Army Sniper Questions Why We Went to War
A military veteran questions the official 9/11 narrative and U.S. response, pointing out that America didn't target Saudi Arabia despite most hijackers being Saudi nationals, while expressing skepticism about whether fighters in Afghanistan caves could have orchestrated such a sophisticated attack.
Summary
An Army sniper shares his perspective on the inconsistencies in America's response to 9/11 and questions the official narrative about who was responsible for the attacks. He points out that despite most of the hijackers being Saudi nationals, the U.S. never invaded Saudi Arabia, which he attributes to their control over oil resources. Instead, he notes that the U.S. government facilitated the evacuation of the Bin Laden family and other Saudi nationals to safety immediately after the attacks. The veteran then contrasts this with America's decision to invade Afghanistan and Iraq instead. Drawing from his direct combat experience in Afghanistan, he expresses doubt that the fighters he encountered in caves possessed the sophistication and capability to execute what he describes as 'one of the greatest heists of all time,' referring to the complex coordinated attack involving flying planes into buildings. His firsthand experience fighting these opponents led him to conclude that while they were competent fighters, they lacked the advanced tactical capabilities that would have been required for such an elaborate operation.
Key Insights
- The veteran argues that the U.S. avoided targeting Saudi Arabia after 9/11 because they controlled too much oil, despite most hijackers being Saudi nationals
- He claims the U.S. government flew the Bin Laden family and other Saudis to safety immediately after 9/11
- Based on his combat experience, the veteran expresses skepticism that fighters in Afghanistan caves could have orchestrated such a sophisticated attack
- He describes the 9/11 attacks as 'one of the greatest heists of all time' in terms of tactical complexity
- The veteran characterizes the Afghan fighters he encountered as 'good, but not' capable of the advanced tactics required for the plane hijackings
Topics
Transcript
[0:00] We never went to Saudi Arabia after 9/11. You know, we didn't go there. They controlled too much oil, regardless if most of the hijackers were from Saudi. We didn't touch them. We flew the Bin Laden family out in the beginning after 9/11 happened. We put them on planes and flew them to safety. We flew Saudis out to safety. >> [music] >> But, we went to Afghanistan and Iraq. And from my experience on in Afghanistan, I just don't some dudes in caves did all that. They were not that great when I fought them. They were good, but not pulling off one of the greatest heists of all times of [0:30] >> [music] >> the tactics…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Shawn Ryan Show
He Called Kash Patel The Weakest Man Alive
The speaker makes critical allegations about Kash Patel, characterizing him as weak and questioning his associations. The speaker also details claims about Kash Patel's manager Ali Abdelaziz, including alleged post-9/11 arrest on passport fraud charges and subsequent FBI informant status.
Do You Believe the Charlie Kirk 30-06 Theory?! 😳
A discussion questioning the "Charlie Kirk 30-06 theory" where speakers express skepticism about the narrative while introducing claims about pentagram involvement and demonic elements in unspecified events.
Bud Light Turned On Dustin Poirier?! 😳
The speaker critiques Bud Light's decision to drop sponsorship of Dustin Poirier following an incident where he got drunk on a plane and attempted to fight a black cop. The speaker argues that while Poirier made a mistake, Bud Light should have offered support rather than abandonment, and criticizes the brand for hypocritically distancing itself after the controversy.
He Needs a Friend Named Jason...😂
Two individuals review the SIG 300 Blackout Rattler rifle, highlighting its features including a collapsible stock, flip-up irons, SIG optic, flashlight, and suppressor. One person expresses inability to afford shooting 300 Blackout ammunition and humorously requests that SIG provide subsonic ammo for testing.
Sean Strickland vs Candace Owens?! 😮💨
Two speakers debate Candace Owens' credibility and approach to political commentary. One argues she undermines movements by mixing conspiracy theories with facts, while the other defends her investigative questioning and suggests they should meet to discuss their disagreements.