The US Midterm Campaign Trends Ken Fisher Is Watching
Ken Fisher analyzes the 2026 US midterm campaign landscape, noting headwinds and tailwinds for both parties. Neither Republicans nor Democrats have a clear unified message, and the cycle is expected to be contentious. Fisher concludes that midterm-driven gridlock is historically positive for markets.
Summary
Ken Fisher opens by noting that primary season is still ongoing but both parties face significant headwinds heading into the fall midterm elections. He observes that this follows the typical midterm pattern where the opposition party to the sitting president tends to gain seats. Republicans face the dual challenge of low party popularity and a president who is also polling poorly, though Fisher acknowledges that the president has historically surprised skeptics, citing his 2024 re-election as an example.
On the financial side of campaigning, Fisher notes that the traditional Democratic fundraising advantage has narrowed considerably. While Democrats will still outspend Republicans, the gap is much smaller than in typical election cycles, which Fisher sees as a relative tailwind for Republicans.
For the Democrats, Fisher identifies their core strategic problem: the party has struggled to coalesce around a positive, actionable message. Their primary message has been anti-Trump, which does carry weight with independents but fails to move the Republican base. Fisher argues Democrats would be better served by articulating a concrete policy platform — 'Put us in power and we'll do this and this and this' — rather than relying solely on opposition framing. He notes Republicans similarly lack a centralized, compelling message, leaving both parties 'staggering' heading into the fall.
Fisher predicts the fall campaign will be ugly, filled with accusations and last-minute revelations. Despite the political turbulence, he concludes on a market-focused note: midterm elections historically produce congressional gridlock, and markets tend to respond positively to gridlock, which he views as the key takeaway for investors.
Key Insights
- Fisher argues that the typical midterm pattern favors the opposition party gaining seats, and Republicans face the additional burden of both the party and the president being unpopular at the same time.
- Fisher claims the traditional Democratic fundraising advantage has significantly narrowed this cycle — Democrats will still spend more, but not by the wide margin seen in previous elections, which he frames as a relative Republican tailwind.
- Fisher argues that the Democrats' over-reliance on an anti-Trump message is strategically insufficient, contending they would be more competitive if they could unify around a concrete, positive policy agenda.
- Fisher observes that neither Republicans nor Democrats have a centralized, coherent message heading into the midterms, leaving both parties without a strong narrative anchor for voters.
- Fisher concludes that midterm elections historically produce congressional gridlock, and that markets tend to respond favorably to gridlock — a dynamic he sees as the primary market-relevant takeaway from the midterm cycle.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] primary season's not over, but both parties have a lot of headwinds and some tailwinds. It's going to be an ugly fall. That's not unusual for a midterm where you normally get the opposition party to the president gaining seats. The Republicans suffer further from the fact that they're not very popular right now and that the president is not very popular right now. On the other hand, the president has pulled a lot of rabbits out of the hat in his career when people didn't think he could, [0:31] including his re-election in 2024. The Republicans also to their advantage this time, relative to the Democrats, who routinely in modern history have had a lot more money to…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Fisher Investments
3 Things You Need to Know This Week | Fed Meeting, US Q2 GDP, Eurozone Inflation (July 27, 2026)
This week's financial markets focus on three major events: the Federal Reserve's July monetary policy meeting where rate decisions are uncertain amid inflation and labor market concerns, the release of US Q2 GDP data which will likely show whether business investment momentum continued, and eurozone inflation data that may reflect energy price spikes from Middle East tensions.
This Week in Review | Market Volatility, Tariffs, SpaceX (July 24, 2026)
This week in review covers three major market developments: recent volatility in stocks and cryptocurrencies driven by geopolitical tensions and AI fears, new tariff announcements from President Trump on Canadian goods and other sectors, and SpaceX's upcoming earnings report alongside insider lockup expirations that could create share supply pressure.
The Potential Market Impact of the UK's New Prime Minister
Andy Burnham has secured over 80% support from Labour Party members to become the next UK Prime Minister. Despite inheriting challenges from Starmer's tenure and facing internal party divisions, the lack of required elections until 2029 and low market expectations position this as potentially positive for markets.
Ken Fisher: Euphoric Market Tops Have This Telltale Sign
Ken Fisher distinguishes between market froth and true euphoria in tech markets, arguing that high valuations of established AI companies like SpaceX don't constitute euphoria by themselves. True euphoria is marked by a specific telltale sign: the creation of new entities specifically designed to capitalize on the froth, rather than established companies that may be overpriced.
Ken Fisher Talks AI Advice, Inflation vs. Wages, Stock Selection and More
Ken Fisher addresses four investor questions covering AI's role in financial advice, the inflation-wage lag cycle, US dollar dynamics, and his stock selection methodology. He emphasizes that AI is a useful tool like any information source, explains why inflation outpacing wages is a normal cyclical pattern, and describes his approach to finding stocks that perform slightly better than their peer group.