China Can Build Warships 350x Faster 🤯
The speaker, Palmer, argues that China's shipbuilding capacity dwarfs that of the United States by 350 times. He also highlights China's rapid cruise missile production capabilities. A key argument is that China's commercial shipbuilding capacity is legitimately comparable to military capacity because Chinese law mandates all commercial vessels meet military standards.
Summary
In this short clip, the speaker Palmer makes a series of claims about China's overwhelming military-industrial advantages over the United States, particularly in the domain of naval shipbuilding and cruise missile production.
Palmer opens by asserting that China excels at manufacturing — producing goods quickly and cheaply. He specifically claims that China has automated cruise missile production facilities capable of producing more cruise missiles in a single week than the entire United States produces in a year, suggesting a massive asymmetry in munitions stockpiling capacity.
The conversation then shifts to shipbuilding, where Palmer states that China can build ships far faster than the U.S. He poses the question of how much greater China's shipbuilding capacity is, and after a guess of 20 times, reveals the figure is 350 times greater. He anticipates a common counterargument — that the comparison is unfair because China's figure includes commercial shipbuilding — and preemptively rejects it by pointing out that Chinese law requires all commercial vessels to be built to military standards, effectively making the entire commercial fleet a dual-use military asset.
Key Insights
- Palmer claims China has automated cruise missile production facilities capable of producing more cruise missiles in a single week than the entire United States produces in a year.
- Palmer argues that China's shipbuilding capacity is 350 times greater than that of the United States, far exceeding an initial guess of 20 times.
- Palmer contends that in a naval conflict in the Pacific, China's superior shipbuilding capacity would allow it to replace destroyed vessels far faster than the U.S. could.
- Palmer acknowledges the counterargument that comparing all of China's shipbuilding (including commercial) to the U.S. is unfair, but directly refutes it.
- Palmer asserts that Chinese law requires all commercial vessels to meet military standards, making China's commercial shipbuilding capacity legitimately count as a military asset.
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] China definitely has the technology in terms of manufacturing prowess. They know how to make stuff fast. They know how to make it cheap. They have automated cruise missile production facilities that are capable of turning out more cruise missiles in a week than the entire United States turns out in a year. China has more shipbuilding capacity than us. They can build ships a lot faster than us. If we start blowing up boats in the Pacific, they're going to be able to build more. How much more shipbuilding capacity do you think they have? >> 20 [music] times. >> It's 350 times. >> 300 >> 350 times more shipbuilding capacity than the United States. People will try…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Shawn Ryan Show
He Called Kash Patel The Weakest Man Alive
The speaker makes critical allegations about Kash Patel, characterizing him as weak and questioning his associations. The speaker also details claims about Kash Patel's manager Ali Abdelaziz, including alleged post-9/11 arrest on passport fraud charges and subsequent FBI informant status.
Do You Believe the Charlie Kirk 30-06 Theory?! 😳
A discussion questioning the "Charlie Kirk 30-06 theory" where speakers express skepticism about the narrative while introducing claims about pentagram involvement and demonic elements in unspecified events.
Bud Light Turned On Dustin Poirier?! 😳
The speaker critiques Bud Light's decision to drop sponsorship of Dustin Poirier following an incident where he got drunk on a plane and attempted to fight a black cop. The speaker argues that while Poirier made a mistake, Bud Light should have offered support rather than abandonment, and criticizes the brand for hypocritically distancing itself after the controversy.
He Needs a Friend Named Jason...😂
Two individuals review the SIG 300 Blackout Rattler rifle, highlighting its features including a collapsible stock, flip-up irons, SIG optic, flashlight, and suppressor. One person expresses inability to afford shooting 300 Blackout ammunition and humorously requests that SIG provide subsonic ammo for testing.
Sean Strickland vs Candace Owens?! 😮💨
Two speakers debate Candace Owens' credibility and approach to political commentary. One argues she undermines movements by mixing conspiracy theories with facts, while the other defends her investigative questioning and suggests they should meet to discuss their disagreements.