TechnicalDiscussion

Is the yield curve inverted?

Macro Mondays27m 17s

Andreas Steno and Mikael Oswald discuss the approaching yield curve inversion, explaining why bond yields matter for economic cycles and what historical data shows happens after inversions. They analyze how AI's strength may be masking how restrictive current interest rates are for the broader economy, and touch on US-China trade relations and Iran's energy situation.

Summary

The episode begins with Oswald hosting Steno, who is suffering from illness, to discuss macro trends. The primary focus is bond yields and the yield curve inversion. Steno explains that since late February/early March, long bond yields have been rising significantly—a global phenomenon following the Bank of Japan's pullback from yield curve compression. The key concern is that front-end yields (short-term rates) are now rising faster than long-term yields, approaching an inversion where 2-year yields exceed 10-year yields.

Steno contextualizes why the yield curve matters: historically, an inverted curve signals that the Federal Reserve has pushed rates above the neutral level needed for economic equilibrium, which the market interprets as indicating future slowdown. However, they note the curve hasn't fully inverted yet using Treasury metrics, though swap rates show closer inversion. Steno emphasizes that the AI buildout may be masking how restrictive rates truly are across the broader economy—AI can tolerate higher yields due to perceived unlimited returns and strategic importance, while other sectors struggle.

Regarding market implications, Steno presents historical data showing that equities actually perform reasonably well in the 12-15 months following curve inversion, despite short-term choppiness. The current environment represents 'Regime 4'—a business cycle killer where central banks deliberately restrict the economy. Banks' profitability depends on spreads between short and long rates; if the curve inverts significantly, lending incentives diminish. Steno argues this is a shortened, benign hiking cycle compared to 2022, noting that necessity price inflation currently sits at 25% versus 100%+ during crisis periods.

On US-China relations, both hosts agree Trump's summit with Xi kicked the can down the road without resolving core issues around rare earths and trade. They expect eventual re-escalation but believe energy market conditions need improvement first. Regarding Iran, they discuss how Iranian finances appear strained (supporting their earlier analysis), with Iran pushing for deal completion while Trump appears to be waiting until after midterms. They note progress toward peace talks and optimism about oil flows approaching 80% of pre-war levels, though refined products remain the critical constraint. They discuss potential Qatar-Iran deals to export refined petroleum as a possible solution.

About this episode

Apologies for the late upload! We cover the inversion of the yield curve and what that tells us about the business cycle and the outlook for equities. We also discuss the impasse in US-Iran negotiations and the US-China summit. 🔥 Get 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗘𝗦𝗦 to Real Vision https://rvtv.io/3YOZZUe Connect with Real Vision™ Online: YouTube: youtube.com/@RealVisionFinance Twitter: https://rvtv.io/twitter Instagram: https://rvtv.io/instagram Website: https://rvtv.io/3Y4t5Pw Disclaimer: https://media....

Key Insights

  • Steno argues that the AI buildout is masking how restrictive current bond yields already are across the broader economy, because AI companies can tolerate substantially higher rates due to their perceived unlimited returns and strategic importance, while other sectors struggle with the same rates.
  • Historical data shows that equities typically perform reasonably well for 12-15 months after yield curve inversion despite alarmism, though the period leading up to inversion tends to be an uptrend, suggesting timing matters significantly.
  • The current necessity inflation (25% above already-doubled COVID prices) is far less severe than crisis periods (2008, 2022) where necessity prices rose 100%+, indicating this may be a shorter, more benign hiking cycle than markets fear.
  • Banks' lending incentives depend critically on the spread between short-term and long-term bond yields; if the yield curve inverts significantly, this carry trade margin compresses and credit creation may suffer, which has particular implications for AI infrastructure financing.
  • Steno suggests Iran appears to be running out of money and pushing for a deal, while Trump is strategically waiting until after midterms to restart negotiations for better terms, leaving the situation as a time bomb for eventual re-escalation when energy market conditions allow.

Topics

Yield curve inversion and economic cyclesBond yields and monetary policyAI's economic impact and masking of restrictive ratesEquity market valuations and earnings qualityUS-China trade relations and rare earthsIran sanctions and oil market dynamicsCentral bank hiking cycles and necessity inflation

Transcript

And sometimes it may be good, sometimes it may be shit. It's Macro Mondays, big picture, clear play, stocks, bonds, FX, crypto on the way. Get context, strategy right now on your screen. Macro Mondays, level up your week, oh yeah. Hello out there, welcome to Real Vision and welcome to Macro Mondays. My name is Mikael Oswald. I'm your host for yet another episode of this podcast. And with me as usual, Andreas Steno. How are you doing, Andreas? I almost cannot hear you. Not because your sound is not up, but due to some weird virus that I've caught. Or I think my youngest son brought it with him from the daycare. So outside of that, I'm okay.…

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

More from Macro Mondays

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.