How a Student's Question Saved This NYC Skyscraper
Engineer Bill LeMessurier discovered a fatal flaw in the newly completed Citicorp Center skyscraper in 1978: quartering winds could cause catastrophic failure, with a 1-in-16 annual probability of collapse. He made the ethical decision to reveal the problem and conduct emergency repairs before hurricane season, saving thousands of lives.
Summary
In 1978, structural engineer Bill LeMessurier discovered that the innovative Citicorp Center skyscraper in Manhattan had a critical design flaw. The building's unique architecture featured four stilts positioned at the center of each face rather than corners to accommodate a church on the site. To support gravity and wind loads, LeMessurier designed a chevron bracing system—diagonal braces that transferred forces down to the stilts. However, the construction contractor had bolted rather than welded these connections to save money, a substitution LeMessurier's team initially approved.
The fatal flaw emerged when LeMessurier received a phone call from a student questioning the column placement and began reconsidering wind loads from all directions, particularly quartering winds hitting building corners. His calculations revealed that diagonal wind loads created 40-60% higher stresses than perpendicular winds, and at the 30th floor, braces needed 14 bolts but only had 4. If those joints failed, the entire building would collapse. Historical weather data showed a 1-in-16 annual chance of a storm strong enough to topple the building if the tuned mass damper (installed for comfort) lost power.
Facing professional ruin but prioritizing public safety, LeMessurier informed the building's chairman. They launched Project Serene, an emergency repair campaign where welders secretly reinforced over 200 joints nightly with steel plates. They positioned strain gauges and coordinated a 10-block evacuation plan with the Red Cross. Fortunately, a newspaper strike provided cover, and Hurricane Ella veered away at the last moment. Repairs were completed in October 1978 at a cost of $4-5 million. The incident remained secret until 1995, after which LeMessurier was praised for his ethical response rather than condemned. The discovery led to updated building codes requiring quartering wind calculations, and tuned mass dampers became standard in tall buildings worldwide.
Key Insights
- LeMessurier's innovative decision to notch all four corners of the tower and place support stilts at the center of each face rather than corners was unprecedented—an engineer deliberately making the structural problem harder to solve an architectural constraint
- When a student questioned the column placement, LeMessurier began analyzing wind loads from all directions including quartering winds, which revealed stresses 40-60% higher than perpendicular winds due to the building's unique structural system
- The substitution of bolts for welds was approved by LeMessurier's team because the gravity loads always compressed the chevron braces, meaning tension only occurred under very high winds—but the team failed to calculate the critical quartering wind scenario
- At the 30th floor, quartering wind analysis showed braces needed 14 bolts but only had 4, and the building faced a 1-in-16 annual probability of collapse if a major storm knocked out power to the tuned mass damper
- LeMessurier considered ending his own life rather than face the consequences of revealing the flaw, but decided there was never any other choice but to act given that thousands of lives were at risk
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] This is Citicorp Center. In the summer of 1978, it had been open for less than a year when its structural engineer, Bill LeMessurier, made a terrifying discovery. His cutting edge skyscraper, an engineering marvel had a fatal flaw. Winds of just 110 kilometers per hour could cause it to collapse in the middle of Manhattan, potentially killing thousands. Over 200,000 people lived and worked in the surrounding area, and hurricane season was only weeks away. [0:30] Here I am, the only man in the world who knew this. This thing is in real trouble. LeMessurier faced a stark choice. He could stay silent and hope for the best, or he could try to fix it and risk professional…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Veritasium
How much LSD should you give an elephant?
The video explores why drug dosage doesn't scale linearly with animal mass, using the tragic case of Tusco the elephant to introduce scaling laws in biology. It explains Kleiber's law (metabolic rate scales as mass^3/4), the WBE theory that explains this through fractal network geometry, and how similar scaling principles apply to cities and human lifespans.
The Most Controversial Thought Experiment In Physics
This transcript explains Schrödinger's Cat, a famous quantum mechanics thought experiment where a cat in a sealed box exists in a superposition of being both alive and dead simultaneously until the box is opened and measured. The experiment illustrates the counterintuitive nature of quantum superposition when scaled up to macroscopic objects.
Why Waves Travel Faster At The Top
A controlled wave pool demonstrates fundamental wave physics, revealing that water molecules travel in circular paths with motion decreasing at depth, and that molecules move faster at the top of their loops, causing them to drift forward. The video also explains how irregular waves with multiple frequencies behave differently than regular single-frequency waves, with lower frequency waves traveling faster and overtaking higher frequency waves.
The Google Interview Question Everyone Gets Wrong
A video explores the famous Google interview question about being shrunk to nickel-size in a blender with 60 seconds before the blades start. Various interviewees propose creative survival strategies, but the video suggests their answers are inadequate.
How does light 'know' the shortest path?
The transcript explains that light takes the fastest path between two points, similar to how a person would optimally balance running and swimming to rescue someone. However, the counterintuitive truth is that light—and all particles—actually explore all possible paths simultaneously, with the observed path being a remarkable illusion.