Access denied: why Muslims worldwide are being ‘debanked’
The article examines how post-9/11 anti-terrorism financial regulations have led to widespread 'debanking' of Muslims and Muslim organizations worldwide. Banks, fearing massive fines and liability, systematically close accounts of Muslim individuals, charities, and businesses based on algorithmic risk assessments rather than evidence of wrongdoing.
Summary
The story begins with Hamish Wilson, who runs a Welsh farm hosting Somali visitors to celebrate their culture, but faces banking difficulties due to his Muslim guests' financial transactions. This reveals a broader pattern of financial discrimination against Muslims stemming from post-9/11 regulations. After September 11, 2001, governments worldwide implemented anti-terrorism financing rules through organizations like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), requiring banks to identify and report suspicious transactions or face massive fines. However, these systems fundamentally conflated money laundering (making dirty money clean) with terrorism financing (using clean money for violent purposes). Banks, lacking clear guidance on identifying terrorist financing, relied on vague indicators like 'charitable organizations targeting particular communities' - effectively a dog whistle for Muslim organizations. This led to systematic debanking of Muslim individuals, charities, and businesses across the globe. A 2022 US poll showed over 25% of Muslims reported banking problems, three times higher than other groups. Major banks like HSBC, UBS, and others have closed hundreds of Muslim-focused accounts, often without explanation or appeal process. The author argues this system has failed its primary goal of stopping terrorism while causing immense harm to innocent people. Banks prioritize avoiding fines over serving customers, making debanking decisions based on algorithmic risk assessments rather than actual evidence. The only people who can successfully fight debanking are wealthy or well-connected individuals like Nigel Farage, whose case received media attention and political support. The article concludes that this represents a political failure, as asking profit-driven banks to act as police creates inherent discrimination against those who cannot afford the compliance costs.
About this episode
Innocent people are being frozen out of basic banking services – and it all traces back to reforms rushed through after 9/11 By Oliver Bullough. Read by Elis James. Help support our independent journalism at <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/longreadpod">theguardian.com/longreadpod</a>
Key Insights
- Post-9/11 anti-terrorism financial regulations fundamentally misunderstood the difference between money laundering (making dirty money clean) and terrorism financing (using clean money for violence), yet applied the same detection mechanisms to both
- The Financial Action Task Force's 2002 guidance that terrorist fundraising often involves 'charitable organizations targeting particular communities' became a coded signal for banks to target Muslim organizations
- Banks face massive financial liability for processing terrorist funds, with cases like the Arab Bank lawsuit showing institutions can be held liable for routine transactions even when following all government requirements
- A 2022 US poll revealed that over 25% of Muslim respondents experienced banking problems like account refusal or suspension, more than three times the rate of other religious groups
- Banks use algorithmic risk assessment systems that flag Muslim names, addresses near mosques, or transactions with certain keywords, leading to account closures without human review or explanation
- The system has failed its primary objective, as terrorist groups have spread globally and the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan, while millions of innocent people face financial exclusion
- Only wealthy or well-connected individuals like Nigel Farage can successfully fight debanking decisions, as they have the media and political connections needed to embarrass banks into reversing decisions
- Between 2015 and 2022, annual account closures in the UK rose from 45,091 to 343,350, demonstrating the massive scale of the debanking phenomenon across all communities
Topics
Transcript
This is The Guardian. Welcome to The Guardian Long Read, showcasing the best long-form journalism covering culture, politics and new thinking. For the text version of this and all our Long Reads, go to theguardian.com forward slash long read. Access Denied. Why Muslims worldwide are being debunked by Oliver Bullough. Read by Ellis James. Hamish Wilson lives a few miles away from me in a cosy farmhouse in the damp hills of Mid Wales. He makes good coffee, tells great stories, and is a great man. He's an excellent host. Every summer, dozens of Somali guests visit Wilson's farm as part of a wonderfully wholesome project set up to celebrate their nation's culture and to honour his father's Second World…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from The Audio Long Read
On the trail with the hunters who believe shooting big game can save Africa’s wildlife
Cal Flynn's article explores the paradox of trophy hunting in Africa's Nyassa Special Reserve, where killing wild animals generates revenue that funds conservation efforts. Through firsthand observation of a buffalo hunt and interviews with conservancy director Derek Littleton, Flynn examines how hunting income sustains anti-poaching operations and local communities. The piece questions whether this morally uncomfortable system can or should be replaced, given its apparent effectiveness.
From the archive: Putin, Trump, Ukraine: how Timothy Snyder became the leading interpreter of our dark times
This Guardian Long Read profiles Timothy Snyder, a Yale historian of Eastern Europe who became a prominent public intellectual through his warnings about Trump's authoritarian tendencies and his deep engagement with the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The piece examines his background, his controversial but often prescient predictions, and the tensions between his roles as academic historian and political activist. It also explores criticism from both the left and right about his rhetorical style and ideological positioning.
How to survive the information crisis: ‘We once talked about fake news – now reality itself feels fake’
Guardian Editor-in-Chief Katherine Viner argues that interconnected global crises — environmental, political, economic, and informational — are being driven and compounded by digital technology designed to fragment attention and stoke conflict. She contends that transparently funded, human-centered journalism serves as essential civic infrastructure to counter these forces. The Guardian's reader-supported model is presented as both a practical solution and a political act in defense of shared reality.
Stateside with Kai and Carter: Stacey Abrams on why gutting of the US Voting Rights Act is ‘evil’
Hosts Kai Wright and Carter Sherman of The Guardian's 'Stateside' podcast interview Stacey Abrams about the Supreme Court's gutting of the Voting Rights Act through Louisiana v. Calais. Abrams frames the ruling not as a partisan issue but as a move toward authoritarianism, arguing that while the decision is 'evil,' it has misread the moment and that determination — not optimism — must drive the response. She outlines strategies including court battles, voter registration, coalition building, and ultimately a new constitutional amendment affirming an explicit right to vote.
‘Lawrence is karma’: the gangster who became an icon of Modi’s India
This Guardian Long Read profiles Lawrence Bishnoi, India's most notorious gangster, who has orchestrated high-profile murders and international assassinations from inside a high-security prison. The article explores how Bishnoi rose from a privileged rural background through violent student politics to become a celebrity criminal icon in Modi's India, allegedly with links to the Indian government's covert operations targeting Sikh separatists abroad.