Ken Fisher: Don’t Fall for This Wartime Investment Mistake
Ken Fisher argues that defense stocks do not perform as many investors expect during geopolitical conflicts. He explains that brief spikes in defense stocks at the start of a conflict typically fade and often lead to underperformance from the conflict's onset. Only unexpected, material increases in global defense spending drive sustained gains in defense stocks.
Summary
In this short commentary, veteran investor Ken Fisher addresses a common misconception about defense stock performance during geopolitical conflicts. He opens by referencing his longstanding characterization of the stock market as 'the great humiliator,' a term he says he has used for decades to describe the market's tendency to confound investor expectations.
Fisher focuses specifically on the behavior of defense stocks when geopolitical tensions or armed conflicts emerge. He notes that while there is typically a brief, sharp rise in defense stocks at the onset of a conflict, this rally is usually short-lived. In most cases, defense stocks subsequently underperform and often end up below where they were at the start of the conflict — a pattern he says has played out in the context of the Iranian conflict referenced in the video.
Fisher then explains what actually drives sustained, meaningful gains in defense stocks: an unexpected and material increase in defense spending, not just in the United States but globally. He emphasizes that it is the surprise element of increased defense budgets — spending above and beyond what markets had already priced in — that creates the conditions for a lasting rally in defense sector equities. A short-duration military conflict, by contrast, does not provide that fundamental catalyst.
He concludes by reinforcing his core message: defense stocks do not behave the way most investors hope or expect when a conflict begins, and falling for that assumption is a mistake he urges investors to avoid.
Key Insights
- Fisher argues that the stock market functions as 'the great humiliator,' designed to confound as many investors as possible — a characterization he says he has held for decades.
- Fisher claims that when geopolitical conflicts begin, defense stocks experience only a brief, sharp spike that typically does not last long before reversing.
- Fisher asserts that defense stocks during the Iranian conflict followed the typical pattern, ultimately underperforming from the beginning of the conflict — not just afterward.
- Fisher argues that what actually drives sustained gains in defense stocks is an unexpected, material increase in defense spending on a global basis — not merely the outbreak of a conflict.
- Fisher emphasizes that it is the surprise element of defense spending increases — above and beyond what was previously expected — that is the necessary ingredient for a lasting rally in defense stocks.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] Remember that I've always said I mean when I say always, for decades I've said that the stock market is what I call the great humiliator. Wanting to humiliate as many people as possible. One of the things that people always think as geopolitical issues arise is that this should help defense stocks. If the geopolitical issues arise in a conflict in a spurt there's a very brief sharp rise in defense stocks. It typically doesn't last long and then [0:31] they underperform and in not too long they usually underperform from the beginning of the conflict. That's basically what's happened this time with the Iranian conflict. The thing that really impacts defense stocks is is there a future…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Fisher Investments
This Week in Review | Oil Prices, UK Politics, Tech Stocks (June 26, 2026)
This Week in Review covers three major market developments: oil prices falling to pre-war levels around $72/barrel following US-Iran agreement fragility, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's resignation with Andy Burnham expected to succeed him, and a tech stock pullback driven by concerns about AI spending outpacing profit growth.
Private Credit and the Next Bear Market
Ken Fisher argues that private credit, despite widespread discussion, is already priced into markets and therefore unlikely to be the primary cause of the next bear market. He explains that bear markets are typically triggered by unexpected, undiscussed factors, and that private credit problems would only emerge as a reactive consequence during the late stages of a recession.
Ken Fisher: What Really Causes Inflation
Ken Fisher argues that inflation is fundamentally caused by excess money creation, not by rising prices of individual goods like oil. While oil price increases may temporarily affect costs in the short term, they ultimately cause substitution effects rather than systemic inflation when the money supply remains stable.
3 Things You Need to Know This Week | Global PMIs, US PCE Inflation, Annuities (June 22, 2026)
This episode covers three key financial topics: June PMI data releases across major economies that could surprise positively given low expectations, US PCE inflation data that is unlikely to broaden significantly despite recent headline increases, and a cautionary analysis of annuities in retirement accounts, arguing that long-term growth potential typically outweighs the appeal of guaranteed income.
This Week in Review | Fed Rate Decision, US-Iran, Inflation in Europe (June 19, 2026)
Fisher Investments' weekly review covers the Fed's first meeting under new Chairman Kevin Warsh, a US-Iran memorandum of understanding that could reopen the Strait of Hormuz, and rising inflation data in the Eurozone. The segment argues that markets have already priced in geopolitical risks and that energy-driven inflation is likely temporary, supporting the ongoing bull market.