High Mortgage Rates and a Stuck Housing Market
Jay Backow and Jim Egan from Morgan Stanley discuss how mortgage rates have surged to 7.5% (150 basis points since February), driven by rising treasury yields and inflation concerns. This has created affordability challenges for new homebuyers and reduced housing market activity to 40-year lows, though existing homeowners with locked-in rates below 4.5% remain largely unaffected.
Summary
The podcast explores the current mortgage rate environment and its implications for the housing market. As of the recording on October 8th, the 10-year treasury yield exceeded 5.3% and the 30-year mortgage rate reached approximately 7.5%, the highest levels since 2002. The speakers identify treasury rates, inflation expectations, and geopolitical concerns as primary drivers of these increases.
The hosts explain the convexity hedging feedback mechanism: as rates rise, homeowners with existing mortgages become less likely to refinance or move, extending the average life of mortgage pools held by investors. To maintain their duration profiles, investors must sell mortgages or treasuries, which further pressures yields upward. However, the speakers note this feedback loop is currently muted because homeowners hold mortgages averaging 4.5%—approximately 300 basis points below current rates—making them substantially out-of-the-money.
Affordability impacts are significant for marginal homebuyers: the monthly payment on a median-priced home has increased over $325 in just seven months, representing a 17% increase. However, this primarily affects new buyers. Over 90% of mortgages in the U.S. remain fixed-rate, so existing homeowners' payments are unchanged. Recent demand indicators show softening: pending home sales are down 3-5% year-over-year, and purchase applications fell 10% year-over-year in September. Despite declining demand, home prices have actually accelerated due to the lock-in effect reducing listings, with price appreciation moving from 0.7-0.8% four months prior to 1.9% recently.
Regarding adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) as a potential affordability solution, the speakers note ARM issuance has increased from 15% to 16% of total mortgages, representing about 1% growth. They emphasize that not all ARMs are problematic: longer-reset products like 5-1, 7-1, and 10-1 ARMs perform similarly to fixed-rate mortgages when controlling for borrower characteristics. They distinguish these from short-reset affordability products (24-36 month fixed periods), which historically show elevated default rates and raise lending standard concerns. The current ARM growth is in the responsible longer-reset category.
About this episode
<p>U.S. mortgage rates are hovering around their highest levels in three years. Morgan Stanley Co-Heads of Securitized Products Research Jay Bacow and James Egan examine the forces keeping homeowners locked in and buyers priced out of the housing market.</p><p>Read more <a href="https://www.morganstanley.com/insights?cid=mg-SM_CORP-insights-17607" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">insights</a> from Morgan Stanley.</p><p><br /></p><p>----- Transcript -----</p><p><br /></p><p><strong>Jay Bacow:</strong> Jim, [we’re] getting a lot of questions about mortgage rates. We've been flying across the country talking to people. Are your arms tired?</p><p><strong>James Egan:</strong> I'm hoping that all the extra flapping will give them just a little bit more definition so we can show them off as we talk about adjustable-rate mortgages.</p><p><strong>Jay Bacow:</strong> And that is the definition of an ARM. Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Jay Bacow, co-head of Securitized Products Research at Morgan Stanley.</p><p><strong>James Egan:</strong> And I'm Jim Egan, the other co-head of Securitized Products Research at Morgan Stanley</p><p><strong>Jay Bacow:</strong> Today, we're here to talk about mortgage rates: how quickly they've moved, why they're here, where they might go, and what it means for the mortgage and housing market.</p><p>It's Thursday, October 8th, at 9am in New York.</p><p>Jim, as of this recording, the 10-year is over 5.3 percent. Rates haven't closed this high since 2002. The 30-year mortgage rate is around 7.5 percent. It’s about 150 basis points up since the beginning of February.</p><p><strong>James Egan:</strong> Right. There have been quick moves in rates that has led to quick moves in mortgage rates. There are a lot of implications to that – from affordability, the housing market, mortgage market.</p><p>But when we think about the relationship between mortgage rates and interest rates, Jay, there's also a feedback mechanism there. Convexity hedging is what it's typically called.</p><p>Can you discuss the role that that might have played in this current episode? And what we should expect going forward?</p><p><strong>Jay Bacow:</strong> Sure. So, the biggest driver of mortgage rates is Treasury rates. And Treasury rates are driven by a number of factors, and right now most people would point to inflation expectations and geopolitical concerns.</p><p>However, as Treasury rates go higher, homeowners that currently have a mortgage are less likely to move. And because they're less likely to move, that means that the average life of those mortgages that investors own gets longer.</p><p>And because mortgage investors typically want to keep their duration profile constant – as the average life of those mortgages gets longer, they are then going to need to either sell those mortgages or sell Treasuries, which will cause yields to go even higher.</p><p>And there's a bit of a feedback loop on that, which can pressure yields and mortgage rates even higher.</p><p>But what we would say is, at this point, we don't think there's a huge mechanism of that going through at this rate level. The average mortgage rate that homeowners have in America is almost exactly 4.5 percent. Obviously, they're less likely to move as rates go up. But they're 300 basis points out of the money.</p><p>So, from that point, it matters. But it didn't matter as much as when rates were a little lower. However, Jim, 7.5 percent mortgage rate – what does this do for housing affordability? Can you put that in context?</p><p><strong>James Egan:</strong> Yeah. So, if we just think about this in terms of what a 7.5 percent mortgage rate implies for the monthly payment on the median-priced home, we are now up over $325 dollars if we use that 7.5 percent – assuming home prices are where they are today, incomes are where they are today.</p><p>That monthly payment's up over $325 from where we are at local lows in February; or where we were at local lows in February. That's a 17 percent increase, in terms of that monthly payment over just a seven-month period.</p><p><strong>Jay Bacow:</strong> Alright, so, 17 percent increase over a seven-month period, that's kind of scary.</p><p>But as you and I have talked about in the past, given the fixed rate nature of the U.S. mortgage market, it's a tad misleading for the average homeowner in America.</p><p>So, what does this do to sales? Obviously, it's scary for new homeowners, though.</p><p><strong>James Egan:</strong> Right. Look, you brought up the implications from a duration perspective, a convexity hedging perspective. All of this is just how the lock-in effect continues to have material implications for the housing market, for mortgage markets.</p><p>But yes, these affordability issues – not that bad for homeowners who have an average rate below 4.5 percent. That's not changing. Over 90 percent of the balance or count of mortgages, depending on how you want to look at it, in the United States remains fixed rate. Their payments aren't changing, right?</p><p>But the marginal home buyer, things are getting less affordable. I don't like to use the term demand destruction. I think that sounds a little bit too over the top here. But like we are seeing some of our higher frequency or more leading indicator demand metrics show a little bit of softening here.</p><p>Pending home sales, past two months, 3 to 5 percent down year-over-year. Purchase applications, which had been very strong, in September, they were down about 10 percent year-over-year. So, look, we were seeing a little bit of demand increases this year. We were up about 2 percent year-to-date through July.</p><p>It's a small increase off of a very, very low base. But we think you're going to see with rates at these levels, if we maintain these levels, is effectively the probability or any real ability of the market to escape to the upside from an activity perspective? That probability keeps coming down. And we're going to be stuck in this turnover, very range-bound, lowest level of sales as a percentage of the housing market in 40 years.</p><p><strong>Jay Bacow:</strong> So really low activity, what does that do to prices? Is there some flow through? Is there relief coming?</p><p><strong>James Egan:</strong> Look, as demand softens, the kind of first-order expectation or the heuristic should be that prices should soften as well. But again, lock-in effect; what we've actually seen is the rate of growth for existing listings at these levels has slowed. And it's slowed pretty materially.</p><p>That's actually led to home price appreciation accelerating over the past few months. We've gone from just 0.7 or 0.8 percent four months ago to 1.9 percent for the data that we just received. We think that that level is kind of sustainable here, and we're going to be between like roughly 2 percent, give or take, for the remainder of this year.</p><p>Now, you and I have both been mentioning the lock-in effect throughout the course of this. Yes, an overwhelming majority of the market is fixed rate right now. But the media, our conversations with clients, there's been a lot of discussion of potentially a growing share of adjustable-rate mortgages to kind of help the marginal homeowner with affordability.</p><p>What are we seeing in ARMs right now?</p><p><strong>Jay Bacow:</strong> Okay. Yeah, so great question, and we are seeing a pickup in ARM issuance. If we look at the percentage of mortgages that were ARMs through the first half of this year and compare them to the percentage of ARMs in the first half of last year, it's increased by about 1 percent on aggregate issuance. It's went from about a little over 15 percent to a little over 16 percent.</p><p>And so, 1 percent increase is not a huge number by itself, but when we're talking about a little over $2 trillion of expected issuance in the course of the year across the entire mortgage market, this does help on the margin. And we do think, as we said in the past, that more uptake of ARMs would likely be a little bit of a positive solution to some of the affordability challenges.</p><p>But Jim, if people take out more ARMs, recognizing that most people only have two arms, should we be worrying about a repeat of the financial crisis and lending standards?</p><p><strong>James Egan:</strong> So, this is a question that we get a lot when we start talking about moving away from fixed-rate mortgages. And the point that I want to stress; that we want to stress here, is not all ARMs are created equal…</p><p><strong>Jay Bacow:</strong> Mine are stronger than yours?</p><p><strong>James Egan:</strong> Sure, we'll go with that. But also, if we control for borrower characteristics, right? Credit scores, loan-to-value ratios, debt-to-income ratios, right? And then we compare performance of adjustable-rate mortgages to fixed-rate mortgages, 7-1 ARMs, 10-1 ARMs, they perform very much like fixed-rate mortgages.</p><p>It's really the short-reset ARMs, what we'll call affordability products. So, they only have 24-month or 36-month fixed periods. Those are what have historically showed a much higher rate of default and something that would get us a little bit more concerned about lending standards if those were the products we're talking about.</p><p>Thankfully, they're not right now. The ARM growth that we're seeing is in the 5-1, 7-1, 10-1 space. Those have historically, again, controlling for borrower performance, performed like fixed-rate mortgages. And so, we think that you can expand mortgage product into ARMs and do it responsibly.</p><p><strong>Jay Bacow:</strong> All right. Jim, always a pleasure speaking with you.</p><p><strong>James Egan:</strong> And always great speaking to you too, Jay. And to all of our regular listeners out there, thank you for adding us to your playlist. Let us know what you think wherever you get this podcast, and share Thoughts on the Market with a friend or colleague today.</p><p><strong>Jay Bacow:</strong> Go smash that subscribe button.</p>
Key Insights
- The speakers argue that while mortgage payments have increased 17% over seven months, this primarily harms marginal buyers because over 90% of U.S. mortgages are fixed-rate with average rates around 4.5%, meaning existing homeowners' payments remain unchanged and this is not a broad-based affordability crisis.
- The speakers claim that the lock-in effect has paradoxically caused home price appreciation to accelerate despite weakening demand because homeowners are reluctant to list their homes at current high rates, reducing available inventory and supporting prices at approximately 2% appreciation.
- The speakers contend that ARM growth can be pursued responsibly if focused on longer-reset products (5-1, 7-1, 10-1 arms) which perform like fixed-rate mortgages when controlling for borrower quality, rather than short-reset affordability products that historically exhibited crisis-era lending problems.
Topics
Transcript
Jim, getting a lot of questions about mortgage rates. We've been flying across the country talking to people. Are your arms tired? I'm hoping that all the extra flapping will give them just a little bit more definition so we can show them off as we talk about adjustable rate mortgages. And that is the definition of an arm. Welcome to Thoughts on the Market. I'm Jay Backow, co-head of Securitized Products Research at Morgan Stanley. And I'm Jim Egan, the other co-head of securitized products research at Morgan Stanley. And I'm Jim Egan, the other co-head of securitized products research at Morgan Stanley. Today, we're here to talk about mortgage rates, how quickly they've moved, why they're here, where…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Thoughts on the Market
Will Midterms Test the AI Investment Cycle?
Morgan Stanley's Head of Public Policy Research examines how the midterm elections could affect AI infrastructure investment sentiment, arguing that while the elections may influence the pace and friction of data center development, they are unlikely to fundamentally reshape AI regulation. The key distinction is that state and local governments, rather than federal outcomes, control most of the policy levers affecting data center projects.
Japan’s Banks Enter a New Era of Opportunity
Morgan Stanley's Miya Nagasaka argues that Japan is entering a once-in-30-year investment cycle where companies are shifting from excess savings to increased capital spending, creating substantial new opportunities for banks through lending, debt capital markets, and M&A services. Japanese megabanks' return on equity could rise from 10-11% to approximately 15% over the medium term as corporate financing demand grows.
Canada’s Next Growth Phase
Morgan Stanley's Arunima Sinha argues that despite near-term headwinds around trade, population growth, and productivity, Canada's economy is positioned for medium-term acceleration through capital deepening and technological diffusion, with potential growth rising from 1.5% to 1.75-2% by the 2030s.
The Tension Between Equities and Bonds
Andrew Sheets explains how equities have remained resilient despite a 100 basis point rise in Treasury yields by arguing that strong corporate earnings growth (up 30% for S&P 500) offsets the negative valuation impact of higher discount rates. The equity risk premium has remained stable because earnings gains have compensated for yield increases, and investor flows continue supporting both stocks and bonds rather than switching between them.
How AI and Tokenization Could Reshape Wealth Management
Morgan Stanley analysts discuss how tokenization and AI are reshaping wealth and asset management, projecting tokenized real-world assets will grow from $40 billion to $2.3 trillion by 2030, while AI can provide up to 15 points of operating margin improvement through enterprise workflow automation rather than point solutions.