Are Stocks Ignoring Iran War Risks?
Equity markets are increasingly ignoring Iran war risks as investors recognize the conflict's economic impacts remain contained. While initial geopolitical tensions caused oil price spikes and market volatility, the on-again-off-again nature of the conflict now generates muted market reactions as the global economic implications appear limited.
Summary
The speaker discusses how geopolitics, particularly the Iran war that began earlier in the year, initially had significant impacts on markets and economies. When the conflict began, oil prices spiked dramatically, creating concerns about inflation and monetary policy impacts, which coincided with notable equity market volatility.
However, the situation has evolved. Markets have recovered significantly from their initial downturn, yet the conflict itself has remained unpredictable, characterized by periods of apparent de-escalation followed by sudden flare-ups. The speaker notes that investors frequently ask about the market implications of this volatile, on-again-off-again nature of the conflict.
The key insight is that markets are reacting less to each new development from the war. After the initial downside volatility and subsequent recovery, equity markets have become increasingly desensitized to conflict announcements. This reduced reactivity stems from a growing market recognition that the global economic impacts of the war are fairly contained. While oil prices have been affected, they have declined substantially from their peak levels just months earlier.
The speaker emphasizes that the conflict appears to be geographically confined to Iran and the broader Middle East region without signs of wider expansion. This containment significantly limits the global economic implications. The speaker argues that markets rightly recognize that as long as the conflict remains contained and oil price spikes don't persist, the broader economic and corporate earnings impacts will be limited. Therefore, markets are moving on from the geopolitical concerns because the fundamental economic implications appear relatively modest in the conflict's current state.
Key Insights
- Markets are reacting less frequently to conflict announcements as the on-again-off-again nature of the Iran war continues, showing investor desensitization after initial volatility.
- The global economic impacts of the Iran war are becoming increasingly recognized as contained, with no signs of the conflict spreading beyond the Middle East region.
- Oil prices have declined significantly from their peak levels several months ago despite the ongoing conflict, reducing the economic threat to markets.
- Markets care primarily about economic impacts rather than humanitarian considerations when evaluating geopolitical conflicts for investment purposes.
- The lack of conflict resolution, while frustrating, is not preventing market recovery because markets focus on economic containment rather than political outcomes.
Topics
Transcript
[0:04] Geopolitics has been a very important topic for markets and economies so far this year. Earlier this year, when the Iran war started, you saw big spikes in oil prices that led to lots of worries about inflation and the impact that might have on monetary policy, and you saw a fair amount of equity market volatility coinciding with that. Since then, we've seen a nice recovery in equity markets, but what we've seen with the conflict itself is that it's been on again-off again. Seems like we're getting some relief, maybe coming closer to some type of agreement that might end the war, and then suddenly things flare back up again. [0:36] Quite often, investors ask me, "Well,…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Fisher Investments
This Week in Review | Fed Rate Hike, Tech Volatility & AI Risks, Bond Yields (Sept. 18, 2026)
This Week in Review covers three major market developments: the Federal Reserve's first rate hike since 2023 (25 basis points to 3.75-4%), tech sector volatility driven by AI safety concerns, and rising bond yields globally reaching levels unseen in decades. The hosts emphasize that these moves were largely expected, offer historical context for current yields, and remind investors to focus on broader fundamentals rather than short-term market swings.
Will Stocks Finish Strong in 2026?
Ken Fisher explains the 'Midterm Miracle' phenomenon, which shows that the fourth quarter of a president's second-term midterm election year and the subsequent two quarters historically represent the most consistently profitable nine-month period for stock markets. He expects strong market performance through the end of 2026 and into early 2027 based on this historical pattern.
Ken Fisher: Has This Bull Market Run Too Far, Too Fast?
Ken Fisher argues that the current bull market's 20% average return since October 2022 is not excessive relative to historical bull market performance. He contends that the concern about the market rising "too far, too fast" is a misguided perspective, since bull markets historically average 23% annual returns and this current market is performing in line with long-term bull market norms.
Ken Fisher on Market Crashes, US Debt, Construction and More
Ken Fisher addresses investor questions about market crashes, government debt, construction indicators, and risk management. He argues that there's insufficient evidence to determine whether crashes are less likely today, that debt-to-GDP ratios tell us nothing meaningful, and that construction trends are not particularly important economic indicators.
3 Things You Need to Know This Week | Fed Decision, US Retail Sales, Medicare (Sept. 14, 2026)
This episode covers three key financial topics: the upcoming Federal Reserve rate decision expected to be a 25 basis point hike, August retail sales data release that shouldn't be over-interpreted due to monthly volatility, and the Medicare annual enrollment period opening October 15th through December 7th.