As a teenager, John was jailed for assaulting someone and stealing their bike. That was 17 years ago – will he ever be released?
John Wright, now 34, has spent 17 years in prison for stealing a bike and assaulting someone as a teenager, serving an Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence that was supposed to last less than two years. His indefinite detention has led to severe mental health deterioration, including schizophrenia, and he remains incarcerated despite completing his minimum sentence over a decade ago.
Summary
This article tells the tragic story of John Wright, who at 16 was a quiet, creative teenager who struggled socially and fell in with the wrong crowd. In 2007, he stole a 15-year-old's bike after assaulting the boy in a park and received an Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence with a minimum term of one year and 350 days. The IPP sentence was introduced in 2005 following public outrage over cases like Sarah Payne's murder, designed to detain dangerous offenders indefinitely until they could prove they were no longer a risk to society. John's family believed the minimum term was his full sentence, not understanding he could potentially be detained forever. After completing his tariff in 2009, John was repeatedly denied parole for various infractions including taking spice and involvement in violence. The psychological toll of indefinite detention gradually destroyed his mental health - he developed paranoia, had blackouts, and engaged in erratic behavior. In 2018, he was found catatonic and diagnosed with schizophrenia, requiring transfer to a psychiatric hospital where he underwent electroconvulsive therapy. His condition deteriorated further; he became convinced his food was being poisoned, lost significant weight, and eventually cut off contact with his family entirely. His father died in 2020 without being able to say goodbye. By 2023, John had been returned to prison from the psychiatric hospital, and his location remains unknown to his family. The IPP sentence was abolished in 2012 but this didn't apply retroactively, leaving nearly 3,000 people still serving these indefinite sentences. The article argues that IPPs are fundamentally flawed, with former Home Secretary David Blunkett calling them his biggest regret.
About this episode
Indeterminate sentences are devastating to mental health, but prisoners with mental illness are less likely to be released. The result is a vicious cycle whereby the most vulnerable inmates often have the least chance of getting out – as John’s case shows. By Sophie Atkinson. Help support our independent journalism at <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/longreadpod">theguardian.com/longreadpod</a>
Key Insights
- The IPP sentence system created a situation where prisoners serve time not for crimes they committed, but for crimes parole boards believe they might commit if released
- John's family was never properly informed that his minimum sentence was actually the shortest possible time he could serve, not his maximum sentence
- IPP prisoners became easy targets for violence because fighting back could delay their release indefinitely, while other prisoners with fixed sentences faced no such consequences
- The uncertainty inherent in IPP sentences creates a vicious cycle where the psychological damage from indefinite detention makes prisoners appear more dangerous to parole boards
- Former Home Secretary David Blunkett admits the IPP sentence was his biggest regret and acknowledges the government 'got it wrong' on IPPs
- Self-harm rates among IPP prisoners are more than twice as high as those serving life sentences, according to Prison Reform Trust data
- The original estimate was that about 900 people would serve IPP sentences at any given time, but by abolition in 2012, there were roughly 6,000 IPP prisoners
- Even after release, IPP prisoners face a minimum 10-year license period where they can be recalled to prison for minor breaches, with the entire parole process starting over if recalled
Topics
Transcript
This is The Guardian. As a teenager, John was jailed for assaulting someone and stealing their bike. That was 17 years ago. Will he ever be released? By Sophie Atkinson. At 16, John Wright was the way a lot of teenagers can be. One person at school, another person at home. At school, he was quiet, kept to himself. Behind closed doors, he was playful and chatty. He'd do backflips or cartwheels on the sofa while watching TV, or make silly noises at awkward moments to make his three siblings laugh. He was creative. He loved rapping, making his own beats. He played the guitar, liked drawing. The family would play basketball together, near the sleepy cul-de-sac where they lived.…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from The Audio Long Read
On the trail with the hunters who believe shooting big game can save Africa’s wildlife
Cal Flynn's article explores the paradox of trophy hunting in Africa's Nyassa Special Reserve, where killing wild animals generates revenue that funds conservation efforts. Through firsthand observation of a buffalo hunt and interviews with conservancy director Derek Littleton, Flynn examines how hunting income sustains anti-poaching operations and local communities. The piece questions whether this morally uncomfortable system can or should be replaced, given its apparent effectiveness.
From the archive: Putin, Trump, Ukraine: how Timothy Snyder became the leading interpreter of our dark times
This Guardian Long Read profiles Timothy Snyder, a Yale historian of Eastern Europe who became a prominent public intellectual through his warnings about Trump's authoritarian tendencies and his deep engagement with the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The piece examines his background, his controversial but often prescient predictions, and the tensions between his roles as academic historian and political activist. It also explores criticism from both the left and right about his rhetorical style and ideological positioning.
How to survive the information crisis: ‘We once talked about fake news – now reality itself feels fake’
Guardian Editor-in-Chief Katherine Viner argues that interconnected global crises — environmental, political, economic, and informational — are being driven and compounded by digital technology designed to fragment attention and stoke conflict. She contends that transparently funded, human-centered journalism serves as essential civic infrastructure to counter these forces. The Guardian's reader-supported model is presented as both a practical solution and a political act in defense of shared reality.
Stateside with Kai and Carter: Stacey Abrams on why gutting of the US Voting Rights Act is ‘evil’
Hosts Kai Wright and Carter Sherman of The Guardian's 'Stateside' podcast interview Stacey Abrams about the Supreme Court's gutting of the Voting Rights Act through Louisiana v. Calais. Abrams frames the ruling not as a partisan issue but as a move toward authoritarianism, arguing that while the decision is 'evil,' it has misread the moment and that determination — not optimism — must drive the response. She outlines strategies including court battles, voter registration, coalition building, and ultimately a new constitutional amendment affirming an explicit right to vote.
‘Lawrence is karma’: the gangster who became an icon of Modi’s India
This Guardian Long Read profiles Lawrence Bishnoi, India's most notorious gangster, who has orchestrated high-profile murders and international assassinations from inside a high-security prison. The article explores how Bishnoi rose from a privileged rural background through violent student politics to become a celebrity criminal icon in Modi's India, allegedly with links to the Indian government's covert operations targeting Sikh separatists abroad.