From the archive: Freedom without constraints: how the US squandered its cold war victory
Andrew Bacevich argues that the United States squandered its Cold War victory by pursuing unconstrained globalization, militarized hegemony, and an expansive but hollow conception of freedom. Rather than yielding peace and prosperity for all, the post-Cold War consensus produced inequality, perpetual war, social dysfunction, and the conditions that led to Trump's 2016 election. Bacevich contends that the deep societal schism exposed by Trump's rise predates him and will outlast his time in office.
Summary
Andrew Bacevich opens by expressing disappointment that the end of the Cold War failed to produce the peace and harmony many Americans expected. Instead, the post-Cold War era brought a succession of costly military conflicts and deepening social problems. He frames the Soviet collapse as a disorienting event: while the U.S. had clearly won, it was left without an enemy, without a coherent worldview, and without the disciplining framework the Cold War had provided.
Bacevich compares America's post-Cold War windfall to a lottery winner suddenly flush with cash — a situation requiring prudence and self-awareness but instead inviting recklessness. With the constraint of the Soviet threat removed, an intoxicated elite devised a four-part consensus: globalized neoliberalism (wealth creation through unconstrained capitalism), global leadership (militarized hegemony to police a U.S.-favorable world order), a radically expanded conception of individual freedom (autonomy without moral obligation), and a quasi-monarchical presidency elevated as the center of national life.
This consensus, Bacevich argues, was based on delusional premises. Globalization enriched some while fostering egregious inequality. Military hegemony produced endless wars rather than dominion. The new conception of freedom, exemplified by Supreme Court Justice Kennedy's formulation that liberty means the right to define one's own concept of existence, removed constraints without promoting the common good and carried a whiff of nihilism. Presidential exaltation yielded a succession of disappointments before culminating in Trump's 2016 election.
To illustrate the social costs of unconstrained freedom, Bacevich presents a sweeping catalogue of American dysfunction circa 2016: epidemic rates of depression, drug addiction, opioid overdoses, suicide, binge drinking, loneliness, incarceration, obesity, and declining social trust. He notes that the U.S. had fallen from 3rd to 13th in world happiness rankings between 2007 and 2016, and that life expectancy for white working-class men was declining — a trend without historical precedent. He argues that while freedom had expanded formally, it often manifested as alienation, compulsive consumption, and despair rather than genuine flourishing.
Bacevich is careful to argue that Trump did not create these conditions — he merely recognized and exploited them with unique skill. Trump functioned as a 'strategic sensor,' reading the grievances of those left behind by the post-Cold War order and positioning himself as their champion. The 2016 election, Bacevich contends, was a turning point comparable in significance to the fall of the Berlin Wall: a mass repudiation by ordinary Americans of a consensus that had served elites while failing them.
He concludes by identifying the deepest divide in American society as being between those who benefited from the post-Cold War trajectory and those who experienced it as decline and betrayal. This schism, rather than Trump's personal character, is what Bacevich believes merits the most serious attention, as it will persist long after Trump himself has left the political stage.
About this episode
We are raiding the Guardian long read archives to bring you some classic pieces from years past, with new introductions from the authors. This week, from 2020: The US believed the American way of life was humankind’s ultimate destiny. But unrestrained greed has led to an era of injustice and division. By Andrew Bacevich. Read by Kelly Burke. Help support our independent journalism at <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/longreadpod">theguardian.com/longreadpod</a>
Key Insights
- Bacevich argues that the end of the Cold War removed a disciplining framework that had provided Americans with a shared sense of purpose and constrained both foreign adventurism and domestic excess, leaving the country without a coherent worldview.
- Bacevich contends that an intoxicated post-Cold War elite devised a four-part consensus — globalized neoliberalism, militarized hegemony, an expansive conception of individual freedom, and a quasi-monarchical presidency — that was built on delusional premises and has since been found wanting on all four counts.
- Bacevich argues that the post-Cold War conception of freedom, exemplified by Justice Kennedy's formulation granting individuals the right to define their own concept of existence, removed moral constraints without promoting virtue, community, or contentment, producing a society marked by nihilism and alienation.
- Bacevich presents extensive data to argue that by 2016, the United States exhibited signs of profound social dysfunction — including record opioid deaths, rising suicide rates, declining life expectancy among working-class white men, epidemic loneliness, and a fall from 3rd to 13th in world happiness rankings — suggesting that expanded formal freedom had not translated into genuine well-being.
- Bacevich argues that Trump did not create the conditions for his own rise; rather, the grievances he exploited had been festering for the quarter-century since the Cold War ended, and establishment politicians of both parties had remained deaf to them.
- Bacevich characterizes Trump as a uniquely skilled 'strategic sensor' rather than a strategic thinker — someone with an intuitive genius for reading the temper of aggrieved voters and stoking their grievances, rather than a person with any coherent policy alternative to the consensus he was repudiating.
- Bacevich argues that the 2016 presidential election was a historical turning point comparable in significance to the fall of the Berlin Wall, representing a mass repudiation by ordinary Americans of the post-Cold War consensus that had served elites while leaving many others behind.
- Bacevich concludes that the deepest and least reconcilable divide in America is between those who benefited from the post-Cold War trajectory and those who experienced it as decline and betrayal, and that this schism — not Trump's personal conduct — is what will define American politics long after Trump is gone.
Topics
Transcript
This is The Guardian. The Guardian Archive Long Read. Hi, my name is Andrew Bacevich. I'm the author of the article, Freedom Without Constraints, How the U.S. Squandered Its Cold War Victory, which appeared in The Guardian back in 2020. The essay explains my disappointment, and I think the disappointment of many Americans, that the end of the Cold War failed to yield the benefits that many of us expected. More than anything else, what surprised me about the end of the Cold War was that the U.S. was not only the end of the Cold War, is that it didn't yield anything approximating peace and harmony for the United States or for the world more broadly. On the contrary,…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from The Audio Long Read
On the trail with the hunters who believe shooting big game can save Africa’s wildlife
Cal Flynn's article explores the paradox of trophy hunting in Africa's Nyassa Special Reserve, where killing wild animals generates revenue that funds conservation efforts. Through firsthand observation of a buffalo hunt and interviews with conservancy director Derek Littleton, Flynn examines how hunting income sustains anti-poaching operations and local communities. The piece questions whether this morally uncomfortable system can or should be replaced, given its apparent effectiveness.
From the archive: Putin, Trump, Ukraine: how Timothy Snyder became the leading interpreter of our dark times
This Guardian Long Read profiles Timothy Snyder, a Yale historian of Eastern Europe who became a prominent public intellectual through his warnings about Trump's authoritarian tendencies and his deep engagement with the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The piece examines his background, his controversial but often prescient predictions, and the tensions between his roles as academic historian and political activist. It also explores criticism from both the left and right about his rhetorical style and ideological positioning.
How to survive the information crisis: ‘We once talked about fake news – now reality itself feels fake’
Guardian Editor-in-Chief Katherine Viner argues that interconnected global crises — environmental, political, economic, and informational — are being driven and compounded by digital technology designed to fragment attention and stoke conflict. She contends that transparently funded, human-centered journalism serves as essential civic infrastructure to counter these forces. The Guardian's reader-supported model is presented as both a practical solution and a political act in defense of shared reality.
Stateside with Kai and Carter: Stacey Abrams on why gutting of the US Voting Rights Act is ‘evil’
Hosts Kai Wright and Carter Sherman of The Guardian's 'Stateside' podcast interview Stacey Abrams about the Supreme Court's gutting of the Voting Rights Act through Louisiana v. Calais. Abrams frames the ruling not as a partisan issue but as a move toward authoritarianism, arguing that while the decision is 'evil,' it has misread the moment and that determination — not optimism — must drive the response. She outlines strategies including court battles, voter registration, coalition building, and ultimately a new constitutional amendment affirming an explicit right to vote.
‘Lawrence is karma’: the gangster who became an icon of Modi’s India
This Guardian Long Read profiles Lawrence Bishnoi, India's most notorious gangster, who has orchestrated high-profile murders and international assassinations from inside a high-security prison. The article explores how Bishnoi rose from a privileged rural background through violent student politics to become a celebrity criminal icon in Modi's India, allegedly with links to the Indian government's covert operations targeting Sikh separatists abroad.