HN837: Agentic AI to Reduce MTTR
Edouard Douleroux discusses practical agentic AI implementation for reducing Mean Time To Recovery (MTTR) in network operations. He describes a deterministic system combining agents, fine-tuned language models, MCP servers, digital twins, and a YAML-based single source of truth to automate incident detection, diagnosis, and resolution testing.
Summary
Edouard Douleroux, an AI startup founder, explains how agentic AI can transform network engineering by elevating engineers from firefighters to system architects rather than replacing them. The core system comprises five specialized agents led by a team leader that processes syslog data to detect incidents and route them to appropriate specialized agents (routing, security, etc.). The architecture relies heavily on a deterministic workflow encoded in YAML files—a "single source of truth" that documents known incidents, their resolutions, troubleshooting procedures, and execution order for MCP tool calls. This prevents the system from making arbitrary decisions and ensures consistency. When an incident is detected, the team leader agent automatically triggers data collection using MCP tools in a predetermined sequence. The collected contextual data feeds into a fine-tuned language model (specialized variants for different domains like BGP, routing, security) that reasons through the data and proposes a solution. Critically, before any change is applied to production, the proposed solution is tested in a digital twin—a one-to-one replica of the network running in containerized environments (Container Lab), automatically synced every 10 minutes from production. If testing succeeds with a confidence score above 0.8, the engineer receives a dashboard report containing the problem, collected evidence, reasoning trace, and validated solution. A compliance officer agent verifies all proposed changes against organizational policies (change windows, freeze periods, etc.) before approval. Douleroux emphasizes that fine-tuning models is the most critical and tedious component of the entire system. The process involves multiple stages: supervised fine-tuning on curated question-answer datasets (requiring tens of thousands of examples), held-out test sets to prevent memorization, evaluation against both the base model and frontier models like GPT-4, and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to align model behavior with organizational preferences. He stresses that high-quality, diverse datasets are essential—showing the model many angles and variations of the same concept so it generalizes rather than memorizes. Models cannot perform mathematical operations natively but learn patterns through examples. He uses open-source models (Qwen, CodeLlama, Mistral) fine-tuned on vendor documentation, best practices, and troubleshooting guides to create vendor-agnostic expertise in networking technologies. The entire system is built using Python scripts and local hardware; Douleroux uses a personal server with 128GB RAM and 8 performance cores for approximately $3,250. He argues that while organizations often avoid investing in proper lab environments (viewing them as unnecessary overhead), the cost of not having testable changes far exceeds the infrastructure investment—companies lose millions per hour during major outages. He advocates that the industry needs public domain models trained on foundational networking knowledge applicable across vendors, while private models handle organization-specific context (AS numbers, IP addresses, firewall rules, internal policies). Agents require strict confinement through both ignorance (limited knowledge in YAML) and policy-based RBAC to prevent unintended actions. He positions agentic AI as complementary to, not replacing, deterministic programming—classical scripts handle well-defined scenarios reliably, while models excel at capturing corner cases and handling unpredictable input variations that would require continuous code updates.
About this episode
Ethan Banks sits down with Eduard Dulharu live at AutoCon 5 to explore how agentic AI can be used to reduce Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR) for complex network environments. Eduard breaks down how these AI agents leverage deterministic workflows and custom fine-tuned models to analyze telemetry and propose solutions. Through the use of agentic<a class="excerpt-read-more" href="https://packetpushers.net/podcasts/heavy-networking/hn837-agentic-ai-to-reduce-mttr/" title="ReadHN837: Agentic AI to Reduce MTTR">... Read more »</a>
Key Insights
- Douleroux argues that agentic AI should promote engineers from firefighters responding to emergencies to system architects making strategic decisions, rather than replacing human engineers.
- The system uses a deterministic workflow encoded in YAML files called the 'single source of truth' that documents all known incidents and their resolutions, preventing agents from making arbitrary decisions.
- A team leader agent automatically processes incoming syslog data in real-time and routes incidents to specialized agents based on incident type using regex matching, eliminating manual triage.
- Proposed solutions are tested in a digital twin (a containerized replica of the production network) before presentation to engineers, reducing risk and providing empirical validation.
- The system generates a confidence score based on data quality, where timestamps and network responses must align precisely with logged events; if confidence exceeds 0.8, the solution is deemed reliable.
- Fine-tuning datasets are the most critical component, requiring tens of thousands of diverse question-answer examples to teach models to generalize patterns rather than memorize specific answers.
- Models cannot perform native mathematical operations but learn to solve problems like subnetting through pattern recognition from many examples, not through algorithmic computation.
- Supervised fine-tuning uses held-out test sets that the model never encounters during training to verify the model generalizes to new questions and doesn't simply memorize training data.
- Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) as a second training stage aligns fine-tuned models with organizational preferences by training them to prefer one response over another for the same input.
- Agents should have strictly limited access and knowledge defined by their YAML configuration—a routing agent shouldn't know about firewalls—making agent behavior predictable to engineers who understand the YAML files.
- Organizations lose millions per hour during major outages, yet often reject the relatively small investment in test infrastructure (two servers costing $3,250-$6,500), prioritizing short-term budget savings over reliability.
- Public domain models should be vendor-agnostic and trained on foundational networking concepts, while private models handle sensitive organizational context (IP addresses, AS numbers, policies) that shouldn't be shared with public models.
Topics
Transcript
If you're managing a messy multi-vendor network that grew for years and there was no plan, you are fighting unpredictability. When something breaks, Meter delivers a complete, predictable network, hardware, software, and services that are consumed as a subscription. The transition's easy. They'll give you upgrade credits. You get a fully managed install and deployment plus 24-7 support. Companies such as Lyft and Bridgewater, Plus 24-7 support companies such as Lyft and Bridgewater. They're meter shops. Go to meter.com slash heavy networking. That's M-E-T-E-R dot com slash heavy networking to book a demo. Welcome to Heavy Networking. I'm Ethan Banks, and I find myself in Munich, Germany for the AutoCon 5 conference put on by the Network Automation Forum. And…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from The Everything Feed - All Packet Pushers Pods
IPB205: Moving to Disable IPv4
Frank Martin discusses the challenges and strategies for disabling IPv4 and deploying IPv6 in enterprise data centers, including operational hurdles, vendor coordination, and cultural change requirements. He introduces drafts on IPv6-only deployment and a retry-over-IPv6 mechanism to safely transition away from IPv4.
N4N061: Your First Wi-Fi Network Part 2
Holly Podbilak and Ethan Banks discuss advanced Wi-Fi technologies in Part 2 of their networking basics series, covering MIMO, OFDMA, MLO, and the evolution from Wi-Fi 4 through Wi-Fi 7, explaining how each technology addresses bandwidth and interference challenges in increasingly dense wireless environments.
TCG081: Network Automation Forum: From Simple Survey to Global Community
Network Automation Forum (NAF) emerged organically from a 2022 survey question about why network automation adoption lags in the industry, evolving into a global community-driven conference series with events across two continents. The founders emphasize that NAF's success stems from its commitment to practitioners-for-practitioners ethos, vendor neutrality, and willingness to listen to community feedback while protecting foundational values.
NAN128: Beyond RAG: Making Network AI Truly Agentic
Julia Santella, a Cisco solutions engineer with a software background, shares research findings on AI adoption in network automation, emphasizing that AI should augment rather than replace deterministic automation, and that critical skills for 2027 include learning to validate AI outputs rather than blindly trusting them.
PP120: News Roundup—AI Giants Praise Open Weight Models, Attackers Capture Captive Portals, a Tricky Mac Attack, and More
A security-focused podcast covering critical vulnerabilities and threats including compromised hotel captive portals stealing Microsoft credentials, OpenAI's AI agent escaping sandbox constraints, industry efforts to protect open-weight AI models, and serious vulnerabilities in server management systems and automotive security.