This Week in Review | Tariff Update, National Debt Concerns, April Jobs Data (May 8, 2026)
Fisher Investments' May 8, 2026 weekly review covers three major topics: a US court ruling striking down Trump's Section 122 tariffs, context around US national debt surpassing 100% of GDP, and April's stronger-than-expected jobs report showing 115,000 nonfarm payrolls added. The segment argues markets have largely priced in tariff risk, that debt-to-GDP is a misleading metric, and that AI-related layoffs should be viewed in broader historical and economic context.
Summary
The episode opens with an update on tariff policy, noting that the US Court of International Trade struck down President Trump's attempt to impose a 10% blanket tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. This followed an earlier February ruling by the Supreme Court that blocked tariffs issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, to which Trump had responded by invoking Section 122. Fisher Investments notes that while the original blanket tariff announcements in 2025 contributed to a significant market correction, markets responded with only normal volatility to the Supreme Court ruling and are expected to react similarly this time. The firm argues that global trade has been shifting away from US dominance for years, that tariffs are unlikely to reduce global trade overall, and that markets have already priced in much of the tariff-related risk.
The second segment addresses renewed concerns about US national debt surpassing 100% of GDP. Fisher Investments challenges the relevance of the debt-to-GDP ratio as a measure of fiscal health, arguing that the US does not pay its bills using GDP. Instead, they advocate for looking at debt serviceability through the lens of tax revenue versus interest payments. By that measure, approximately 18% of federal tax revenue goes toward servicing the debt — a level comparable to the late 1980s and early 1990s, a period of solid stock market performance. They also point to 10-Year Treasury yields hovering around 4.4%, well below the historic average of 5.8%, as a signal that bond markets are not signaling fiscal distress.
The final segment covers April's employment data, which showed nonfarm payrolls increasing by 115,000 jobs, exceeding expectations, with unemployment steady at 4.3%. The report marked the first two consecutive months of positive payroll readings since May 2025. Healthcare showed strong job gains while government, financial, and tech employment declined. Fisher Investments addresses the apparent disconnect between solid jobs data and high-profile corporate layoff announcements tied to AI, noting that Q1 2026 layoffs of over 217,000 actually represented a 56% drop from the same period the prior year. The firm argues that layoff announcements are backward-looking while stocks are forward-looking, and that historical technological shifts tend to displace some jobs while creating new ones in unexpected areas.
Key Insights
- Fisher Investments argues that markets have largely moved on from tariff fears, citing the muted volatility response to the Supreme Court's February ruling compared to the larger correction triggered by the original blanket tariff announcements, and expects a similarly calm reaction to the Section 122 ruling.
- Fisher Investments contends that debt-to-GDP is the wrong metric for assessing US fiscal health because the government does not pay its bills using GDP, and that a more practical measure — interest payments as a share of tax revenue — shows only about 18% of federal tax revenue goes toward debt service, comparable to the late 1980s and early 1990s.
- Fisher Investments points to 10-Year Treasury yields at approximately 4.4%, well below their historic average of 5.8%, as evidence that bond markets do not view US debt levels as a serious risk, arguing that a genuine fiscal crisis would likely produce a sharp spike in yields.
- Fisher Investments notes that Q1 2026 layoffs totaling over 217,000 actually represent a 56% decline from the same period the prior year, when the Trump administration made significant cuts to the federal workforce, suggesting the headline layoff figures are less alarming in context.
- Fisher Investments argues that layoff announcements are backward-looking, reflecting corporate decisions based on past conditions, while stocks are forward-looking and price in expectations for earnings, productivity, and economic activity over the next 3 to 30 months — making layoff-driven changes to long-term strategy rarely wise.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access