Should You Buy the B&T TP9?
The reviewer tests the B&T TP9 suppressed submachine gun at various distances from 10 to 100 yards, finding it accurate at shorter ranges but losing precision at 100 yards. Despite its appealing appearance, the reviewer concludes it's like a Ferrari without performance.
Summary
The review focuses on range testing of the B&T TP9 suppressed submachine gun, with the reviewer noting they'd prefer an MP7 but it's unavailable to civilians. Starting at 10 yards, the weapon performs exceptionally well with the first three shots landing in the A box and the second group achieving approximately 1.5 inches. At 25 yards, the performance remains excellent with rounds 'stacking' in tight groups. Moving to 50 yards shows some degradation with shots spread between the triangle, A box, and C box areas. The critical failure point comes at 100 yards where accuracy becomes unacceptable. The reviewer acknowledges uncertainty about 9mm effectiveness at longer ranges but expresses clear disappointment with the 100-yard performance. The final assessment is particularly harsh, comparing the TP9 to 'a Ferrari without the performance,' suggesting that while it may look appealing, it fails to deliver where it counts most.
Key Insights
- The reviewer states they really want an MP7 but can't get one, settling for the B&T TP9 instead
- At 10 yards, the first three shots all landed in the A box with the second group measuring about 1.5 inches
- At 25 yards, the reviewer observes they are 'stacking rounds' with very tight groupings
- The reviewer expresses uncertainty about what damage a 9mm round would do past 50 yards
- The reviewer concludes the TP9 is 'kind of like a Ferrari without the performance' due to its poor 100-yard accuracy
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] Talking about the B&T TP9 suppressed. I think it looks [music] pretty cool. What I really want is an MP7, but we can't get them. B&T TP9, 10 yards. First three, all in the A box. Second three, you're looking at about a 1 and 1/2 inch group. It works. I'm just going to mark these. Let's run back to 25. Well, I'll be damned. We're stacking rounds. Bam, bam, bam. We're accurate to [0:31] 25. Let's hit the 50. Got one right at the triangle, the other one in the A box, the other one in the C [music] box. I don't know what a 9 mil will do to you past 50 yards, but let's go toโฆ
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Shawn Ryan Show
He Called Kash Patel The Weakest Man Alive
The speaker makes critical allegations about Kash Patel, characterizing him as weak and questioning his associations. The speaker also details claims about Kash Patel's manager Ali Abdelaziz, including alleged post-9/11 arrest on passport fraud charges and subsequent FBI informant status.
Do You Believe the Charlie Kirk 30-06 Theory?! ๐ณ
A discussion questioning the "Charlie Kirk 30-06 theory" where speakers express skepticism about the narrative while introducing claims about pentagram involvement and demonic elements in unspecified events.
Bud Light Turned On Dustin Poirier?! ๐ณ
The speaker critiques Bud Light's decision to drop sponsorship of Dustin Poirier following an incident where he got drunk on a plane and attempted to fight a black cop. The speaker argues that while Poirier made a mistake, Bud Light should have offered support rather than abandonment, and criticizes the brand for hypocritically distancing itself after the controversy.
He Needs a Friend Named Jason...๐
Two individuals review the SIG 300 Blackout Rattler rifle, highlighting its features including a collapsible stock, flip-up irons, SIG optic, flashlight, and suppressor. One person expresses inability to afford shooting 300 Blackout ammunition and humorously requests that SIG provide subsonic ammo for testing.
Sean Strickland vs Candace Owens?! ๐ฎโ๐จ
Two speakers debate Candace Owens' credibility and approach to political commentary. One argues she undermines movements by mixing conspiracy theories with facts, while the other defends her investigative questioning and suggests they should meet to discuss their disagreements.