What was Doge? How Elon Musk tried to gamify government
This Guardian Long Read examines Elon Musk's brief 2025 tenure leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he attempted to apply gaming, coding, and tech company principles to streamline federal government operations. The article argues that beneath the memes and gaming metaphors lay a serious project to centralize power, expand surveillance capabilities, and target what Musk viewed as 'bugs' in the system - including undocumented immigrants.
Summary
In 2025, Elon Musk joined the Trump administration to head the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), viewing government as a 'poorly configured, big, dumb machine' that could be optimized through technological solutions. Drawing heavily from his experience with Twitter/X and his gaming interests, particularly dungeon crawlers like Diablo 4 and Path of Exile 2, Musk approached government reform as a 'speedrun' - a gaming term for completing objectives as quickly as possible using any available exploits. His office featured gaming equipment and the DOGE website included leaderboards for tracking budget cuts in real-time. Musk's philosophy centered on viewing the state as a database with 'bugs' - inefficiencies, waste, and what he considered illegitimate people, particularly undocumented immigrants whom he characterized as exploiting 'empathy' as a system vulnerability. His team implemented a 'delete, automate, and integrate' approach, using zero-based budgeting to justify all expenses anew while centralizing data from across government agencies into single repositories. This data integration effort, partnering with companies like Palantir, aimed to create unprecedented surveillance capabilities and facilitate mass deportations. The project drew on simulation theory and Matrix metaphors, with Musk positioning himself as reprogramming reality from within. However, after 130 days, Musk left DOGE amid public backlash over cuts to social programs, though many surveillance infrastructure changes remained. The article concludes that while Musk's personal political ambitions may have failed, his tenure successfully implanted tech contractors deeper into government operations and normalized the fusion of gaming culture with state power.
About this episode
Steeped in gaming and rightwing culture wars, Musk and his team of teenage coders set out to defeat the enemy of the United States: its people By Ben Tarnoff and Quinn Slobodian. Read by Vincent Lai. Help support our independent journalism at <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/longreadpod">theguardian.com/longreadpod</a>
Key Insights
- Musk conceptualized government reform as a gaming 'speedrun' where any exploits could be used to achieve objectives as quickly as possible, drawing directly from his experience playing dungeon crawler video games
- The authors argue that DOGE's primary achievement was expanding the state's surveillance capacities through unprecedented data integration across federal agencies, rather than actual cost savings
- Musk viewed empathy as a 'software vulnerability' or 'exploit' that needed to be patched out of governance systems, treating humanitarian concerns as bugs in the code base
- The Department of Government Efficiency implemented a 'delete, automate, and integrate' strategy using zero-based budgeting powered by AI tools to rebuild government budgets from scratch
- Musk promoted conspiracy theories about undocumented immigrants being used by Democrats to create a permanent electoral majority, tweeting over 1,300 times about immigration fraud in 2024
- The authors contend that Musk's approach differed from typical 'red pill' ideology by seeking to build a better Matrix rather than escape it, positioning himself as the programmer rather than the victim
- DOGE's data integration efforts specifically targeted accelerating mass deportations by creating a master database tracking immigrants across multiple government agencies
- Despite Musk's departure and public backlash over social program cuts, tech contractors like Palantir became more deeply embedded in government operations, with his companies continuing to receive Pentagon contracts
Topics
Transcript
This is The Guardian. Welcome to The Guardian Long Read, showcasing the best long-form journalism covering culture, politics and new thinking. For the text version of this and all our Long Reads, go to theguardian.com forward slash long read. What was Doge? How Elon Musk Tried to Gamify Government by Ben Tarnoff and Quinn Slobodian. Read by Vincent Lai. In 2025, when Elon Musk joined the government as the de facto head of something called the Department of Government Efficiency, he declared that governments were poor and that they were not good enough for the government. Poorly configured, big, dumb machines. To the Senator Ted Cruz, he explained that the only way to reconcile the databases and get rid of…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from The Audio Long Read
On the trail with the hunters who believe shooting big game can save Africa’s wildlife
Cal Flynn's article explores the paradox of trophy hunting in Africa's Nyassa Special Reserve, where killing wild animals generates revenue that funds conservation efforts. Through firsthand observation of a buffalo hunt and interviews with conservancy director Derek Littleton, Flynn examines how hunting income sustains anti-poaching operations and local communities. The piece questions whether this morally uncomfortable system can or should be replaced, given its apparent effectiveness.
From the archive: Putin, Trump, Ukraine: how Timothy Snyder became the leading interpreter of our dark times
This Guardian Long Read profiles Timothy Snyder, a Yale historian of Eastern Europe who became a prominent public intellectual through his warnings about Trump's authoritarian tendencies and his deep engagement with the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The piece examines his background, his controversial but often prescient predictions, and the tensions between his roles as academic historian and political activist. It also explores criticism from both the left and right about his rhetorical style and ideological positioning.
How to survive the information crisis: ‘We once talked about fake news – now reality itself feels fake’
Guardian Editor-in-Chief Katherine Viner argues that interconnected global crises — environmental, political, economic, and informational — are being driven and compounded by digital technology designed to fragment attention and stoke conflict. She contends that transparently funded, human-centered journalism serves as essential civic infrastructure to counter these forces. The Guardian's reader-supported model is presented as both a practical solution and a political act in defense of shared reality.
Stateside with Kai and Carter: Stacey Abrams on why gutting of the US Voting Rights Act is ‘evil’
Hosts Kai Wright and Carter Sherman of The Guardian's 'Stateside' podcast interview Stacey Abrams about the Supreme Court's gutting of the Voting Rights Act through Louisiana v. Calais. Abrams frames the ruling not as a partisan issue but as a move toward authoritarianism, arguing that while the decision is 'evil,' it has misread the moment and that determination — not optimism — must drive the response. She outlines strategies including court battles, voter registration, coalition building, and ultimately a new constitutional amendment affirming an explicit right to vote.
‘Lawrence is karma’: the gangster who became an icon of Modi’s India
This Guardian Long Read profiles Lawrence Bishnoi, India's most notorious gangster, who has orchestrated high-profile murders and international assassinations from inside a high-security prison. The article explores how Bishnoi rose from a privileged rural background through violent student politics to become a celebrity criminal icon in Modi's India, allegedly with links to the Indian government's covert operations targeting Sikh separatists abroad.