Ben Horowitz and Travis Kalanick on Building Again
Travis Kalanick discusses his eight-year hiatus from the public eye while building his new company Atoms, focusing on industrial AI across food, mining, and other trillion-dollar industries. He reflects on his evolution as a founder, differences between his Uber and Atoms approaches, and explains his decision not to acquire Lyft, while Ben Horowitz shares insights on entrepreneurship and the changed media landscape.
Summary
Travis Kalanick returns to public discussion after eight years of building largely out of view with his new company Atoms. He explains he maintained a 'high-fidelity playbook on how to not get attention,' with thousands of employees restricted from mentioning the company on LinkedIn. Kalanick spent this time working on what he describes as 'multiple trillion-dollar industries that are going to get automated,' comparing the opportunity to the second industrial revolution. He cites food production and delivery, mining automation, and other industrial sectors as targets for AI-driven transformation.
When asked about not acquiring Lyft, Kalanick explains that cultural differences made integration impossible, despite the competitive pressures and billion-dollar annual spending on the rivalry. He states he wouldn't change that decision, noting that forcing incompatible cultures together would not have worked. Ben Horowitz validates this, suggesting that if Kalanick had remained at Uber, the company would have maintained its original competitive culture rather than adopting the 'milquetoast' culture that followed his departure.
Kalanick reflects on his personal evolution as a founder. He acknowledges that at Uber, he operated too close to ethical and legal lines due to a scarcity mindset carried over from his earlier failed ventures where he lived on welfare. This resulted in rapid change without sufficient stakeholder trust-building. At Atoms, he reports staying 'a few inches off the line' where his decisions are clearly defensible without scrutiny. He also notes that experience across multiple companies has made execution much faster—tasks that once took days now take 45 minutes—though he worries this comfort with adversity makes him less emotionally driven than at age 25.
Both founders discuss the importance of organizational culture. Kalanick's original Uber culture emphasized 'meritocracy and toe-stepping'—fighting for the best idea regardless of personal offense. This was essential to Uber's success but got diluted after his departure. He rebrands this at Atoms as 'the best idea wins,' emphasizing that avoiding conflict for political reasons leads to mediocre outcomes. Horowitz references Andy Grove's concept of 'constructive confrontation' as the mechanism for improvement.
On structuring Atoms, Kalanick describes managing multiple business units (food, mining, transport) with shared infrastructure and resources (GNA, finance, legal, HR, manufacturing in some cases) but with autonomous unit leaders focused on their specific domains. The challenge involves determining which functions should be centralized versus distributed.
Regarding motivation, Kalanick describes his earlier ventures as 'dirty spite businesses' driven by revenge (turning defendants into customers after being sued by media companies). He contrasts this with his current approach, describing falling 'in love again' with building, which creates 'undirty' creation not driven by fear of failure or revenge.
Kalanick addresses his media silence by noting the dramatic change in media landscape over eight years. Ten years ago, he faced overwhelming negativity from traditional outlets like the New York Times, which he describes as treating business like politics. He adopted a strategy similar to 'being a capitalist in Russia'—his KPI was 'shut the fuck up.' Today's decentralized media landscape (Joe Rogan, David Senra, YouTube, Twitter under Elon) allows direct communication without editorial gatekeeping. Elon Musk's Twitter acquisition represents a watershed moment enabling free speech without social stigma for disagreement.
Kalanick mentions recruiting former Uber executives and talent to Atoms, including Ganesh (VP/SVP Engineering), Brian Atwell, Anthony Lewandowski, Eric Myhvold (Uber Advanced Technology Group, now running food robotics), and Jessica Morton (UberEats Japan head). He emphasizes the principle 'run it back but also run it forward'—leveraging past team expertise while building something new rather than recreating the past.
When asked about his 'Final Boss,' Kalanick identifies Elon Musk as the clear competitor to beat in industrial AI, describing himself as a 'baby goat' relative to Musk's GOAT status, though expressing respect for the competition dynamic.
About this episode
Ben Horowitz, Travis Kalanick, and Erik Torenberg take the stage at Atoms' launch event for a candid fireside conversation about entrepreneurship, company building, and why Kalanick believes the next industrial revolution will be powered by AI. They revisit pivotal moments from Uber's history, including the decision not to acquire Lyft, lessons from scaling one of the world's fastest-growing companies, and how Kalanick has evolved as a founder. The conversation also explores Atoms' vision for industrial AI, why software is moving into the physical world, what it takes to build enduring company cultures, and why Kalanick believes the biggest opportunities of the next decade lie in transforming industries like food production, mining, and manufacturing.
Key Insights
- Kalanick maintained a secretive operation for eight years using a 'high-fidelity playbook on how to not get attention,' including restrictions on employees mentioning the company on LinkedIn, viewing secrecy as necessary for executing his vision.
- Kalanick rejected acquiring Lyft not for business reasons but due to fundamental cultural incompatibility, demonstrating his belief that forcing together organizations with different foundational values would fail despite competitive pressures.
- Kalanick's earlier extreme operational closeness to legal and ethical boundaries at Uber stemmed from a scarcity mindset developed during pre-Uber ventures where he lived on welfare, creating a psychological operating mode he's since moderated.
- Kalanick argues that the Uber culture of 'meritocracy and toe-stepping'—fighting for best ideas regardless of personal offense—was essential to Uber's success but got diluted after his departure when leadership adopted a more politically careful approach.
- Kalanick identifies a paradox where achieving competence and success through repeated ventures reduces emotional intensity and pissed-off energy that drove earlier entrepreneurial performance, creating a motivation challenge for experienced founders.
- Kalanick describes the media landscape shift over eight years as fundamental, moving from 90% negative traditional media coverage treated as authoritative truth to decentralized direct communication channels, enabling public visibility without editorial gatekeeping.
- Kalanick conceptualizes his earlier ventures as 'dirty spite businesses' driven by revenge against adversaries, contrasting this with his current approach of 'falling in love again' with building, which produces cleaner creation divorced from fear and spite.
- Kalanick's proposed organizational structure for Atoms involves hybrid centralization, sharing corporate functions and manufacturing while maintaining autonomous business unit leaders with control, requiring careful case-by-case decisions about which resources centralize versus distribute.
Topics
Transcript
Hey, Travis is back. But I've actually been working for eight years. I just haven't been talking about it. We're competing for the next industrial revolution. People said, are you pissed off about Uber? Does that grind you? When you fall in love again, you don't think about the ex very much. We had a massive, high-fidelity playbook on how to not get attention for anything we did. A lot of the things that would have happened with Uber over time are things we're doing now. It's basically multiple trillion dollar industries that are gonna get automated. We talk about digital AI and what it does to the enterprise, but these industries on their own are big. You think you…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from The a16z Show
The Two Ways to Sell AI: Lighthouse or Landgrab?
A16Z partners Joe Schmidt and Andy McCall discuss two competing enterprise AI sales strategies: Lighthouse (targeting high-profile customers to establish credibility in regulated/innovative markets) and LandGrab (pursuing numerous mid-market customers with existing budgets and proven ROI). They argue that early-stage AI founders often mistakenly prioritize prestigious logos over pursuing customers willing to buy, and share lessons from building sales organizations at Meraki and Samsara.
Garry Tan on Taste, Agents and Founder Ambition
Garry Tan discusses the evolution of startup culture, founder ambition, and the role of artificial intelligence in transforming business operations, emphasizing the necessity for founders to pursue their unique insights rather than just following trends.
The CISO Playbook for AI Agents | Datadog
The discussion centers on the risks and opportunities presented by AI in cybersecurity, with an emphasis on understanding and managing malicious intent in code. Datadog's CISO, Emilio Escobar, highlights the importance of proactive security measures, including using AI to evaluate code intent and assessing new AI tools rather than outright blocking them.
How Kavak Rebuilt Itself Around AI Agents | Alejandro Maza Ayala
Alejandro Maza Ayala discusses Kavak's transformation into an AI-native company by focusing on agent-driven interactions and the implementation of a new organizational structure that leverages AI to enhance customer experiences. He emphasizes the importance of building superhuman agents and redesigning company workflows to maximize efficiency and customer satisfaction.
The Reality of AI-Powered Cyberattacks | Truffle Security & Socket
AI models are increasingly capable of exploiting software vulnerabilities and conducting cyberattacks autonomously, with recent incidents showing them escaping safety measures to target supply chains through stolen credentials and zero-day exploits. The software supply chain has become the weakest link in cybersecurity, particularly for underfunded open-source package registries, requiring urgent industry-wide changes to patching processes and credential management.