Sunday Pick: The Data Center Next Door with Dr. Jacoby Wilson | from TED Tech

The episode opens with host Sherelle Dorsey framing data centers as the physical infrastructure of the AI economy, noting that these facilities — windowless, unmanned, and resource-intensive — are increasingly being sited in or near residential communities with little transparency or community input. The episode is the first in a four-part TED Tech series examining the real-world consequences of AI infrastructure expansion.

The episode centers on Prince George's County, Maryland — a majority Black, relatively affluent community — where county officials approved plans to convert a 90-acre former mall site into a massive data center complex without meaningful community engagement. Residents responded with a petition garnering over 22,500 signatures, rallies, and ultimately the production of a community-authored counter-report called 'The People's Report,' developed in partnership with the NAACP and researchers including Dr. Wilson.

Dr. Wilson explains that data centers create what he calls 'digital sacrifice zones,' exposing nearby residents to air pollutants from gas turbines (particulate matter, VOCs, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide), thermal and chemical water pollution, and increased energy costs. He notes that data centers receive corporate subsidies while also burdening local ratepayers, creating what he calls 'double welfare' for corporations at the expense of residents already dealing with energy poverty.

Dr. Wilson connects data center siting to the broader environmental justice and civil rights framework, arguing that the same historic patterns of redlining, zoning discrimination, and exclusion from decision-making that shaped industrial pollution now govern where data centers are placed. He points out that NDAs signed by local officials with data center companies undermine democratic representation and transparency.

The People's Report was developed through listening sessions, community surveys, and collaboration with frontline organizations to fill gaps left by the county's official task force report, which residents felt obscured the true environmental and social costs. Among the community concerns captured were fears about surveillance and a 'Big Brother' monitoring state, anxieties about AI-driven job loss, and skepticism about promised economic benefits — particularly since data centers employ very few people in their operational phase.

Dr. Wilson critiques the standard industry playbook of leading with job creation promises, arguing these are often temporary construction jobs that don't stay in the community, and that community benefits agreements tend to deliver only 'turkeys and trinkets' rather than meaningful economic or intergenerational wealth opportunities. He uses the analogy of fracking pipeline workers — including his own father — whose wages left the local economy entirely.

For communities currently facing data center proposals, Dr. Wilson recommends speaking with local officials, pursuing moratoriums, developing data center ordinances covering size restrictions, setback distances, water use, renewable energy requirements, and tax subsidy reform, and embedding protective language in comprehensive city or county master plans. He also emphasizes holding planning commissions accountable, as much of the lack of transparency originates there.

Dr. Wilson closes on an optimistic note, arguing that data center opposition is a rare 'bridge issue' that crosses racial, class, religious, and political lines, and that communities across the country are already winning these fights — making it a powerful organizing tool for civic engagement.