Fisher Investments’ Founder, Ken Fisher, Debunks: “Who Needs Foreign?”
Ken Fisher argues that including foreign stocks in an investment portfolio provides better diversification and lower volatility than owning only U.S. stocks, despite recent U.S. market outperformance. He contends that historically, U.S. and non-U.S. stocks deliver similar long-term returns, with performance leadership alternating between regions over 10-15 year cycles.
Summary
In this installment of his Debunkery series, Ken Fisher addresses the question "Who Needs Foreign?" and argues that foreign stock allocation is important for most long-term investors. Fisher begins by establishing his core principle: correctly categorized stocks of different types—growth vs. value, large vs. small, U.S. vs. non-U.S.—should deliver similar returns over the very long term, though short- and intermediate-term returns can vary significantly based on expected earnings changes.
Fisher acknowledges that recent years have seen U.S. stocks significantly outperform non-U.S. stocks, leading many investors to adopt a passive S&P 500-only strategy. However, he argues this approach carries concentrated risk: if something negative happens to America's economy or markets, a U.S.-only portfolio provides no hedge. He emphasizes that historically, periods of U.S. leadership have been followed by periods of non-U.S. outperformance, with these cycles lasting 10-15 years—long enough to feel permanent to investors.
Fisher illustrates his point with the technology sector, noting that while the U.S. dominates tech innovation, foreign holdings like Taiwan Semiconductor and ASML provide additional opportunities. He also highlights that non-U.S. stocks have larger weightings in industrials and banks compared to the U.S., providing natural diversification benefits when those sectors perform well.
Crucially, Fisher raises the question whether the U.S. market has entered a period of multi-year underperformance relative to foreign stocks, noting that 2025 has already seen U.S. stocks drop significantly in global rankings. He concludes that global diversification provides the best risk-adjusted returns and highest probability of achieving strong long-term results, with lower total volatility than U.S.-only strategies.
Key Insights
- Fisher argues that correctly categorized stocks across different types should end up with very similar long-term returns, but short- and intermediate-term returns can vary wildly based on expected earnings movements.
- U.S. and non-U.S. stock returns have historically alternated leadership in cycles lasting 10-15 years—long enough to convince investors these periods are permanent—rather than showing consistent outperformance by one region.
- Non-U.S. stocks have higher weightings in industrials and banks compared to the U.S., creating natural diversification benefits and allowing investors to access broader sector opportunities globally.
- Fisher raises the question whether the U.S. has entered a multi-year lagging period after leading for many years, noting that U.S. stocks dropped significantly in global performance rankings from 2024 to 2025, but states he cannot provide certainty on this outcome.
- Fisher contends that the goal should be achieving the highest probability of getting a very good return, which comes more from global diversification than concentrating in any single country.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] For most of the people that are going to listen to this video, you're trying to get a good return without taking too darn much risk. You don't see yourself as a wheeler-dealer. You don't see yourself as a hot hand. And you say to yourself, "how do I do that?" So, a couple of years ago, I started doing these monthly depictions of these little short chapters out of my Debunkery book from 2011 and, you know, [0:31] there's just-these are all like, really short chapters, taking something that people talk about and saying, "why, it's nonsense." And there's enough nonsense out there about capital markets that I probably could have written a book three times as long,…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Fisher Investments
3 Things You Need to Know This Week | US Inflation, UK GDP, RBA (August 10, 2026)
This week's episode discusses key economic indicators including US inflation, UK GDP growth, and the Reserve Bank of Australia's interest rate policy. The outlook suggests inflation fears may be overstated, with a resilient UK economy and a cautious watch on Australian rate hikes.
This Week in Review | Record Highs, US Jobs, Yen Intervention (August 7, 2026)
This week's market review highlights new S&P 500 and global stock record highs driven by easing AI concerns and lower oil prices, mixed July employment data showing payroll decline but unemployment improvement, and coordinated US-Japan yen intervention to stabilize currency markets.
Are Stocks Ignoring Iran War Risks?
Equity markets are increasingly ignoring Iran war risks as investors recognize the conflict's economic impacts remain contained. While initial geopolitical tensions caused oil price spikes and market volatility, the on-again-off-again nature of the conflict now generates muted market reactions as the global economic implications appear limited.
How Ken Fisher Chooses Stocks
Ken Fisher outlines his stock selection process, which involves identifying stock types likely to perform well, filtering out non-conforming companies, and evaluating fundamental business strengths like market share and cost efficiency. He emphasizes that investors should develop a consistent personal process aligned with their temperament to avoid panic-driven mistakes during market volatility.
Ken Fisher: Don’t Let Central Banks Worry You
Ken Fisher argues that investors should not worry about central bank interest rate hikes because widespread concerns about them are already priced into stock markets. He contends that focusing on what everyone else worries about is pointless since the market has already accounted for these concerns.