Ken Fisher: Don’t Fall for This Wartime Investment Mistake
Ken Fisher argues that defense stocks do not perform as many investors expect during geopolitical conflicts. He explains that brief spikes in defense stocks at the start of a conflict typically fade and often lead to underperformance from the conflict's onset. Only unexpected, material increases in global defense spending drive sustained gains in defense stocks.
Summary
In this short commentary, veteran investor Ken Fisher addresses a common misconception about defense stock performance during geopolitical conflicts. He opens by referencing his longstanding characterization of the stock market as 'the great humiliator,' a term he says he has used for decades to describe the market's tendency to confound investor expectations.
Fisher focuses specifically on the behavior of defense stocks when geopolitical tensions or armed conflicts emerge. He notes that while there is typically a brief, sharp rise in defense stocks at the onset of a conflict, this rally is usually short-lived. In most cases, defense stocks subsequently underperform and often end up below where they were at the start of the conflict — a pattern he says has played out in the context of the Iranian conflict referenced in the video.
Fisher then explains what actually drives sustained, meaningful gains in defense stocks: an unexpected and material increase in defense spending, not just in the United States but globally. He emphasizes that it is the surprise element of increased defense budgets — spending above and beyond what markets had already priced in — that creates the conditions for a lasting rally in defense sector equities. A short-duration military conflict, by contrast, does not provide that fundamental catalyst.
He concludes by reinforcing his core message: defense stocks do not behave the way most investors hope or expect when a conflict begins, and falling for that assumption is a mistake he urges investors to avoid.
Key Insights
- Fisher argues that the stock market functions as 'the great humiliator,' designed to confound as many investors as possible — a characterization he says he has held for decades.
- Fisher claims that when geopolitical conflicts begin, defense stocks experience only a brief, sharp spike that typically does not last long before reversing.
- Fisher asserts that defense stocks during the Iranian conflict followed the typical pattern, ultimately underperforming from the beginning of the conflict — not just afterward.
- Fisher argues that what actually drives sustained gains in defense stocks is an unexpected, material increase in defense spending on a global basis — not merely the outbreak of a conflict.
- Fisher emphasizes that it is the surprise element of defense spending increases — above and beyond what was previously expected — that is the necessary ingredient for a lasting rally in defense stocks.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] Remember that I've always said I mean when I say always, for decades I've said that the stock market is what I call the great humiliator. Wanting to humiliate as many people as possible. One of the things that people always think as geopolitical issues arise is that this should help defense stocks. If the geopolitical issues arise in a conflict in a spurt there's a very brief sharp rise in defense stocks. It typically doesn't last long and then [0:31] they underperform and in not too long they usually underperform from the beginning of the conflict. That's basically what's happened this time with the Iranian conflict. The thing that really impacts defense stocks is is there a future…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Fisher Investments
This Week in Review | Market Volatility, Cryptocurrencies, Roth Conversions (Sept. 25, 2026)
This Week in Review covers three major financial topics: stock market volatility driven by AI concerns and bond yields, Bitcoin's recent rally above $86,000 despite remaining below its October peak, and the strategic considerations for Roth IRA conversions as a tax planning tool.
What Equity Supply Is Signaling Now
Equity supply monitoring is important for understanding stock market pricing dynamics. Currently, equity supply growth is not problematic because IPO activity has cooled following SpaceX's underperformance, and M&A stock-based deals remain limited.
Ken Fisher: Will Stocks Finish Strong in 2026?
Ken Fisher explains the 'midterm miracle,' a historical pattern showing that the fourth quarter of a U.S. president's second year and the two subsequent quarters have demonstrated approximately 95% profitability over the past 100 years. He attributes this to reduced political risk aversion after midterm elections when the opposition gains power, limiting the president's ability to pass major legislation.
One Market Risk Ken Fisher Is Watching
Ken Fisher identifies a significant unpriced market risk: the absence of a classic bear market coupled with a business cycle recession for 17 years, which means necessary economic 'house cleaning' hasn't occurred. He argues that the biggest risks are often those we cannot anticipate, not the widely-discussed ones already priced into markets.
3 Things You Need to Know This Week | Diplomatic Events, PMIs, Consumer Sentiment (Sept. 21, 2026)
This episode covers three major topics affecting markets: diplomatic meetings between world leaders that rarely produce immediate economic impact, September PMI data showing continued economic expansion across major developed economies, and declining US consumer sentiment that may create opportunities if reality exceeds low expectations.