How To Trade The AI Productivity Boom | Weekly Roundup
A roundtable discussion on macro markets, Fed policy, the AI productivity boom, crypto's declining relevance, and the growing K-shaped economy. The hosts debate whether the Fed should hike rates, analyze vol mechanics driving equity markets, and express concern about widening wealth inequality being driven by deliberate policy choices favoring asset owners over Main Street.
Summary
The hosts open by discussing whether the Fed should be hiking rates, noting that Taylor Rule models suggest rates are too low given persistent above-target inflation for 60+ months. One host argues the Fed's stimulative measures — suppressing oil prices, yield management, currency manipulation — increase the risk of an energy price shock seeping into core inflation. Another host counters that hiking is unlikely given the massive federal deficit and debt rollover needs, arguing the implicit policy is to grow out of the debt with negative real rates.
The conversation shifts to the AI productivity boom and its market implications. The hosts note that while the AI theme appears real and is driving genuine earnings growth, it may be crowding out capital from other sectors including crypto — drawing a parallel to how tech growth in 2012 sucked capital out of gold miners. They discuss how crypto's most useful real-world applications (stablecoins, payment rails) generate no token value capture, and note that even longtime Ethereum bulls like David Hoffman are capitulating on ETH as an investable asset.
The hosts spend considerable time analyzing current vol mechanics, explaining how single-stock implied vol is being bid up by retail options buyers while quant funds short index vol, keeping the VIX suppressed. They note put skew is in the 4th percentile — extremely cheap protection — while call skew on semiconductors is in the 98th percentile, indicating extreme euphoria and poor risk/reward for new longs. One host shares charts on retail options flows and implied correlation to illustrate that systematic momentum strategies are amplifying the divergence between winning and losing stocks.
A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the K-shaped economy and deliberate policy choices that benefit asset owners at the expense of lower and middle-income households. The hosts argue that by propping up equity markets and suppressing vol through various mechanisms, policymakers are doing the exact opposite of what would help Main Street — which would require allowing market pain to slow inflation and then cutting rates to help small businesses and lower-income earners. They reference declining personal incomes, drawn-down SPR reserves, and falling savings rates as evidence that consumer buffers are eroding. One host warns that if the social contract breaks down, it creates conditions for more redistributive leftist political outcomes.
The discussion also covers Iran geopolitics as a key risk, with hosts arguing the U.S. has limited leverage and that Iran is incentivized to drag out negotiations while U.S. inventory buffers deplete. They expect Trump to eventually cut a deal, possibly worse than Obama's Iran deal, given midterm election pressure.
The hosts close with a discussion on trading psychology and portfolio management — emphasizing the value of patience, good entries in thematic trades, and mentally separating tactical short-term trades from long-term thematic positions. One host shares a framework from mentor Mark Hart involving 'concentric circles of adoption' (access, awareness, patina, TAM, collateral utility) as a way to evaluate thematic investment opportunities and when to enter or exit.
About this episode
This week, we're back to discuss whether the economy is entering an AI driven productivity boom and what that means for markets. We deep dive into whether the Fed should actually be hiking rates, growing signs of consumer weakness, how we're thinking about positioning in this environment and more. Enjoy! -- Timestamps: (00:00) Introduction (01:22) Should The Fed Be Hiking Rates? (07:53) The AI Productivity Boom (14:28) An Update On Market Structure (18:28) The Consumer Is Struggling (36:21) How To Trade This Market -- FOLLOW THE SHOW › Forward Guidance – https://x.com/ForwardGuidance › Felix – https://x.com/fejau_inc › Quinn – https://x.com/qthomp › Tyler – https://x.com/Tyler_Neville › Telegram – https://t.me/+CAoZQpC-i6BjYTEx › Blockworks – https://x.com/Blockworks -- Nothing said on Forward Guidance is a recommendation to buy or sell securities or tokens. This podcast is for informational purposes only. Any views expressed are opinions, not financial advice. Hosts and guests may hold positions in the companies, funds, or projects discussed.
Key Insights
- One host argues that the Fed's non-rate stimulative measures — suppressing oil prices, yield curve control, currency manipulation — are collectively more stimulative than rate cuts would have been, and that removing these measures is more appropriate than hiking rates outright.
- The hosts argue that propping up equity markets deliberately harms Main Street because the correct policy sequence for lower-income relief would be to allow market pain, let inflation slow, and then cut rates to benefit small businesses — the exact opposite of current policy.
- One host draws a parallel between the current AI capital boom crowding out crypto investment and the 2012 tech productivity surge that sucked capital out of gold miners, suggesting structural capital rotation rather than just crypto-specific failure.
- The hosts identify that crypto's most adopted real-world use cases — stablecoins and payment rails — generate essentially zero value capture in crypto tokens, with even longtime Ethereum supporter David Hoffman publicly selling ETH while remaining bullish on the network.
- One host explains that the current VIX suppression is mechanically driven by retail investors buying single-stock calls (inflating single-stock vol) while quant funds short index volatility as a hedge — creating artificial calm that can unwind violently, similar to the 2024 carry trade unwind.
- One host argues that the shift from defined-benefit to defined-contribution pension plans mandated millions of workers to become passive ETF buyers with no duration management, creating massive structural inflows that have fundamentally distorted market rationality.
- One host presents Mark Hart's thematic investing framework of 'concentric circles of adoption' — evaluating access changes, awareness, patina, TAM, and collateral utility — as a superior method to fundamental earnings analysis for timing entries and exits in thematic trades.
- One host argues that political tolerance for the K-shaped economy is self-defeating because the more extreme the wealth divergence becomes without policy correction, the more likely the political outcome shifts toward redistributive leftist governance, citing AOC and Mamdani as examples of that trajectory.
Topics
Transcript
Nothing said on Ford Guidance is a recommendation to buy or sell any investments or products. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and the views expressed by anyone on the show are solely their opinions, not financial advice, or necessarily the views of BlockWorks. Our hosts, guests, and the BlockWorks team may hold positions in the company's funds or projects discussed. As always, investments in blockchain technology involve risk, and conditions apply do your own research what's going on everybody welcome back to another round of addition forward guidance I've managed to wrangle back hosting duties from the inmates after I let you guys take over the shop last week looking Looking good with your haircuts, boys. What's up?…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Forward Guidance
Think Like Everyone Else, Lose Like Everyone Else | Brent Donnelly
Brent Donnelly discusses his new book 'Trade Outside the Box,' which applies concepts from poker, psychology, and gambling disorder research to improve trading performance. He emphasizes that independent thinking is essential to outperform the market, and explores how LLMs can help traders identify consensus narratives rather than generate trading ideas. The conversation covers Fed policy under Kevin Warsh, FX dynamics, and why traditional inflation hedges like gold and Bitcoin have underperformed equities.
The AI Trade Is Finally Cracking | Weekly Roundup
The hosts discuss a significant momentum factor collapse in tech and AI-related trades, driven by cracks in the AI narrative (Meta considering selling compute access, claims of memory efficiency breakthroughs) coinciding with yen intervention and weakening economic data. They argue the Fed should remain dovish given falling wage growth, declining labor force participation, and peaking inflation, while positioning for a shift away from mega-cap tech toward gold and debasement trades.
How To Trade The New Warsh Fed | Bob Sheehan
Bob Sheehan discusses how Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's approach signals the end of the "Fed put"—the market's assumption that the Fed will intervene during sharp risk asset selloffs. He argues this requires investors to shift from relying on Fed guidance to focusing on data-driven analysis, with distinct near-term and longer-term implications for yield curve dynamics and equity positioning.
Is The Fed Panic Already Fading? | Weekly Roundup
The hosts discuss Fed policy under Warsh, market rotations away from Mag7 tech stocks toward industrials and banks, and the shift from passive indexing bubbles to productive capital allocation in AI and biotech. They argue peak inflation and growth are occurring, rate hikes are unlikely, and the economy is rebalancing toward actual innovation rather than financial engineering.
A New Era Is Beginning In Markets | Weekly Roundup
The hosts discuss Kevin Warsh's first FOMC meeting as Fed Chair, marking the end of 'forward guidance' as a policy tool and introducing a more hawkish-but-data-reactive stance. They analyze the implications for rate expectations, global liquidity, the AI capital expenditure cycle, and MicroStrategy's deteriorating balance sheet, while arguing that peak hawkishness has likely been reached.