The Great Nicobar Project | India's BIGGEST Environmental Disaster | Dhruv Rathee
Dhruv Rathee investigates the Indian government's ₹81,000 crore Great Nicobar mega-project, arguing it will cause massive ecological destruction including decimating leatherback turtle nesting grounds, coral reefs, and endangering the isolated Shompen tribe. He debunks the government's national security justification that the project would allow India to 'choke' the Strait of Malacca, calling it a fabricated excuse to benefit corporate interests like Adani Ports.
Summary
The video opens by highlighting the leatherback sea turtle, an endangered species that has survived since the dinosaurs, whose primary nesting ground in India is Galathea Bay on Great Nicobar Island. The Modi government's ₹81,000 crore mega-project threatens to destroy 90% of the turtles' nesting sites. The project consists of four components: an International Container Trans-Shipment Terminal, a dual-use military and civilian airport, a 450 MVA power plant, and a commercial township intended to house 3.5 to 6.5 lakh people.
Rathee systematically exposes what he calls government lies about the project's environmental impact. While the government claims only 1.82% of forest area will be cut, this figure refers to the entire Andaman and Nicobar Islands chain — on Great Nicobar Island alone, it represents 15% of the area. The government estimates 7.11 lakh trees will be felled, but independent researchers put the number as high as 1 crore trees. The project would also destroy over 16,150 coral colonies, which scientists say cannot be successfully relocated. The Shompen tribe, with a population of only 229 as of the 2011 census, faces existential risk from disease exposure and habitat destruction, prompting 13 genocide experts and Survival International to warn of potential genocide.
The video details how the government allegedly circumvented legal environmental protections to approve the project. The Forest Rights Act process was improperly followed — the sub-divisional committee lacked proper scheduled tribe representation, and the approving Gram Sabha contained no Adivasi members. The Environmental Impact Assessment was completed in just 6 to 7 days instead of the usual months or years, with negative findings excluded. Galathea Bay's wildlife sanctuary status was quietly de-notified in January 2021, and coral reef data was removed from government maps between 2020 and 2021 to obscure the scale of destruction.
The bulk of Rathee's argument dismantles the national security framing used to justify the project. He argues that India cannot choke the Strait of Malacca from Great Nicobar because the island sits in the Andaman Sea, 200–300 km from the strait's entrance, while the actual choke points are near Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia. He further argues that China has already developed multiple alternative routes — including the China-Myanmar pipelines, CPEC through Pakistan, Central Asian land routes, Arctic shipping lanes, and alternative sea straits like Sunda and Lombok — making any Malacca blockade strategically ineffective. He also points out that India already has naval infrastructure at INS Baaz and the Tri-Services Command Centre in Port Blair.
Rathee concludes by questioning the government's actual motives, noting that project plans include casinos, resorts, and entertainment clusters across 149 of the 166 square kilometers. He connects the project to Adani Ports, one of 11 companies that expressed interest in building it, and frames the destruction as part of a broader pattern of exploiting natural resources and indigenous communities for corporate benefit. He calls on the judiciary to intervene and urges viewers to sign a petition opposing the project.
Key Insights
- The government claims only 1.82% of forest area will be cut, but Rathee argues this figure is calculated against the entire Andaman and Nicobar Islands chain — when measured against Great Nicobar Island alone, it represents 15% of the island's forest area, and independent researchers estimate up to 1 crore trees will be felled rather than the government's figure of 7.11 lakh.
- Rathee argues that India physically cannot choke the Strait of Malacca from Great Nicobar Island because the island sits in the Andaman Sea — a vast open water body — while the actual choke points of the strait are near Singapore and Malaysia, roughly 200–300 km away, controlled by Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia, not India.
- The government allegedly manipulated its own maps: the National Center for Sustainable Coastal Management's 2020 map of Great Nicobar showed coral reefs along the coast, but by 2021 those corals had completely disappeared from the updated map, which Rathee argues was done intentionally to obscure the scale of ecological destruction required for project approval.
- Thirteen genocide experts published a letter calling the project a 'death sentence' for the Shompen tribe, whose population was only 229 in the 2011 census and who have no immunity to outside diseases — Rathee draws a direct parallel to the mass deaths of American indigenous peoples upon European contact.
- Rathee argues the national security framing is contradicted by the Modi government's own behavior: after China occupied Indian land in Ladakh and 20 soldiers died at Galwan, Modi did not publicly mention China, and a Bollywood film referencing the Galwan battle was renamed to remove references to China after Chinese media objected — suggesting the government lacks the political will to confront China that the Malacca choke-point narrative implies.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access