Fisher Investments’ Founder, Ken Fisher, Debunks: “Who Needs Foreign?”
Ken Fisher argues that including foreign stocks in an investment portfolio provides better diversification and lower volatility than owning only U.S. stocks, despite recent U.S. market outperformance. He contends that historically, U.S. and non-U.S. stocks deliver similar long-term returns, with performance leadership alternating between regions over 10-15 year cycles.
Summary
In this installment of his Debunkery series, Ken Fisher addresses the question "Who Needs Foreign?" and argues that foreign stock allocation is important for most long-term investors. Fisher begins by establishing his core principle: correctly categorized stocks of different types—growth vs. value, large vs. small, U.S. vs. non-U.S.—should deliver similar returns over the very long term, though short- and intermediate-term returns can vary significantly based on expected earnings changes.
Fisher acknowledges that recent years have seen U.S. stocks significantly outperform non-U.S. stocks, leading many investors to adopt a passive S&P 500-only strategy. However, he argues this approach carries concentrated risk: if something negative happens to America's economy or markets, a U.S.-only portfolio provides no hedge. He emphasizes that historically, periods of U.S. leadership have been followed by periods of non-U.S. outperformance, with these cycles lasting 10-15 years—long enough to feel permanent to investors.
Fisher illustrates his point with the technology sector, noting that while the U.S. dominates tech innovation, foreign holdings like Taiwan Semiconductor and ASML provide additional opportunities. He also highlights that non-U.S. stocks have larger weightings in industrials and banks compared to the U.S., providing natural diversification benefits when those sectors perform well.
Crucially, Fisher raises the question whether the U.S. market has entered a period of multi-year underperformance relative to foreign stocks, noting that 2025 has already seen U.S. stocks drop significantly in global rankings. He concludes that global diversification provides the best risk-adjusted returns and highest probability of achieving strong long-term results, with lower total volatility than U.S.-only strategies.
Key Insights
- Fisher argues that correctly categorized stocks across different types should end up with very similar long-term returns, but short- and intermediate-term returns can vary wildly based on expected earnings movements.
- U.S. and non-U.S. stock returns have historically alternated leadership in cycles lasting 10-15 years—long enough to convince investors these periods are permanent—rather than showing consistent outperformance by one region.
- Non-U.S. stocks have higher weightings in industrials and banks compared to the U.S., creating natural diversification benefits and allowing investors to access broader sector opportunities globally.
- Fisher raises the question whether the U.S. has entered a multi-year lagging period after leading for many years, noting that U.S. stocks dropped significantly in global performance rankings from 2024 to 2025, but states he cannot provide certainty on this outcome.
- Fisher contends that the goal should be achieving the highest probability of getting a very good return, which comes more from global diversification than concentrating in any single country.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] For most of the people that are going to listen to this video, you're trying to get a good return without taking too darn much risk. You don't see yourself as a wheeler-dealer. You don't see yourself as a hot hand. And you say to yourself, "how do I do that?" So, a couple of years ago, I started doing these monthly depictions of these little short chapters out of my Debunkery book from 2011 and, you know, [0:31] there's just-these are all like, really short chapters, taking something that people talk about and saying, "why, it's nonsense." And there's enough nonsense out there about capital markets that I probably could have written a book three times as long,…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Fisher Investments
Fisher Investments’ Founder, Ken Fisher, Debunks: “Baby Boomers Retire, World Ends, Etc.”
Ken Fisher debunks the myth that baby boomer retirements will harm the economy, explaining that Social Security cannot technically go bankrupt since it's a pay-as-you-go system, and that retirees actually save more than commonly believed, reinvesting their wealth back into the economy.
This Week in Review | Market Volatility, Cryptocurrencies, Roth Conversions (Sept. 25, 2026)
This Week in Review covers three major financial topics: stock market volatility driven by AI concerns and bond yields, Bitcoin's recent rally above $86,000 despite remaining below its October peak, and the strategic considerations for Roth IRA conversions as a tax planning tool.
What Equity Supply Is Signaling Now
Equity supply monitoring is important for understanding stock market pricing dynamics. Currently, equity supply growth is not problematic because IPO activity has cooled following SpaceX's underperformance, and M&A stock-based deals remain limited.
Ken Fisher: Will Stocks Finish Strong in 2026?
Ken Fisher explains the 'midterm miracle,' a historical pattern showing that the fourth quarter of a U.S. president's second year and the two subsequent quarters have demonstrated approximately 95% profitability over the past 100 years. He attributes this to reduced political risk aversion after midterm elections when the opposition gains power, limiting the president's ability to pass major legislation.
One Market Risk Ken Fisher Is Watching
Ken Fisher identifies a significant unpriced market risk: the absence of a classic bear market coupled with a business cycle recession for 17 years, which means necessary economic 'house cleaning' hasn't occurred. He argues that the biggest risks are often those we cannot anticipate, not the widely-discussed ones already priced into markets.