China Just Doesn't Care
Hosts Jacob Shapiro and Marco discuss China's response to US sanctions on Iranian oil refiners, the broader US-China relationship heading into a May summit, and Iran's attack on UAE energy infrastructure during the recording. They debate whether China is strategically patient or missing a key opportunity to demonstrate global leadership during the Strait of Hormuz crisis.
Summary
The episode opens with Jacob and Marco discussing China's deployment of a 2021 blocking measure to protect Chinese companies from US sanctions on five domestic refiners linked to Iranian oil trade. They frame this as China effectively telling its companies to ignore US sanctions, calling America's bluff given that higher oil prices from enforcement would hurt both the US and China equally as crude importers.
The hosts contextualize this within the upcoming Xi Jinping-Trump summit (May 14-15), originally delayed from March due to the US military operation against Iran. They critique Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's public call for China to use diplomacy to pressure Iran into opening the Strait of Hormuz, with Marco noting it sounds naive while Jacob argues it reflects a fundamentally misaligned worldview. The conversation explores Trump's underlying goal of recreating a Phase One-style US-China trade deal, drawing an ironic parallel to Nixon's 1972 China visit — Nixon sought multipolarity to counter the Soviets, while Trump is trying to forge a bipolar G2 arrangement in what is already becoming a multipolar world.
Marco argues China is missing a golden opportunity to demonstrate leadership to the Global South — countries like Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Ethiopia, and Paraguay that will suffer most from disrupted fertilizer and energy supplies, while wealthy nations simply outbid them for scarce resources. Jacob defends China's position as strategic patience (the 'Nikola Jokic' approach), arguing China has no reason to fix a mess America made without receiving meaningful concessions in return. The hosts debate whether China's inaction reflects deep-seated 'Middle Kingdom' psychology — a genuine indifference to playing the role of global hegemon — or simply rational self-interest.
Breaking news during the recording shows Iran attacking the UAE, including strikes on the Fujairah petroleum facility (terminus of the pipeline bypassing the Strait of Hormuz) with ballistic missiles and drones. They interpret this as Iran signaling that any attempt to unilaterally open the Strait will be met with force, and that only diplomatic negotiations will resolve the blockade.
The hosts discuss energy market dynamics, referencing a prior podcast with energy expert Rory Johnson who predicted oil prices wouldn't hit crisis levels until August-September, explaining why equity markets have remained surprisingly resilient. They argue the market is playing chicken with Trump, betting he will eventually negotiate his way out rather than escalate further.
The conversation concludes with a broader structural argument: the entire post-WWII global system was built around American security guarantees, which is why Germany didn't build a military, Australia imports fuel from South Korea, and Gulf states didn't build redundant pipelines. Unwinding this creates enormous inflationary pressure globally. Both hosts agree that for Trump's vision to work, he must reach a deal with China — because the US cannot simultaneously restructure its global posture AND maintain a trade war with the world's largest manufacturer. Public opinion data showing a rise in favorable views of China (from 15% to 30% in two years) is cited as evidence that top-down leadership narratives, not independent citizen reasoning, drive geopolitical attitudes.
Key Insights
- China deployed a 2021 blocking statute to protect domestic refiners from US sanctions, which the hosts interpret as China calling America's bluff — arguing that enforcing oil sanctions would raise energy prices harmful to both the US and China simultaneously.
- Marco argues China is missing a strategically important opportunity to demonstrate leadership to the Global South during the Hormuz crisis, as poor nations will be the ones who starve or lose access to fertilizer and energy while wealthy nations simply outbid them.
- Jacob argues China's inaction is not weakness but strategic patience — China has no incentive to fix America's mess for free and will only act if offered meaningful concessions, framing it as 'everyone has a price, what are you offering?'
- The hosts argue Trump's core goal with the China summit is not about Iran at all, but about recreating a Phase One-style trade deal — the Iran war is a complicating backdrop, not the central issue.
- The Trump-China summit is drawn as an ironic inversion of Nixon's 1972 China visit: Nixon went to build multipolarity against the Soviets, while Trump is trying to build a bipolar G2 arrangement in a world that is already becoming multipolar.
- Marco argues that China's COVID-era behavior — hoarding PPE and restricting information — and its current fertilizer export restrictions both reveal the same pattern: China prioritizes domestic stability and food security above any global leadership ambitions.
- Iran's attack on the UAE during the recording, including strikes on the Fujairah oil terminal (terminus of the bypass pipeline), is interpreted as Iran signaling that any unilateral attempt to open the Strait will be met with force, leaving diplomacy as the only viable path.
- Energy expert Rory Johnson's prior forecast — that the oil supply crunch won't hit critical levels until August-September due to large existing private and strategic inventories — explains why equity markets have remained resilient despite the ongoing conflict.
- The hosts argue the entire post-WWII global infrastructure was deliberately built around American security guarantees, meaning that when those guarantees are withdrawn, every country must simultaneously rebuild its own security and supply chain redundancy, creating massive structural inflation.
- Public opinion polling shows favorable views of China in the US rose from roughly 15% to 30% in just two years, which the hosts attribute not to independent citizen reasoning but to top-down leadership signaling — both Biden tripling down on anti-China rhetoric and Trump now seeking a deal.
- The hosts argue that a managed US-China G2 relationship, while potentially making their geopolitical multipolar forecasts look wrong, would likely be the best outcome for the most people globally over the next 10-15 years.
- Marco contends that China's reluctance to actively mediate the Iran crisis — even symbolically, such as hosting a summit — reveals that 'Middle Kingdom' psychology may be real: China genuinely does not see itself as responsible for fixing global crises, only for protecting Chinese interests first.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access