How Do Biker Gangs Get Revenge? 😳
A former biker gang member recounts a retaliatory attack on rivals who had jumped four or five of their members. The crew tracked down three of the attackers at a bar, cut phone lines, and beat them severely, resulting in broken legs and lost teeth. The speaker describes it as operating freely due to a code of silence among bikers, bar owners, and patrons.
Summary
In this short clip, a former biker gang member describes a revenge attack carried out after four or five of their members were jumped by approximately 15 rival gang members. Following a group meeting the next day, they assembled a crew and began searching for the attackers.
They received a tip from a contact inside a bar that three of the rival gang members were present. The crew immediately mobilized, employing tactical methods they had learned — cutting phone lines to prevent calls to police, covering both the front and back doors, and entering with weapons including sap gloves and a ball-peen hammer.
The speaker describes being first through the door, fueled by adrenaline and testosterone, and cornering the rivals before they could react. The beating was severe enough that ambulances were required, with victims suffering broken legs and knocked-out teeth. The speaker notes that no charges were ever pressed because the rival bikers could not report the attack without implicating themselves, and bar owners and patrons maintained silence. He describes this environment as 'free reign' and frames the incident as a formative experience in his biker gang life.
Key Insights
- The speaker describes a structured, organized response to gang violence — including a formal meeting and crew assembly — suggesting biker gang retaliation follows deliberate protocols rather than impulsive acts.
- The crew used tactical measures such as cutting phone lines and covering both entrances to prevent escape or calls to police, indicating experienced planning in conducting violent retaliations.
- The speaker claims he was not drinking or using substances during the attack, attributing his heightened state entirely to testosterone and adrenaline, framing the violence as driven by loyalty rather than intoxication.
- The speaker asserts that rival bikers could not press charges after being attacked because doing so would expose their own gang activities, creating a mutual deterrence from law enforcement involvement.
- Bar owners and patrons maintained complete silence during the police investigation, which the speaker describes as 'free reign' — indicating a broader community culture of non-cooperation with authorities in biker-related incidents.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] about four or five guys got jumped by about 15 guys. We had a meeting the next day. We put a crew together and we went out looking for these guys. We got a phone call from a friend of ours that was in a bar and said, "Hey, there's three of these guys in here." And then we said, "Okay, that's where we're going." And that's when the fellows showed me about cutting the phone lines in the back coming through the front door and back door keeping it covered. You got the sap plugs on and the ballpeen hammer knocked their teeth out of their mouth here. I'm not partying doing anything like that. So, I'm completely…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Shawn Ryan Show
How Your Brain Can Turn Against You 😳
The speaker discusses how human intelligence, our greatest gift, can paradoxically become our enemy when turned inward destructively. Using the tragic example of an Indian television anchor who took her own life, he illustrates how people suffer by using their minds against themselves rather than for their wellbeing.
He Chased a Nobel Prize to Prove His Dad Wrong 😳
A scientist describes his personal motivation to win a Nobel Prize to prove his father wrong, and explains how he designed a revolutionary telescope that detects microwave radiation from the early universe to understand the conditions immediately following the Big Bang.
This Is Why Nobody Believes the Moon Landing 😳
A discussion about why public distrust in government leads to moon landing conspiracy theories. A scientist argues that evidence for the moon landing is strong and that scientific skepticism should focus on testing claims rather than assuming government deception by default.
He Thought 20 Minutes Passed… It Was 4.5 Hours 🤯
A speaker describes an intense experiential event lasting 4.5 hours where they lost their sense of individual identity and experienced profound bliss, discovering states of consciousness they had no prior context for and that later proved to have verifiable connections to real-world events.
What’s Really Going On in Antarctica? 😳
A conversation about Antarctica's unique characteristics and research infrastructure, touching on its extreme isolation, difficulty of access for workers, and astronomical observation facilities at the South Pole. The speakers discuss the continent's otherworldly nature and compare it to fictional alien worlds.