if the price falls and carries theoretically unlimited loss potential if the price rises. Correlation: A statistical measure of how two assets move relative to one another, ranging from -1.0 to +1.0, which changes over time and often rises during market stress. Derivatives: Financial contracts deriving value from an underlying asset, rate, or index — including futures, options, and swaps — that may involve leverage, counterparty risk, and losses exceeding the initial investment. Futures: Standardized exchange-traded contracts to buy or sell an asset at a set price on a future date, traded on margin so that leverage magnifies both gains and losses. Long: Owning or holding a position expected to benefit from an increase in the price of the underlying asset. S&P GSCI (formerly the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index): A production-weighted, energy-heavy index of commodity futures created by Goldman Sachs in 1991 and acquired by S&P in 2007, which is unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Get Stopped Out: Having a position closed automatically when a stop order triggers, which can occur on a temporary price move and exit the position before any recovery. MSCI EAFE Index: A market-capitalization-weighted index of developed-market equities outside the US and Canada, covering Europe, Australasia, and the Far East, which is unmanaged and not directly investable. MSCI Emerging Markets Index: A market-capitalization-weighted index of equities across emerging-market countries, which is unmanaged and not directly investable. Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA): An individual or firm advising others on futures, options on futures, or certain swaps, generally required to register with the CFTC and join the NFA — registration that implies no skill level or regulatory endorsement.

Key Insights

  • Parker argues that managed futures encompasses trend following plus mean reversion, carry trades, pattern recognition, and AI, making it a broader category than pure trend following, which has remained his singular focus for 40 years.
  • The strategy operates with approximately 40% or lower win rates where only 5-10% of annual trades generate all profits, yet this model parallels the S&P 500 where only 4% of stocks account for total index gains.
  • Trend following differs fundamentally from market-cap indexing by actively exiting positions with predetermined stop losses and trailing stops when trends reverse, whereas indices hold until removal.
  • Parker contends that volatility targeting and profit-taking constraints destroy trend following's core effectiveness because outlier profits require accepting large temporary drawdowns on winning positions.
  • Trading individual stocks rather than indices allows genuine trend opportunities because indices mathematically average out individual stock movements, muting the trends that trend following strategies seek to capture.
  • Parker claims the managed futures industry sacrifices overall performance returns to create 'crisis alpha' positioning for stock crashes, yet these allocations (5-10% of portfolios) provide minimal crash protection while worsening total returns.
  • Kenneth French's research suggests it takes approximately 64 years of data to determine whether an investment strategy is actually broken, making short-term performance variations unreliable signals for strategy abandonment.
  • Parker argues that trend following cannot optimize for market peaks (such as silver at 120) without large-sample backtested evidence that such peak-selling actually works historically, forcing acceptance of occasional missed tops as the cost of systematic long-term success.

Topics

Trend following vs. managed futures distinctionPortfolio construction and diversification across marketsIndividual stock trading vs. index-based approachesRisk management through stop losses and position sizingPsychological challenges of staying invested during underperformanceWin rate and outlier capture philosophyVolatility tolerance and profit-letting principlesCrisis alpha mythology in hedge fund marketing

Transcript

Welcome to the MedFaber show, where the focus is on helping you grow and preserve your wealth. Join us as we discuss the craft of investing and uncover new and profitable ideas, all to help you grow wealthier and wiser. Better investing starts here. MedFaber is the co-founder and chief investment officer at Cambria Investment Management. Due to industry regulations, he will not discuss any of Cambria's funds on this podcast. All opinions expressed by podcast participants are solely their own opinions and do not reflect the opinion of Cambria Investment Management or its affiliates. For more information, visit cambrianvestments.com. Welcome back, everybody. Summer is winding down. Hopefully you had a great one. We have a returning favorite on the…

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

More from The Meb Faber Show - Better Investing

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.