OpinionDiscussion

How Ken Fisher Chooses Stocks

Fisher Investments

Ken Fisher outlines his stock selection process, which involves identifying stock types likely to perform well, filtering out non-conforming companies, and evaluating fundamental business strengths like market share and cost efficiency. He emphasizes that investors should develop a consistent personal process aligned with their temperament to avoid panic-driven mistakes during market volatility.

Summary

Ken Fisher describes a multi-stage stock selection methodology that begins with top-down category analysis. First, he identifies which types of stocks should perform well in current conditions, while also considering alternative stock types that might outperform if his primary thesis doesn't materialize. Once he has determined the promising stock categories, he filters out companies that don't fit the profile—what he calls 'oddballs'—ensuring candidates actually possess the fundamental business characteristics of their category. Within the remaining universe, Fisher looks for companies with structural competitive advantages: high relative market share and low-cost production capabilities. These are the basic competitive advantages that enable management to incrementally outperform rivals over time. He then assesses whether these advantages are already reflected in current market pricing and, critically, whether management actually understands that these advantages are what should drive their strategy. Fisher acknowledges that his process is complex and may not suit everyone. Instead, he advocates for investors developing their own consistent, personal stock selection methodology that aligns with their individual temperament and risk tolerance. This alignment is crucial because stock market volatility is inevitable, and when temporary losses occur, an investor comfortable with their process won't panic and make destructive decisions they know to be wrong.

Key Insights

  • Fisher starts stock selection by identifying which stock types should perform well now, while simultaneously considering alternative stock types that might outperform if the primary thesis fails
  • Fisher filters for companies with high relative market share and low-cost production as fundamental competitive advantages that enable incremental outperformance versus competitors
  • Fisher evaluates whether a company's competitive advantages are already broadly recognized and priced into the market valuation
  • Fisher assesses whether management truly understands that structural advantages like market share and cost efficiency should be their strategic focus
  • An investor's stock selection process must align with their personal temperament so that market volatility and temporary losses don't trigger panic-driven decisions they know are mistakes

Topics

Stock selection methodologyCategory-based investingFundamental business strengthsCompetitive advantagesInvestment process consistencyBehavioral investing and temperament

Transcript

[0:00] Do you have a recommended stock selection process? Well, let me say that differently. I got a way I go about doing things. What I'm trying to do almost always is think through first what are the types of stocks that should do well now and some of the kinds that I think would do well if the ones that I think will do well don't. Then once I've got those types figured, I look at the stocks within the types and I want to be sure that I don't have any oddballs. So I [0:32] throw out oddballs, ones that don't look and act and have the fundamental business of the type. So in that then I look…

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

More from Fisher Investments

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.