TechnicalDiscussion

Сравнение Claude Code, Gemini и Codex — тесты на контент, анализ и изображения

The speaker is comparing AI coding assistants — Claude Code, Gemini, and Codex — by testing their ability to create image-generation agents. Each tool is being evaluated on how well it writes prompts and structures sub-agents for text-to-image and image-to-image tasks.

Summary

The transcript covers a live comparison test of three AI coding tools: Claude Code, Gemini (referred to as 'Rin'), and Codex. The speaker is evaluating how each tool handles the creation of an image-generation agent, specifically one that can distinguish between text-to-image and image-to-image workflows.

The speaker notes that one of the tools (likely Codex or Gemini) has already written a working prompt and registered a sub-agent in its framework, with a detailed English-language prompt that the speaker personally prefers. The speaker appreciates that this tool clearly divided the use cases — separating text-to-image and image-to-image modes — and wrote specific instructions for each.

At the time of recording, Claude Code is still processing and has been working longer than the others. The speaker is waiting to see whether Claude Code will also produce its own sub-agent. The overall tone is observational and comparative, with the speaker reserving final judgment until all three tools complete their tasks.

Key Insights

  • The speaker prefers detailed English-language prompts, arguing that tools cope better with tasks when the prompt is more thorough and specific.
  • One of the tools (likely Codex or Gemini) distinguished between text-to-image and image-to-image modes and wrote separate instructions for each use case, which the speaker highlighted as a positive structural decision.
  • The speaker notes that a sub-agent was successfully registered in 'Rin' (Gemini) using a detailed specifier, suggesting the tool handled agent architecture correctly.
  • Claude Code was taking longer to complete the agent creation task compared to the other tools at the time of the test.
  • By approximately the 1:02 mark, all three tools had each created an agent, though the speaker was still waiting on Claude Code to confirm whether it had produced its own sub-agent.

Topics

Comparison of Claude Code, Gemini, and CodexAI agent creation for image generationText-to-image vs image-to-image task handlingPrompt quality and detail evaluationSub-agent registration and architecture

Transcript

[0:01] He said that it was okay that he had added a new sapagent to the image creator and had written a working prompt for it. How did you register an agent in Rin? Created a detailed specifier. Okay, let's now enter the codex as well . Here is the code of clow. And here he said that he has special agents here in the special agent. So, the code has already been written here, look, the promt is more detailed in [0:31] English. I somehow like it better, because here, when there is a detailed prompt, it copes better. He described the tasks, that is, tek to image, that we use tek to image. When we image to image,…

Full transcript available for MurmurCast members

Sign Up to Access

More from Игорь Зуевич

Get AI summaries like this delivered to your inbox daily

Get AI summaries delivered to your inbox

MurmurCast summarizes your YouTube channels, podcasts, and newsletters into one daily email digest.