ResearchNews

🚨 You might not be getting the protein you’re paying for… 👀🧪

Trustified

A protein supplement brand endorsed by 2018 Mr. Olympia People's Champ Roelly Winklaar was lab tested for protein content. The product claims 80% protein with whey protein isolate as primary source, but multiple lab tests showed only 67-69% protein on a dry basis. The testers concluded the product is neither passing nor failing based on the results.

Summary

The video presents lab test results for a whey protein supplement that is endorsed by Roelly Winklaar, the 2018 Mr. Olympia People's Champion. The product makes a specific claim of delivering 80% protein content in flavored form, with whey protein isolate listed as the primary source.

The first round of lab testing revealed that the actual protein percentage on a dry basis was only 67%, significantly below the claimed 80%. To verify this result, the testers conducted a second test on the same batch, which yielded a slightly higher result of approximately 69% — still well below the labeled claim.

Due to the discrepancy and confusion about how to classify the product, the testers ordered a fresh batch with a different batch number and sent it to a second reputable laboratory for a blind test. This third test also returned a protein percentage of 69% on a dry basis, consistent with the earlier results.

Given that the difference between tests is not hugely significant but is still considerable compared to the claimed 80%, the testers decided not to classify the product as either a clear pass or a clear fail, leaving its status in a gray zone.

Key Insights

  • The product claims 80% protein in flavored form with whey protein isolate as the primary source, but the first lab test found only 67% protein on a dry basis.
  • A second test on the same batch returned approximately 69% protein, showing slight variation but still far below the labeled 80% claim.
  • To eliminate batch-specific variability, the testers ordered a new batch with a different batch number and sent it to a second reputable lab for a blind test.
  • The blind test at the second lab on the new batch also returned 69% protein on a dry basis, corroborating the earlier findings.
  • The testers concluded that while the difference is not hugely significant between tests, the gap from the claimed 80% is considerable enough that they chose not to classify the product as either a pass or a fail.

Topics

Whey protein supplement lab testingProtein content discrepancy vs. label claimsRoelly Winklaar brand endorsementMultiple lab test methodologyProduct pass/fail classification

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.