Why Trend Following Is Harder Than It Looks | Systematic Investor | Ep.405
Rob Carver and Niels Castellen discuss trend following challenges, examining why chasing recent performance is problematic, the risks of AI-driven backtesting and overfitting, and analyzing research showing how different asset classes contribute to trend-following returns across market regimes.
Summary
In this episode of the Systematic Investor series, Rob Carver and Niels Castellen explore several critical topics affecting trend-following strategies. They begin with market updates and observations, noting that recent optimistic pricing of geopolitical events has already been factored into markets, and discuss concerns about data quality degradation due to government budget cuts. They address a listener question about portfolio optimization, with Rob arguing against using drawdown metrics and favoring simpler approaches like Sharpe ratio and skew for strategy allocation decisions. The hosts examine two research papers: the Alpha Architect piece on factor concentration, showing that despite hundreds of documented factors, only a handful of 'species' truly explain returns, and a Substack post on trend-following's equity risk premium exposure. They debate whether trend-following portfolios should be adjusted based on their net-long equity bias depending on overall portfolio context. A significant discussion covers the CFTC's approval of perpetual futures contracts in crypto markets—effectively daily-settling futures without expiration dates—and the CME's legal response, raising concerns about market structure, hedging functionality, and industry implications. The centerpiece is a detailed analysis of Quantica's research paper comparing trend-following performance across three decades, revealing that the 2010-2019 period dominated by fixed income was anomalous, while the current commodity-driven regime (2020-2026) represents a return to historical patterns of diversified sources of returns. Rob emphasizes that continuous trend-strength systems naturally allocate toward stronger trends without requiring dynamic regime shifts. Finally, they address the growing problem of AI-generated backtest results and overfitting, with Rob arguing that the research process and robust testing methodology matter more than whether AI generates initial ideas, and that due diligence should focus on process rather than tool-specific concerns.
Key Insights
- Carver argues against using drawdown depth and duration as meaningful statistics for evaluating individual strategies because drawdowns scale predictably with strategy performance and backtest duration, making them redundant when Sharpe ratio is already evaluated.
- The Quantica research reveals that trend-following returns concentrated in fixed income during 2010-2019 was a regime anomaly driven by predictable central bank actions, not diversification, suggesting this period does not represent the historical norm for factor contributions.
- Perpetual futures fundamentally change market structure by eliminating the need to roll contracts and reducing arbitrage between futures and spot prices, but potentially remove the critical price discovery mechanism that hedgers (farmers, producers) depend on for risk management.
- Carver contends that using AI to generate trading strategy ideas is acceptable, but the critical factor is the robust testing process that follows, which should remain identical whether the idea originated from AI, data mining, or chart observation—the source matters less than methodological rigor.
- Continuous trend-strength systems already naturally position portfolios to benefit from stronger trends by asset class, making explicit dynamic regime shifts unnecessary and potentially harmful through overcomplication and overfitting risks.
Topics
Transcript
[0:01] Welcome to Top Traders Unplugged. In markets, success doesn't come from predicting what happens next. It comes from being prepared for what you can't predict. In each episode, we go deep with some of the world's most thoughtful minds in investing, economics, and beyond to understand how they think, how they prepare, and how they decide, and the experiences that shaped how they see the world. No noise, no shortcuts, just real conversations to help you think better and invest with confidence. [0:35] Welcome or welcome back to this week's edition of the systematic investor series with Rob Carver and I, Neilles Castellen, where each week we take the polls of the global market through the lens of a…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Top Traders Unplugged
Why alpha is uncomfortable ft. Andrew Beer and Eric Crittenden
Achieving alpha in investing requires uncomfortable algorithmic discipline that forces traders to take positions against their natural instincts and social consensus. Success demands strict risk controls to manage the lumpy, volatile nature of alpha-generating strategies.
Michael Pettis: The Trade Reckoning Has Barely Begun | Global Macro | Ep.102
Michael Pettis discusses the persistent trade imbalances in the global economy, emphasizing the challenges posed by U.S. deficits and Chinese surpluses. He warns that failure to address these imbalances could lead to serious economic repercussions, particularly for Europe and the global trading system.
The pros and cons of complex vs simple trading systems ft. Andrew Beer and Eric Crittenden
Complex trading systems often appear superior in backtested data but fail to generalize to new market conditions, whereas simpler systems demonstrate better real-world performance and adaptability. The speaker emphasizes that theoretical model performance diverges significantly from live trading results when substantial capital is deployed.
What does CTA mean? ft. Andrew Beer and Eric Crittenden
CTA (Contrarian Tactical Alpha) is redefined as a strategy that succeeds not through trend following, but through contrarian positioning in various markets. The strategy complements strategic consensus beta portfolios by making tactical, counter-intuitive bets when assets are undervalued or unpopular.
Why you must invest for your personality ft. Andrew Beer and Eric Crittenden
The speaker emphasizes that successful long-term investment strategies must align with one's personal values and personality traits. Since investors must commit to and defend their approach for decades, it is essential that their investment philosophy be congruent with their ethical beliefs and psychological comfort.