InsightfulStory

Blake Scholl: Breaking the Supersonic Ban

Y Combinator Startup Podcast50m 1s

Blake Scholl, founder of Boom Supersonic, discusses building the first independently developed supersonic jet (XB-1), breaking regulatory barriers to legalize supersonic flight in the US, and how applying software development principles to hardware manufacturing can reduce costs and accelerate iteration in aerospace. He emphasizes the importance of working on problems you love, building in public to inspire others, and challenging the assumption that good ideas always get built quickly.

Summary

Blake Scholl opens by highlighting a 50-year stagnation in aviation speed and innovation, contrasting the rapid progress of the jet age (1960s-1970s) with modern aircraft that fly no faster than their predecessors. He argues this represents a broader failure to pursue meaningful technological advancement.

Scholl traces his path to founding Boom Supersonic, explaining that after initial skepticism from investors like Jeff Bezos (who claimed only large companies could build airliners), he pursued the vision anyway with a software engineering background and pilot's license as his only aerospace credentials. The company built XB-1, a test aircraft that became the first independently developed jet to break the sound barrier in 2023, over a decade after the company's founding.

A major breakthrough came from solving the sonic boom problem through "Mach Cutoff"—breaking the sound barrier at high altitude and specific speeds so the sonic boom turns upward and never reaches the ground. This single technical achievement transformed the regulatory landscape: within 24 hours of the flight, Scholl was invited to the White House, and within 115 days, an executive order legalized supersonic flight in the US. Subsequently, legislation passed both houses of Congress unanimously.

Scholl details Boom's manufacturing philosophy of applying software development practices to hardware: building tools like "MakeBoom" (aircraft design simulation software) and "Blade Runner" (real-time engine blade design) that compress what took dozens of engineers months into processes executable by small teams in hours. Rather than relying on aerospace suppliers, Boom vertically integrated manufacturing with its own machine shop in Denver, achieving 24-hour turnaround from digital design to prototype parts.

A critical financing innovation was developing "Superpower"—adapting Boom's supersonic engines for ground-based natural gas power generation. This allows the company to sell engines separately, generating test data, reliability metrics, and capital to fund the larger airliner development without needing to predict exact R&D costs upfront.

Scholl emphasizes that the company livestreamed XB-1's supersonic flight via Starlink to millions globally, with the goal of inspiring a new generation of engineers and creators. He argues this public demonstration was essential for both regulatory and cultural change.

In the Q&A, Scholl addresses multiple themes: the false belief that all good ideas get built immediately (supersonic technology existed for decades before Boom started it), the competitive advantage of inventing new manufacturing rather than competing with China at traditional manufacturing, how AI reduces software development costs enabling custom engineering tools, and the importance of hiring early-career talent not yet "destroyed" by legacy aerospace companies.

On regulatory strategy, Scholl contrasts Boom's approach (engaging early with the FAA, making them partners) against Uber's approach (ignoring regulators, building customer demand). He argues context matters: when there's an entrenched opponent using regulation defensively, confrontation works; when building safety-critical infrastructure without a hostile incumbent, collaboration with regulators yields faster approvals.

Scholl discusses his learning process for aerospace: teaching himself through textbooks, Khan Academy, problem sets, and maintaining a "confusion list" to track what he didn't truly understand versus could answer on tests. He emphasizes the difference between surface knowledge and deep understanding.

On career advice, Scholl argues against conventional wisdom: don't work on what you already know (it limits vision), do work on what you love (passion can't be taught), and don't wait for perfect credentials before starting. He credits early experience at Amazon—working on projects Jeff Bezos cared about with significant P&Ls—as formative.

Scholl rejects the premise that hardware requires deep experience to break into, calling it "lies told by old people at big dumb companies." He recommends young engineers build side projects, seek wisdom from experienced practitioners (but don't over-follow it), and pursue one rule: if someone has done it before, call them for advice; if no one has, just go build it.

On work-life balance, Scholl argues for "work-life harmony"—meaningful work shouldn't oppose life but integrate with it. He describes managing Boom while raising three young children, viewing parenting and leadership as synergistic practices.

About this episode

<p>In 1969, we landed on the moon and flew Concorde. Half a century later, we could do neither.</p><p><br /></p><p>Blake Scholl founded Boom Supersonic (YC W16), the startup building America’s first supersonic airliner, to change that. At Startup School 2026, he shares how a cardboard mockup with Office Depot seats became XB-1, the first independently developed jet to break the sound barrier, and why founders have to build for both the worst day and the best day.</p><p><br /></p><p>He also answers founder questions about teaching yourself hard things, breaking into hardware without the right resume, and finding work-life harmony while building something ambitious.</p>

Key Insights

  • Scholl argues that the false belief that all viable technology gets built at the earliest possible moment prevents many founders from pursuing ideas; in reality, supersonic technology was theoretically possible decades before Boom, but nobody simply went and built it.
  • The company achieved rapid regulatory approval (90 minutes for XB-1 flight permit) by positioning the FAA as partners in solving problems rather than adversaries to navigate around, contradicting the startup playbook of ignoring regulators.
  • Boom reduced aerospace development timelines and costs by replacing spreadsheet-based engineering workflows with automated software tools (MakeBoom, Blade Runner) that compress months of multi-disciplinary engineering analysis into minutes of computation.
  • Scholl claims that vertically integrating manufacturing—specifically building in-house machine shops and test facilities—is necessary in aerospace because external suppliers have poor iteration capability, unlike in software where suppliers can accommodate rapid change.
  • The company financed deep tech development by creating a secondary revenue stream (Superpower turbines for ground-based power generation) from the same technology being developed for supersonic aircraft, solving the problem of unpredictable R&D costs in regulated industries.
  • Scholl argues that the competitive advantage against China in manufacturing comes not from competing at labor-intensive traditional manufacturing but from inventing the next wave of manufacturing technology (toolless digital processes) and building it domestically.
  • The public livestream of XB-1 breaking the sound barrier was strategically important not just for inspiration but because demonstrating supersonic flight without audible sonic booms removed the core regulatory objection (the Mach Cutoff phenomenon), enabling rapid legislative change.
  • Scholl claims that self-belief for ambitious projects comes not from initial confidence but from reframing the mental task from 'Can I do this?' to 'How do I do this?' and becoming the person necessary to succeed through the process.

Topics

Supersonic aviation and breaking the sonic boom barrierRegulatory strategy and government engagementManufacturing innovation and vertical integrationSoftware-driven hardware design and iterationStartup funding and financing for deep techCareer development and early-stage talentLong-term vision versus short-term optimizationChallenging conventional wisdom and false beliefs

Transcript

I want to start by saying, Houston, we have a problem. In 1969, we landed on the moon for the first time. And the same year we flew Concorde, the faster than the speed of sound airliner. The future was supposed to be faster and better. We were supposed to look forward to innovation in air and in space. And yet half a century later, we can't go to the moon and we can't fly faster than the speed of sound. And not only have we lost the ability to go fast, we've lost the ability to do things even at any kind of reasonable speed. This was the Wall Street Journal just a couple weeks ago. It now takes…

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

More from Y Combinator Startup Podcast

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.