Decagon’s Playbook for Building Enterprise AI Applications
Decagon co-founders Jesse Zhang and Ashwin Srinivas discuss their shift to 90% open-source models for AI agents, explaining how they optimize for latency and task-specific performance over general intelligence. They argue that enterprise AI companies will thrive by building deep, verticalized products around business processes rather than becoming thin UI wrappers, and emphasize the importance of product-led development informed by forward-deployed teams working directly with customers.
Summary
Jesse Zhang and Ashwin Srinivas, co-founders of Decagon, discuss their journey building AI agents for enterprise customer support and operations. Initially using frontier models from OpenAI and Anthropic, they transitioned to 90% open-source models approximately one year prior to this conversation, driven primarily by latency requirements for their voice agents rather than cost considerations. They discovered that smaller, fine-tuned open-source models can outperform larger state-of-the-art models on specific tasks, achieving superior performance, lower latency, and reduced costs simultaneously.
The founders address the common misconception that open-source represents a downgrade. They argue this is a false tradeoff—when fine-tuned for specific tasks, smaller models actually outperform frontier models while being faster and cheaper. They maintain a research team specifically for model fine-tuning and have built internal tooling tightly coupled to their use cases, including custom evaluation frameworks that measure end-to-end system performance rather than just isolated task performance.
Regarding the app versus infrastructure company dichotomy, they argue that application companies will continue thriving because they solve real enterprise deployment challenges beyond model capability. These include encoding business logic, handling integrations, managing compliance and QA, and providing tools for continuous improvement. They note that even AGI would require databases, CRMs, and software infrastructure for agents to function effectively.
On forward deployment and agent PMs, they emphasize that these roles should "eat pain and excrete product"—converting customer learnings into scalable core product improvements rather than providing consulting services. Every forward-deployed engineer contributes to core product, and this approach differentiates them from competitors offering black-box solutions where customers depend entirely on FDEs for changes. They call their approach a "glass box" model providing transparency and control.
The founders discuss their evolution from customer support to an "AI concierge" vision—positioning AI agents as the front door handling reactive and proactive customer interactions across support, sales qualification, and operational workflows. This expansion became possible as models improved at following nuanced instructions rather than requiring tight constraints. They built their agent to follow business processes generically rather than customer support specifically.
On go-to-market strategy, they emphasize being sales-led while remaining product-driven. They spend significant founder time on sales (80% for one founder) and have built strong early sales teams from non-traditional backgrounds including Ivy League athletes. They navigate complex enterprise deals by helping customers understand the entire deployment journey, from model risk governance through testing and rollout. They recently converted a Sierra customer who preferred their glass-box, productized approach over Sierra's FDE-dependent black-box model.
They note that international expansion has accelerated due to widespread AI awareness and improved language capabilities, though they remain selective about markets and ensure adequate resource investment. They expect consolidation in both geographic markets and verticals, with horizontal platforms winning rather than pure vertical solutions.
On the jobs debate, they argue AI kills jobs but not careers. Their customers typically expand support availability when costs drop rather than reducing headcount, creating latent demand. They've observed BPO employees transitioning to other roles rather than being laid off. They anticipate future value will come from AI-enabled revenue-generating use cases rather than just cost-cutting.
On hiring, they note that despite AI productivity tools, they continue aggressive hiring because competitors have access to the same tools. Everyone uses AI to build more, requiring matched investment to maintain relative velocity. They haven't seen the "one-person unicorn" narrative play out in practice.
The founders discuss using AI personally—Jesse built context-capturing agents that monitor business developments (hires, deals, challenges) to provide informed decision-making support. They note frontier models are good at brainstorming but struggle without proper context. On X versus LinkedIn presence, they found X valuable for timeline-setting and broader ecosystem influence despite being primarily a customer acquisition channel through secondary effects like media coverage.
About this episode
Sarah Wang and Kimberly Tan are joined by Jesse Zhang and Ashwin Sreenivas, co-founders of Decagon, to discuss the evolution of enterprise AI agents, why the company increasingly relies on open-source models, and how it is helping some of the world’s largest companies deploy AI in production. Decagon has become one of the fastest-growing AI companies by building agents that automate customer support, sales, and operational workflows. Jesse, Decagon’s CEO, and Ashwin, its president, explain how the company is building enterprise AI at scale. They unpack why Decagon moved most of its inference to open-source models, how latency, evaluation, and fine-tuning shape production AI systems, and why enterprise AI requires far more than simply plugging into frontier models. The conversation also explores forward-deployed engineering, enterprise sales, AI’s impact on jobs, and why application companies will continue to thrive alongside the foundation model labs.
Key Insights
- Decagon shifted to 90% open-source models primarily for latency optimization in voice agents rather than cost reduction, discovering that smaller fine-tuned models outperform frontier models on specific tasks across all three dimensions: performance, speed, and cost.
- The founders argue the open-source versus frontier model tradeoff is a false dichotomy—fine-tuning smaller models for specific tasks yields superior performance compared to general-purpose larger models, contradicting the common narrative that smaller means worse.
- Enterprise application companies will survive AGI because they solve deployment problems beyond model capability, including business logic encoding, system integrations, compliance management, and continuous improvement infrastructure that models alone cannot provide.
- Forward-deployed engineers should function to "eat pain and excrete product," converting customer learnings into scalable core product rather than delivering consulting services, distinguishing between product-led scaling and consulting-dependent models.
- Decagon built Agent Operating Procedures (AOPs) in plain text rather than code after discovering forward-deployed work showed this dramatically improved customer implementation efficiency, exemplifying how FD teams identify product improvements.
- Duet Autopilot, an AI agent that reviews conversations, identifies trends, creates model variants, and recommends improvements, only became possible when frontier models' reasoning capabilities improved substantially, demonstrating product possibilities emerging from model capability gains.
- The founders' conversation analysis reveals that as models improved at following nuanced instructions, they expanded from rigid customer support tasks to flexible business processes, enabling applications in sales qualification and operational workflows.
- Decagon converted a Sierra customer to their platform specifically because Sierra's black-box FDE-dependent model created drag over time, whereas Decagon's glass-box productized approach enabled customers to build seven new journeys in a month versus three in a year on the competitor platform.
- Despite AI productivity tools, Decagon continues aggressive hiring because competitors have identical access to AI tools, creating a collective action problem where everyone builds more, requiring matched investment to preserve relative velocity.
- The founders observed that most enterprise customers expanded support availability when AI reduced costs rather than laying off staff, with BPO employees transitioning to other roles, supporting the thesis that AI kills specific jobs but not careers.
- Jesse Zhang built personal context-capturing agents that monitor hiring, deals, and challenges to provide informed decision-making input, finding that frontier models excel at brainstorming but require proper business context to add value.
- The founders found X valuable for setting the broader timeline of industry conversation and generating secondary effects (media coverage, investor attention) despite direct attribution being difficult, distinct from LinkedIn's customer acquisition function.
Topics
Transcript
An AI agent should just be the front door of your business. And every interaction, whether it's like reactive or proactive with a customer, should be handled by AI. This narrative dominated the first half of 2026, which is that anthropic, open AI, they're the last startups. They're going to take over everything. Even once you have AGI, agents are going to need somewhere to store work and pull information from and reason about things. I don't think software as a whole in any meaningful way is going away. Unfortunately, the Frontier labs, they do have small models, but you can't really control them in the way that you want. So today, 90% of our workflow is on open source.…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from The a16z Show
Why Companies Are Becoming a Series of Loops | Anish Acharya on Lenny’s Podcast
Anish Acharya, a16z general partner and former founder, discusses how AI is transforming company building through 'loops'—automated processes where AI handles repetitive work while humans provide judgment and new ideas. He argues fears about an AI-induced permanent underclass are overblown, and that the real opportunity lies in consumer products focused on human connection, creativity, and ambition rather than just productivity.
What It Takes to Build a Startup | Andrew Chen & Matt Perault
Andrew Chen discusses A16Z's Speedrun program, which invests in earliest-stage startups (typically 2-3 person teams working from kitchen tables) and explores how regulatory complexity and policy decisions impact where founders choose to build companies. Chen emphasizes that early-stage founders lack time and resources to engage with policymakers, creating a representation gap where "little tech" voices are absent from policy discussions.
How AI Is Rewriting the Power Law of Venture Capital
A16Z partners discuss how AI is fundamentally reshaping venture capital dynamics, creating more extreme power law distributions where capital directly compounds competitive advantages. They argue that venture capital—particularly in frontier AI—should become a core allocation for most institutional investors, and that portfolio construction, access, and position sizing now matter more than ever.
Who Grades the AI Models? | Ben Horowitz & Rayan Krishnan
VALS, an independent AI evaluation company, addresses the gap where public benchmarks fail to accurately measure model capabilities—evidenced by Meta's Llama 4 underperforming on private benchmarks while excelling on public ones. The podcast discusses how third-party evaluators are essential for both labs seeking credible performance proof and enterprises needing ROI justification for AI spending, while also exploring the role of standardized evaluations in policy and geopolitical AI governance.
OpenAI Researchers on the Future of Mathematical Reasoning
OpenAI researchers discuss how AI models are making progress on long-standing mathematical problems by combining literature knowledge, executing complex proofs with precision, and exploring multiple approaches without human cognitive biases. They present case studies in sphere packing, coding theory, and group theory, arguing that AI's ability to persist through difficult problems and leverage symmetry properties is fundamentally changing what mathematics gets solved and how it's practiced.