Operation Fun Run
Two geopolitical analysts discuss escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz between the U.S. and Iran following tanker attacks in early July, analyzing how oil prices function as an independent variable driving conflict cycles rather than a dependent variable to be forecast. They debate whether current hostilities represent a brief tit-for-tat negotiation or the start of a sustained second war, with one forecasting de-escalation around $100-120 oil prices and the other expressing concern about uncontrolled spiraling given depleted U.S. strategic reserves.
Summary
On July 14th, 2024, the hosts of "Geopolitical Cousins" discuss the rapidly escalating Iran-U.S. conflict that began around July 6-7 with tanker attacks in the Strait of Hormuz. One host argues Iran initiated the violence as a negotiation tactic due to frustration with stalled MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) progress, while the other contends the U.S. response has been disproportionate and marks the beginning of a second phase of conflict distinct from earlier regime-change efforts.
The primary analytical disagreement centers on oil prices as a determinant of conflict intensity. One host presents a thesis that oil prices function as an independent variable controlling both sides' willingness to engage in kinetic activity—when prices drop to $70, both sides feel comfortable escalating because the economic pain threshold hasn't been reached; when prices approach $100-120, both sides become motivated to de-escalate. The other host counters that while material constraints (depleted SPR reserves, lowest OECD inventories since 1990, zero OPEC spare capacity) do constrain behavior, Trump administration decision-making may override these constraints for 2-3 months, potentially causing uncontrollable escalation spirals.
They discuss three reasons for Iranian escalation: (1) domestic political vulnerability following Supreme Leader Khomeini's death requiring distraction through kinetic activity; (2) strategic interest in controlling Strait of Hormuz transit routes through a "salami-slicing" exhaustion strategy; and (3) economic necessity given oil price floors. The hosts debate whether Iran truly cares about collateral economic damage to countries like Indonesia and China, with disagreement on whether international economic consequences factor into Iranian calculations.
A secondary discussion addresses the structural shift in objectives: the first phase (February-March) was U.S.-led regime change war, while the current phase appears to be about controlling Strait of Hormuz access, with Israel notably sidelined from the conflict. One host argues this constraint proves America's military position is weaker, while the other notes both sides still operate "within the lines," targeting military assets rather than civilian infrastructure.
They touch on broader geopolitical implications including China's strategic petroleum reserve filling (suggesting foreknowledge of U.S. actions), the Fujairah pipeline alternative to Hormuz coming online in Q1 2027 (which will reduce Hormuz's strategic importance), and spillover effects on Japan's economy, the carry trade, and European politics. The hosts note El Niño impacts on French agriculture and temperatures, which contributed to recent French political shifts. They conclude with predictions about the World Cup semi-finals (France vs. Spain, England vs. Argentina), with one host expressing concern about potential referee bias favoring Argentina for a France-Argentina rematch.
About this episode
<p>Iran again. Yes, again :( nobody's thrilled, but that's the content. The cousins break down a week of tanker attacks, retaliations to retaliations, and a 20% toll that became "great investments" in 24 hours. Marko's pitch: stop forecasting oil prices and start using them - they're an input, not an output. Jacob pushes back on who actually wants what. Then Japan, where rising yields and a yen at 162 have the macro world whispering about the carry trade. Plus a super El Niño, and the World Cup - because apparently the whole planet is rooting for England now. Rare. </p><p>--</p><p><strong><u>Timestamps:</u></strong></p><p>(00:00) - Welcome and agenda</p><p>(00:36) - Iran flare-up timeline</p><p>(03:28) - Why Iran escalates</p><p>(06:59) - Oil prices drive conflict</p><p>(20:24) - China signals and forecasts</p><p>(23:18) - War 2.0 and Hormuz limits</p><p>(28:46) - Rangebound Oil Equilibrium</p><p>(30:33) - Hormuz Alternatives Rising</p><p>(32:50) - Spiral Risk And CPI</p><p>(36:18) - Trump Thesis And Forecasts</p><p>(41:21) - World Cup Ref Drama</p><p>(47:03) - Japan Yields And Global Spillovers</p><p>--</p><p><strong><u>Referenced in the Show:</u></strong></p><p></p><p>--</p><p><strong>Geopolitical Cousins</strong> is produced and edited by Audiographies LLC. More information at <a href="https://audiographies.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">audiographies.com</a></p><p>--</p><p><strong>Jacob Shapiro</strong> is a speaker, consultant, author, and researcher covering global politics and affairs, economics, markets, technology, history, and culture. He speaks to audiences of all sizes around the world, helps global multinationals make strategic decisions about political risks and opportunities, and works directly with investors to grow and protect their assets in today’s volatile global environment. His insights help audiences across industries like finance, agriculture, and energy make sense of the world.</p><p><strong>Jacob Shapiro Site:</strong> <a href="https://jacobshapiro.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">jacobshapiro.com</a></p><p><strong>Jacob Shapiro LinkedIn: </strong><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jacob-l-s-a9337416" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">linkedin.com/in/jacob-l-s-a9337416</a></p><p><strong>Jacob Twitter:</strong> <a href="https://x.com/JacobShap" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">x.com/JacobShap</a></p><p><strong>Jacob Shapiro Substack: </strong><a href="https://jashap.substack.com/subscribe" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">jashap.substack.com/subscribe </a></p><p>--</p><p><strong>Marko Papic</strong> is a macro and geopolitical expert at BCA Research, a global investment research firm. He provides in-depth analysis that combines geopolitics and markets in a framework called GeoMacro. He is also the author of Geopolitical Alpha: An Investment Framework for Predicting the Future.</p><p><strong>Marko’s Book & Newsletter:</strong> <a href="https://www.geopoliticalalpha.com/marko-papic" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.geopoliticalalpha.com/marko-papic </a></p><p><strong>Marko’s Linkedin:</strong> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/marko-papic-geopolitics/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.linkedin.com/in/marko-papic-geopolitics/</a></p><p><strong>Marko’s Twitter:</strong> <a href="https://x.com/Geo_papic" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://x.com/Geo_papic</a></p><p><strong>Marko’s Macro & Geopolitical Research at BCA:</strong> <a href="https://www.bcaresearch.com/marketing/geomacro" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.bcaresearch.com/marketing/geomacro</a></p>
Key Insights
- Oil prices function as an independent variable controlling conflict escalation rather than a dependent variable to be forecast—when prices drop below $70, both sides feel economically comfortable escalating; when prices approach $100-120, both sides become motivated to de-escalate and negotiate.
- The U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve has declined to a 47-year low with an unknown threshold where remaining oil becomes unusable sludge, creating material constraints that make sustained military operations in the Persian Gulf increasingly difficult for the Trump administration.
- OECD strategic inventories are at their lowest level since 1990 and OPEC spare capacity is effectively zero, fundamentally altering the macro context compared to February-March 2024 when the conflict began and making any sustained Hormuz closure economically catastrophic.
- Iran escalated hostilities partly due to domestic political vulnerability following Supreme Leader Khomeini's death, requiring kinetic distraction to prevent public recognition of Iran's inability to defend its airspace against U.S. and Israeli attacks.
- The current conflict phase (July 2024) differs from the February-March phase in objectives: the first was regime-change war while the second is about controlling Hormuz transit routes, with Israel removed from active participation, indicating a shift in U.S. strategic thinking.
- China's strategic petroleum reserve was filled to maximum capacity before the July escalation and China subsequently banned helium exports while allowing refined petroleum product exports, suggesting foreknowledge of U.S. military plans and strategic positioning.
- The Fujairah pipeline being built by China and UAE at an accelerated pace, due for completion in Q1 2027, will make the Strait of Hormuz strategically irrelevant within 12 months, creating urgency for Iran to maximize control and revenue while leverage still exists.
- Cascading geopolitical effects from Hormuz tensions are impacting Japan's ability to sustain recent wage increases due to rising energy costs, pressuring the yen, and threatening carry trade dynamics—demonstrating how Middle East conflict directly constrains macroeconomic outcomes in unrelated regions.
Topics
Transcript
Hello listeners, welcome to another episode of Geopolitical Cousins. We recorded July 14th, Tuesday around 12.30pm US Central Time. We'll get this out as quick as we can because most of this is about Iran. We spend a little time talking about soccer and then some things about Japan, El Nino, other impacts around the world. Email me at jacob at jacobshapiro.com if you have any questions, comments, concerns. Enjoy the World world cup we will see you out there all right listeners tuesday july 14th it's about 12 45 p.m central time uh i cousin i think we have to start with iran don't we i don't think that i don't think that we have any choice um i'll…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Geopolitical Cousins
Scotty Doesn't Know
In this episode of Geopolitical Cousins, the hosts discuss rising U.S. Treasury bond yields, Scott Bessent's interventions to stabilize markets, the geopolitical drivers of the bond sell-off (particularly the Iran conflict), and broader economic concerns about AI CapEx sustainability and political populism threatening data center development.
The King of Israel
The podcast episode discusses the ongoing geopolitical dynamics surrounding Iran, the U.S., and the Russia-Ukraine conflict, highlighting how these situations affect global perceptions and alliances. The speakers contemplate the implications of shifting alliances, especially the potential normalization of relations between the U.S. and Iran, and the corresponding impact on regional stability in the Middle East.
Lessons Learned
Four geopolitical strategists discuss their formative experiences, intellectual development, and the state of geopolitical analysis as a discipline. They explore what it takes to become an effective analyst, critique academia's failures in training practitioners, and debate whether corporations need dedicated chief geopolitical officers.
This Is The Way The World Ends (w/ Zeihan & Gertken)
Four geopolitical analysts discuss how the world could end within 10 years through interconnected crises: de-globalization and demographic collapse (Zeihan), Russian political instability and potential nuclear conflict (Gertken), Chinese aggression driven by insecurity amid technological change (Gerken), and the erosion of the nation-state model alongside systemic complexity (Gerken). They argue that declining demand, aging populations, fragile supply chains, and emerging autonomous military technologies create cascading vulnerabilities with no single solution.
What We Got Wrong About The World Cup (A LOT)
A podcast discussion analyzing the 2026 World Cup through quantitative modeling, geopolitical implications, and spectator experience. The hosts evaluate what their BCA Research model predicted correctly (26 of 32 knockout games), what it missed (upsets like Cape Verde and Switzerland), and debate broader issues from Messi's performance to FIFA corruption and immigration policy.