Are Stocks Ignoring Iran War Risks?
Equity markets are increasingly ignoring Iran war risks as investors recognize the conflict's economic impacts remain contained. While initial geopolitical tensions caused oil price spikes and market volatility, the on-again-off-again nature of the conflict now generates muted market reactions as the global economic implications appear limited.
Summary
The speaker discusses how geopolitics, particularly the Iran war that began earlier in the year, initially had significant impacts on markets and economies. When the conflict began, oil prices spiked dramatically, creating concerns about inflation and monetary policy impacts, which coincided with notable equity market volatility.
However, the situation has evolved. Markets have recovered significantly from their initial downturn, yet the conflict itself has remained unpredictable, characterized by periods of apparent de-escalation followed by sudden flare-ups. The speaker notes that investors frequently ask about the market implications of this volatile, on-again-off-again nature of the conflict.
The key insight is that markets are reacting less to each new development from the war. After the initial downside volatility and subsequent recovery, equity markets have become increasingly desensitized to conflict announcements. This reduced reactivity stems from a growing market recognition that the global economic impacts of the war are fairly contained. While oil prices have been affected, they have declined substantially from their peak levels just months earlier.
The speaker emphasizes that the conflict appears to be geographically confined to Iran and the broader Middle East region without signs of wider expansion. This containment significantly limits the global economic implications. The speaker argues that markets rightly recognize that as long as the conflict remains contained and oil price spikes don't persist, the broader economic and corporate earnings impacts will be limited. Therefore, markets are moving on from the geopolitical concerns because the fundamental economic implications appear relatively modest in the conflict's current state.
Key Insights
- Markets are reacting less frequently to conflict announcements as the on-again-off-again nature of the Iran war continues, showing investor desensitization after initial volatility.
- The global economic impacts of the Iran war are becoming increasingly recognized as contained, with no signs of the conflict spreading beyond the Middle East region.
- Oil prices have declined significantly from their peak levels several months ago despite the ongoing conflict, reducing the economic threat to markets.
- Markets care primarily about economic impacts rather than humanitarian considerations when evaluating geopolitical conflicts for investment purposes.
- The lack of conflict resolution, while frustrating, is not preventing market recovery because markets focus on economic containment rather than political outcomes.
Topics
Transcript
[0:04] Geopolitics has been a very important topic for markets and economies so far this year. Earlier this year, when the Iran war started, you saw big spikes in oil prices that led to lots of worries about inflation and the impact that might have on monetary policy, and you saw a fair amount of equity market volatility coinciding with that. Since then, we've seen a nice recovery in equity markets, but what we've seen with the conflict itself is that it's been on again-off again. Seems like we're getting some relief, maybe coming closer to some type of agreement that might end the war, and then suddenly things flare back up again. [0:36] Quite often, investors ask me, "Well,…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Fisher Investments
This Week in Review | US Inflation, UK Gov’t Budget, ECB Interest Rate Decision (Sept. 11, 2026)
This Week in Review covers three major economic events: US inflation remained at 3.4% headline and 2.4% core in August despite Middle East conflict pressures; UK Chancellor John Healey emphasized fiscal discipline and growth-focused policies ahead of October's budget; and the ECB raised rates by 25 basis points, marking its second hike of 2026.
Has This Bull Market Run Too Far, Too Fast?
Ken Fisher argues that the current bull market since October 2022 has not run too far or too fast, returning about 20% annually compared to the long-term average of 10%. He explains that this comparison is misleading because the 10% long-term average includes both bull and bear markets, while bull markets alone average 23% annually, making the current bull market actually slightly subdued for a bull market.
3 Things You Need to Know This Week | Fed Minutes, Housing Market, Fraud Prevention (Aug. 17, 2026)
This week's financial priorities focus on the Fed's July meeting minutes (Wednesday), July housing market data (Tuesday), and rising financial fraud concerns. While investors seek clues about potential rate hikes and worry about housing weakness, broader market drivers remain strong and much negative sentiment is already priced in.
This Week in Review | US Inflation, Midterm Primaries, Q2 Earnings (Aug. 14, 2026)
This Week in Review covers July's cooling CPI data (3.4% YoY), the midterm election cycle and its historically positive market implications, and broad-based Q2 earnings growth driven by more than just AI investments. The episode emphasizes staying disciplined through political uncertainty and recognizing earnings strength across multiple sectors and geographies.
Fisher Investments’ Founder, Ken Fisher, Debunks: “Who Needs Foreign?”
Ken Fisher argues that including foreign stocks in an investment portfolio provides better diversification and lower volatility than owning only U.S. stocks, despite recent U.S. market outperformance. He contends that historically, U.S. and non-U.S. stocks deliver similar long-term returns, with performance leadership alternating between regions over 10-15 year cycles.