A Candid Take on US-Canada Tariffs
Ken Fisher argues that US-Canada tariffs are counterproductive political theater that harm both nations without achieving their stated goals. He contends tariffs are fundamentally negative tools, citing evidence that trade deficits actually increased after tariff implementation, and suggests both leaders benefit politically while ordinary citizens suffer the consequences.
Summary
Ken Fisher presents a critical analysis of recent US-Canada tariff disputes, beginning with his stated bias against tariffs as economic policy tools. He characterizes the tariff announcements by President Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Carney as emotionally-driven rather than principle-based, advocating instead for a "First, do no harm" political philosophy.
Fisher examines Trump's April 2, 2025 global tariff announcement, which was justified by claims of trade deficits and foreign market manipulation. However, Fisher provides empirical evidence contradicting tariffs' effectiveness: in the four months before the tariffs were imposed, the trade deficit nearly doubled as importers rushed to beat the tariffs. Following the tariff implementation, the trade deficit subsequently grew by 25%, suggesting tariffs failed to achieve their stated objective.
Applying this logic to the US-Canada bilateral situation, Fisher notes the countries have maintained a free trade agreement despite running a trade deficit. He explains that trade deficits are influenced by multiple factors beyond tariffs, and that numerous legal and illegal workarounds exist to circumvent tariff restrictions—describing tariffs as ineffective as "pouring water through cloth."
Fisher identifies a political irony: both Trump and Carney gain domestic political popularity by criticizing each other, creating perverse incentives for escalation despite real harm to citizens. He emphasizes that while America can absorb economic damage better due to its size, both nations will experience pointless suffering. Fisher concludes this is a political tragedy that will likely resolve after midterm elections and could have been handled more civilly.
Key Insights
- The trade deficit doubled in the four months before tariffs were imposed as importers rushed inventory ahead of expected tariffs, then grew 25% after tariffs were implemented, demonstrating tariffs failed to reduce the stated target metric
- Tariffs are inherently ineffective because there are numerous legal and illegal methods to circumvent them, resulting in tariffs being collected at only a small percentage of their supposed charged rate
- Both President Trump and Prime Minister Carney gain domestic political popularity when criticizing each other, creating mutual incentives for escalation despite causing real economic harm to citizens
- Trade deficits with Canada cannot be singularly attributed to tariff issues, as multiple factors influence trade balances and substitution mechanisms exist to work around tariff restrictions
- Fisher predicts the US-Canada tariff conflict will likely resolve after midterm elections, suggesting it is driven by short-term political calculation rather than substantive economic policy objectives
Topics
Transcript
[0:04] Recent months, it's been a lot of hoopla. President Trump applying tariffs to Canada. Carney in Canada applying tariffs to the US. Hostilities expressed both ways. I'm just going to say that a lot of that stuff was shoot from the hip, emotions from politicians who would do better to be slow and operate off of a principle of "First, do no harm." [0:37] Now, I have a big bias. I'm biased against tariffs. I've always been biased against tariffs. I don't think tariffs are all in everything, but tariffs are a negative. They're not a positive. The fact of the matter is there's a lot of things you can say. Let me take you to the fecklessness of…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Fisher Investments
3 Things You Need to Know This Week | US Jobs, Global Inflation, Midterm Miracle (Sept. 28, 2026)
This episode covers three key market topics: September's US jobs report showing continued employment growth and lower unemployment, inflation data from the US and eurozone indicating gradual price moderation, and the upcoming 2026 midterm elections which historically trigger a nine-month period of strong stock market performance due to legislative gridlock.
Fisher Investments’ Founder, Ken Fisher, Debunks: “Baby Boomers Retire, World Ends, Etc.”
Ken Fisher debunks the myth that baby boomer retirements will harm the economy, explaining that Social Security cannot technically go bankrupt since it's a pay-as-you-go system, and that retirees actually save more than commonly believed, reinvesting their wealth back into the economy.
This Week in Review | Market Volatility, Cryptocurrencies, Roth Conversions (Sept. 25, 2026)
This Week in Review covers three major financial topics: stock market volatility driven by AI concerns and bond yields, Bitcoin's recent rally above $86,000 despite remaining below its October peak, and the strategic considerations for Roth IRA conversions as a tax planning tool.
What Equity Supply Is Signaling Now
Equity supply monitoring is important for understanding stock market pricing dynamics. Currently, equity supply growth is not problematic because IPO activity has cooled following SpaceX's underperformance, and M&A stock-based deals remain limited.
Ken Fisher: Will Stocks Finish Strong in 2026?
Ken Fisher explains the 'midterm miracle,' a historical pattern showing that the fourth quarter of a U.S. president's second year and the two subsequent quarters have demonstrated approximately 95% profitability over the past 100 years. He attributes this to reduced political risk aversion after midterm elections when the opposition gains power, limiting the president's ability to pass major legislation.