Is Risk-On Too Risky? | Macro Mondays: August 31, 2026
Andreas discusses Kevin Walsh's Jackson Hole speech, concluding it was hawkish in tone but not more so than recent Fed rhetoric, while highlighting a significant divergence between PCE and CPI inflation measures. The episode covers potential rate hike scenarios, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East affecting energy markets, and upcoming economic data that could influence Fed policy decisions.
Summary
The episode opens with discussion of Fed Chair Kevin Walsh's Jackson Hole speech, which was perceived as hawkish by many market commentators. However, Andreas's language processing model analysis reveals the speech was neither notably more hawkish nor dovish than recent Fed communications. A key surprise was Walsh's reaffirmation of PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditures) as the primary inflation metric to track, after ambiguity following the July press conference.
Andreas presents substantial analysis of the PCE-CPI divergence, noting it represents the second-largest spread since 1960, with only 1983 surpassing it—a year characterized by inflation falling off a cliff. He argues CPI is the directional guide while PCE lags in capturing inflation trends, attributing differences to PCE's focus on PPI categories and lower weighting of shelter costs, which have softened in summer. He suggests PCE is about to roll over, making Walsh's reinstatement of PCE focus poorly timed.
Regarding rate hike expectations, Andreas addresses Morgan Stanley's "cry wolf" concern—that without action, Walsh risks credibility on inflation rhetoric. The conversation explores whether a September rate hike is necessary and positions it as a mid-cycle adjustment rather than the start of a full hiking cycle. Andreas notes market expectations for multiple hikes despite Walsh explicitly stating he won't forward guide, and describes the period before midterms as "wobbly" with potential for volatility.
The discussion turns to Middle East geopolitics and energy markets. Weekend attacks on Larak Island targeting Iranian rocket launches designed to deploy sea mines are contextualized as part of the Strait of Hormuz dispute rather than broader military escalation. Andreas criticizes market overreaction and recommends shorting energy prices following escalations rather than buying into inflation narratives. He emphasizes crack spreads (the gap between crude oil and refined products) as a key deflation mechanism, noting that regaining Middle Eastern refinery capacity could unlock significant headline disinflation into Q4 and Q1.
The conversation includes analysis of the South Korean export-to-ISM manufacturing spread, described as the largest seen in 2026, attributed to AI-driven chip exports and construction-related job creation. Andreas predicts the upcoming ISM manufacturing report will surprise significantly to the upside, near 58 versus consensus of 55.2. He contextualizes the recent negative non-farm payroll print, arguing that structural changes—fewer migrants and a break-even job creation rate of ~30,000 monthly—make negative prints normal rather than concerning.
Finally, Andreas discusses the transatlantic inflation spread favoring ECB hawkishness relative to Fed policy, predicting the ECB may out-hawk the Fed in September despite potential rate hikes from both. He advocates for a short dollar trade, supported by euro strength and potential Treasury buyback operations by Scott Bessent on September 9th.
About this episode
Andreas Steno and Mikkel Rosenvold are back to unpack Kevin Warsh’s surprisingly hawkish message at Jackson Hole and what it could mean for markets. They also turn to the latest escalation in the Middle East following U.S. attacks on Larka Island. Is the war restarting, and could renewed geopolitical risk disrupt the market setup just as investors were beginning to embrace the bull case? 🔥 Get 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗘𝗦𝗦 to Real Vision https://rvtv.io/3YOZZUe Timestamps: 00:00 - Macro Mondays with An...
Key Insights
- Despite market perception of Walsh's speech as hawkish, Andreas's language model analysis found it neither more hawkish nor dovish than recent Fed communications, suggesting markets may be overinterpreting the rhetoric.
- The PCE-CPI divergence at its second-largest level since 1960 suggests PCE is lagging inflation reality; Andreas argues CPI is the directional guide while PCE will eventually roll over, making Walsh's reestablishment of PCE focus as the primary inflation metric poorly timed.
- Andreas contends that negative non-farm payrolls are structurally normal in the current economy due to reduced migration and a ~30,000 monthly break-even job creation rate, making the recent -23,000 print unremarkable rather than alarming.
- Attacks on Iranian sea-mine deployment systems represent continuation of Strait of Hormuz disputes rather than broader escalation; markets are overreacting, and the historical pattern suggests shorting energy prices after escalations is more profitable than buying inflation narratives.
- The transatlantic inflation spread favors ECB hawkishness over Fed policy in September, creating conditions for euro strength and supporting a short dollar trade, especially if Treasury buyback operations exceed current expectations on September 9th.
Topics
Transcript
Sometimes it may be good, sometimes it may be shit. It's Macro Mondays, big pictures, clip plays, stocks, bonds, FX, crypto on the way. Get context, strategy right now on your screen. Macro Mondays, level up your week, oh yeah. It's Monday, it's time for Macro Mondays on Real Vision. Oh, yeah. take a deep dive into it but let's get the headline straight here um surprisingly hawkish rhetoric maybe from uh kevin walsh at least in the opinion of many pundits is this the time to pull the brakes on some of your risk traits andreas let's start there uh no boom you want you wanted a yes or no i guess absolutely um but i'm i'm you But…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access