The US Midterm Campaign Trends Ken Fisher Is Watching
Ken Fisher analyzes the 2026 US midterm campaign landscape, noting headwinds and tailwinds for both parties. Neither Republicans nor Democrats have a clear unified message, and the cycle is expected to be contentious. Fisher concludes that midterm-driven gridlock is historically positive for markets.
Summary
Ken Fisher opens by noting that primary season is still ongoing but both parties face significant headwinds heading into the fall midterm elections. He observes that this follows the typical midterm pattern where the opposition party to the sitting president tends to gain seats. Republicans face the dual challenge of low party popularity and a president who is also polling poorly, though Fisher acknowledges that the president has historically surprised skeptics, citing his 2024 re-election as an example.
On the financial side of campaigning, Fisher notes that the traditional Democratic fundraising advantage has narrowed considerably. While Democrats will still outspend Republicans, the gap is much smaller than in typical election cycles, which Fisher sees as a relative tailwind for Republicans.
For the Democrats, Fisher identifies their core strategic problem: the party has struggled to coalesce around a positive, actionable message. Their primary message has been anti-Trump, which does carry weight with independents but fails to move the Republican base. Fisher argues Democrats would be better served by articulating a concrete policy platform — 'Put us in power and we'll do this and this and this' — rather than relying solely on opposition framing. He notes Republicans similarly lack a centralized, compelling message, leaving both parties 'staggering' heading into the fall.
Fisher predicts the fall campaign will be ugly, filled with accusations and last-minute revelations. Despite the political turbulence, he concludes on a market-focused note: midterm elections historically produce congressional gridlock, and markets tend to respond positively to gridlock, which he views as the key takeaway for investors.
Key Insights
- Fisher argues that the typical midterm pattern favors the opposition party gaining seats, and Republicans face the additional burden of both the party and the president being unpopular at the same time.
- Fisher claims the traditional Democratic fundraising advantage has significantly narrowed this cycle — Democrats will still spend more, but not by the wide margin seen in previous elections, which he frames as a relative Republican tailwind.
- Fisher argues that the Democrats' over-reliance on an anti-Trump message is strategically insufficient, contending they would be more competitive if they could unify around a concrete, positive policy agenda.
- Fisher observes that neither Republicans nor Democrats have a centralized, coherent message heading into the midterms, leaving both parties without a strong narrative anchor for voters.
- Fisher concludes that midterm elections historically produce congressional gridlock, and that markets tend to respond favorably to gridlock — a dynamic he sees as the primary market-relevant takeaway from the midterm cycle.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] primary season's not over, but both parties have a lot of headwinds and some tailwinds. It's going to be an ugly fall. That's not unusual for a midterm where you normally get the opposition party to the president gaining seats. The Republicans suffer further from the fact that they're not very popular right now and that the president is not very popular right now. On the other hand, the president has pulled a lot of rabbits out of the hat in his career when people didn't think he could, [0:31] including his re-election in 2024. The Republicans also to their advantage this time, relative to the Democrats, who routinely in modern history have had a lot more money to…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Fisher Investments
Has This Bull Market Run Too Far, Too Fast?
Ken Fisher argues that the current bull market since October 2022 has not run too far or too fast, returning about 20% annually compared to the long-term average of 10%. He explains that this comparison is misleading because the 10% long-term average includes both bull and bear markets, while bull markets alone average 23% annually, making the current bull market actually slightly subdued for a bull market.
3 Things You Need to Know This Week | Fed Minutes, Housing Market, Fraud Prevention (Aug. 17, 2026)
This week's financial priorities focus on the Fed's July meeting minutes (Wednesday), July housing market data (Tuesday), and rising financial fraud concerns. While investors seek clues about potential rate hikes and worry about housing weakness, broader market drivers remain strong and much negative sentiment is already priced in.
This Week in Review | US Inflation, Midterm Primaries, Q2 Earnings (Aug. 14, 2026)
This Week in Review covers July's cooling CPI data (3.4% YoY), the midterm election cycle and its historically positive market implications, and broad-based Q2 earnings growth driven by more than just AI investments. The episode emphasizes staying disciplined through political uncertainty and recognizing earnings strength across multiple sectors and geographies.
Fisher Investments’ Founder, Ken Fisher, Debunks: “Who Needs Foreign?”
Ken Fisher argues that including foreign stocks in an investment portfolio provides better diversification and lower volatility than owning only U.S. stocks, despite recent U.S. market outperformance. He contends that historically, U.S. and non-U.S. stocks deliver similar long-term returns, with performance leadership alternating between regions over 10-15 year cycles.
3 Things You Need to Know This Week | US Inflation, UK GDP, RBA (August 10, 2026)
This week's episode discusses key economic indicators including US inflation, UK GDP growth, and the Reserve Bank of Australia's interest rate policy. The outlook suggests inflation fears may be overstated, with a resilient UK economy and a cautious watch on Australian rate hikes.