Mating Crisis: Why The Rate Of Single Men Looking For Dates Has Declined | William Costello PT 1
William Costello, an evolutionary psychologist from UT Austin, discusses the modern 'mating crisis' with host Tom Bilyeu, exploring how women's educational and economic gains have skewed the dating market, reduced the pool of 'eligible' men by female standards, and created cascading effects including declining birth rates, relationship dissatisfaction, and broader societal instability. The conversation frames these dynamics through an evolutionary psychology lens, examining how ancestral mate preferences clash with a radically novel modern environment.
Summary
The conversation opens with statistics on male sexlessness tripling between 2008 and 2018, though Costello notes this has since partially reversed, with women now reporting higher rates of sexlessness post-pandemic. He argues the mating crisis is better understood not as mere sexlessness but as a structural imbalance in the mating market, rooted in an essay by his supervisor Dr. David Buss. Women's rapid educational and economic gains have combined with their evolved hypergamous mate preferences — the tendency to seek equal or higher-status partners — to shrink the pool of men women deem eligible. This scarcity makes the few 'eligible' men less willing to commit, creating a feedback loop of dissatisfaction for both sexes.
Costello discusses how women increasingly freeze their eggs in response to this shortage, and how hypergamy, while declining slightly, still dominates mate preferences. He cites a large EU study showing that relationships where women out-earn or out-educate their partners correlate strongly with higher rates of intimate partner violence, infidelity, anxiety, and depression. This is explained through evolutionary mate retention strategies: men who cannot provision benefits tend to resort to cost-infliction strategies, including emotional abuse, to prevent partners from leaving.
The conversation examines the 'all-or-nothing marriage' concept from Eli Finkel's book, noting that modern partnerships are expected to fulfill every emotional, sexual, and developmental need simultaneously — a historically novel and perhaps unrealistic standard. Historically, partners were 'role mates' chosen within limited local pools, not globally optimized selections via dating apps.
Dating apps are identified as a major accelerant of the mating crisis, reducing people to static data points like height and income, eliminating personality as a compensating factor, and amplifying hypergamous filtering. Costello cites the example that women setting height preferences to 6 feet or above on Hinge reduces their mating pool to just 3% of men. The 'female delusion calculator' data is referenced, showing that combining common female preferences yields a pool of less than 0.5% of men.
The podcast explores the evolutionary psychology of sex differences, noting that the desire for sexual variety is one of the largest effect sizes in psychology — comparable in magnitude to the physical difference in upper body strength between men and women. Women's greater obligatory parental investment historically made casual sex far riskier for them, shaping a more selective sexual psychology, while men evolved a stronger drive for variety.
Historical polygyny is discussed: roughly 83% of known societies have been polygynous, and a dramatic genetic bottleneck around 8,000 years ago saw 17 women reproducing for every one man. The rise of agriculture and resource stockpiling by high-status men created extreme inequality. The cultural norm of monogamy is presented as an adaptive response that redistributed mating opportunities more equitably, pacifying surplus young men and enabling societal flourishing — the basis of Jordan Peterson's 'socially enforced monogamy' argument, which Costello defends as mainstream in evolutionary literature despite public controversy.
The 'young male syndrome' is discussed — surplus unpartnered men historically being redirected into war, exploration, or monasteries. War is described as primarily motivated by the desire to acquire mates, citing the Yanomamo tribe as a direct example. Modern young men are argued to be pacified instead by video games and the internet, which, while problematic, may be preferable to real-world violence.
The episode closes with reflections on evolutionary mismatch: modern culture is changing faster than human psychology can adapt, and denying evolved nature produces predictable dysfunctions. Both host and guest agree the fertility crisis is real, that 80% of childless women are involuntarily so, and that culturally dismissing motherhood and traditional meaning-making without providing robust alternatives risks widespread loss of purpose and fulfillment.
About this episode
<p>Are you ready to unravel the mysteries of modern male behavior? Buckle up for part one of a riveting two-part episode where we delve into the significant behavioral shifts in young men, marked by an increase in recklessness and a trend towards evading long-term commitments.</p> <p>Joining me today is William Costello, an expert on behavioral patterns, writer, researcher, and PhD student at the Evolutionary Psych Lab who will shed light on the rising recklessness, commitment-phobia among young men, and the emerging 'mating crisis'.</p> <p>We'll unpack the 'mating crisis', linking the drop in male commitment to relationships with the surge of women outpacing men in education.</p> <p>But that's not all! We'll also explore how dating apps and the internet have transformed the modern dating scene, giving rise to new socio-cultural phenomena like the 'incel' community.</p> <p>By tuning into this episode, you're signing up for more than just a podcast - you're stepping into a world of knowledge that will empower you to understand societal shifts and navigate your own life better.</p> <p>So, what are you waiting for? Hit that play button and embark on this journey with us. And don't forget to subscribe for more empowering content and knowledge that'll help you level up your life, and leave a review!</p> <p><br /></p> <p><strong>Follow William Costello:</strong></p> <p>Website: <a href="https://william05227.wixsite.com/website" target="_blank">https://william05227.wixsite.com/website</a> </p> <p>Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/CostelloWilliam" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/CostelloWilliam</a> </p> <p><br /></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices" target="_blank">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><p>See Privacy Policy at <a href="https://art19.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://art19.com/privacy</a> and California Privacy Notice at <a href="https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info</a>.</p>
Key Insights
- Costello argues that the mating crisis is not primarily about sexlessness but about structural market imbalance: women's hypergamous preferences combined with their rising educational status have shrunk the pool of men they deem eligible, making those men less willing to commit due to their scarcity value.
- A large EU study of over 21,000 women across 27 countries found that relationships where women out-earn or out-educate their partners are a major risk factor for all types of intimate partner violence, explained through evolutionary mate retention theory.
- Costello cites Pew Research showing that upward of 30% of men are not even seeking romantic or sexual relationships at all, suggesting withdrawal from the mating market is a more significant phenomenon than raw sexlessness statistics capture.
- Women setting height preferences to 6 feet or above on dating apps like Hinge reduces their eligible male pool to just 3% of men, and Costello argues dating apps exacerbate hypergamous filtering by reducing people to static, rankable data points that eliminate personality as a compensating factor.
- The desire for sexual variety is described as one of the largest effect sizes in all of psychology, approximately equal in magnitude to the physical sex difference in upper body strength, and Costello argues it is directly explained by the asymmetry in obligatory parental investment between men and women.
- A genetic bottleneck approximately 8,000 years ago saw 17 women reproducing for every one man, coinciding with the rise of agriculture, which allowed high-status males to stockpile resources and monopolize mates to a degree previously impossible.
- Costello argues that the cultural norm of monogamy evolved as a response to extreme polygynous inequality, redistributing mating access to lower-status men, pacifying surplus male populations, and enabling the societal flourishing observed in cultures that adopted it.
- Costello notes that 33% of women report having engaged in a 'foodie call' — misrepresenting romantic interest in a man in order to receive a free meal — which he argues contributes to male resentment and distrust in the dating market.
- The gender pay gap is characterized by Costello as primarily a 'motherhood penalty': women out-earn men in at least 22 U.S. cities up to age 29, after which the gap emerges precisely when women exit the workforce to have children.
- The Yanomamo tribe, when asked why they go to war, universally cited acquiring mates and brides as the motivation, and Costello argues this drive persists in modern contexts including gang culture and jihadist recruitment, which explicitly promises women to unpartnered young men.
- Costello argues that involved fatherhood's primary evolutionary contribution is risk-encouragement and world-navigation teaching through rough-and-tumble engagement, which he contrasts with female-typical safety-oriented parenting, and that the absence of this influence may contribute to modern youth's excessive risk aversion.
- Costello states that 80% of childless women are involuntarily childless by their own reported desires, reframing the fertility crisis not as a culture-war imposition on women but as a systemic failure to help women achieve what they themselves say they want.
Topics
Transcript
Right now, I want to talk about a bet you're losing every day. Someone says something important in a meeting, a client drops an offhand comment that matters, a teammate floats a half-formed idea, but you know it's gold, and then you bet yourself the same thing every time. I'll remember that. But nine times out of 10, you lose that bet. Everybody does. Your brain wasn't built to retain 40 hours a week of dense conversation. And the cost isn't just a forgotten detail. It's the follow-up you never make, the promise that you don't keep, the connections that slip through your fingers. And Ploud is built to make sure you win that bet every time. It's an AI-powered…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Tom Bilyeu's Impact Theory
Oil Should Be $200 A Barrel Right Now — The Reason It Isn't Is Far Worse Than The War
Oil prices remain far below the predicted $200/barrel despite a major supply shock from the Iran-Hormuz conflict, revealing that global demand—particularly from China—has collapsed due to underlying economic weakness rather than supply constraints. Both China and the US are experiencing severe economic slowdowns masked by prior narrative explanations, signaling a potential recession or depression ahead.
Understanding Socialism’s Historical Failures and America’s Economic Crossroads
Host Tom Abiliu discusses escalating U.S.-Iran conflict, economic deterioration including record labor force exits, the DSA's flawed grocery store policies using Peru's history as a cautionary tale, and China's AI strategy threatening American competitiveness, while emphasizing how historical patterns repeat due to human nature and the dangers of abandoning functional economic systems.
Planned Episode 7/18/2026
The episode discusses how AI abundance could create societal collapse similar to the Mouse Utopia experiment, arguing that humans have evolutionary algorithms requiring meaningful work and struggle. Without external pressures forcing contribution and growth, people will experience depression, social breakdown, and behavioral derangement across generations.
America Is 8 Million Jobs Short — And It's Getting Worse
Jeff Snyder argues the U.S. economy is in depression-like conditions despite stock market highs, caused by a 2021-2022 supply shock that impoverished workers while incomes stagnated. He explains how the Eurodollar system broke in 2007 and advocates for a decentralized digital currency system to restore trust and unlock future prosperity.
Trump Declares War on Iran (again), Inflation Crashes HARD, and ICE Killings Continue | The Tom Bilyeu Show
Tom Bilyeu discusses the paradox of falling CPI inflation driven by weakening demand rather than positive economic factors, analyzes escalating U.S.-Iran military conflict and its geopolitical implications, and highlights emerging technologies in manufacturing, crypto regulation, and AI that could reshape the American economy.