The Roberts Ridge Documentary Got This Wrong 😳
The speaker discusses an upcoming documentary about Roberts Ridge, defending their friend 'Slab' against character assassination claims. They argue the documentary falsely portrays Slab as abandoning John Chapman, when evidence shows Chapman died from initial gunfire wounds.
Summary
The speaker addresses controversy surrounding an upcoming documentary and movie about Roberts Ridge, a military operation. They defend someone nicknamed 'Slab' who has been accused of abandoning a fellow service member, John Chapman, on a mountain. The speaker argues this is character assassination designed to support a false narrative. They claim the documentary seeks to prove that Chapman was killed by the first volley of gunfire, which they say is supported by autopsy evidence showing terminal injuries from initial rounds. However, the speaker explains that Chapman managed to get up after being mortally wounded and single-handedly cleared out enemy bunkers before dying. The controversy centers on whether Slab abandoned Chapman or legitimately believed he was already dead when leaving the position. The speaker emphasizes that anyone who knows Slab's character would understand he would never abandon someone he believed might still be alive. They also discuss how these false accusations have contributed to Slab's PTSD and psychological harm after his military service, explaining how being falsely accused of abandoning a comrade exacerbates the mental health challenges that veterans face when transitioning to civilian life.
Key Insights
- The speaker claims there is both a documentary and movie being produced about the Roberts Ridge incident based on edited video footage
- The speaker argues that Slab's character makes it impossible he would abandon someone he believed might still be alive
- The documentary allegedly aims to prove John Chapman was killed by the first volley of gunfire, supported by autopsy evidence of terminal injuries
- Chapman reportedly got up after receiving mortal wounds and cleared out enemy bunkers single-handedly before dying
- The speaker claims the false accusations against Slab have worsened his PTSD and caused physical harm beyond normal veteran transition difficulties
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] There's a documentary about to come out about this, I've heard. >> Yeah, there's a movie, too, from the edited video that Slab left the guy. I've said to people, Slab's my friend, if you know Slab, you know he would never leave someone on a mountain who he had any doubt was not dead to character assassinate him like they did to get this other narrative forward. That's what the whole documentary is, proof that John Chapman was killed by that first volley, which even the autopsy backed up. It was terminal injuries from the first rounds. He got up and cleaned [0:31] out the bunkers himself. You had to include that slab left him up there and…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Shawn Ryan Show
Shawn Ryan Gifts Candace a SIG to Protect Herself 😳
Shawn Ryan receives a SIG Sauer P365 handgun with a Romeo X optic and suppressor from Jason at SIG Sauer as a gift for self-defense. The firearm holds 17 rounds plus one in the chamber and they plan to test it at a shooting range.
Candace Got Sued Because of Shawn’s Show 😳
Candace discusses being sued following a podcast interview with Shawn (Brian Harpool), who was part of security during an incident involving Charlie Kirk. The lawsuit claims defamation based on Candace's criticism of security competence, though she argues the person made himself a public figure through the podcast appearance.
Charlie Kirk Said He Would Die Young 😳
A speaker recounts conversations with Charlie Kirk from 2018 in which Kirk repeatedly claimed he would die young and had vivid dreams about his death being tied to Turning Point USA and saving the world. The speaker reflects on how haunting these predictions seem in retrospect and mentions experiencing similarly vivid dreams since Kirk's death.
They Sued Her Over a Blue Shirt 😳
The speaker describes a lawsuit filed against a woman for wearing a blue shirt on her last day, based on a comment suggesting she wear blue if she was under an NDA. The speaker defended her publicly and was subsequently sued for approximately one million dollars for that defense.
Can Vance Survive What Trump Did? 😳
A discussion questioning whether JD Vance can overcome controversial actions from the Trump administration, particularly regarding Iran policy and treatment of the Pope, with the speaker arguing that Vance missed opportunities to distance himself from these decisions despite his Catholic faith.