Nosara Civic Association opens up about everything from Pelada evictions to the Nosara Corridor +++
Representatives from the Nosara Civic Association (NCA) join a podcast to address misconceptions about their role in community issues, including the Pelada evictions and a constitutional court case. They also announce major progress on the Nosara Wildlife Corridor, which has secured 35 new acres in perpetuity, with a goal of reaching 1,000 total protected acres. The conversation emphasizes the NCA's identity as a volunteer-run environmental nonprofit, not a government or enforcement body.
Summary
The episode opens with a lighthearted conversation about dangerous traffic spots in Nosara before transitioning into a substantive interview with NCA representatives. The host, Rich, invites the guests to address the most pressing and challenging issues facing the organization over the past several months.
A major theme is the public misunderstanding of NCA's scope and mandate. The guests explain that NCA is a volunteer-run, nonprofit environmental organization focused on conservation — not a municipality or government enforcement body. They note that whenever NCA posts about one project, they are frequently criticized for not addressing unrelated community issues, such as roads, schools, or policing. They use this as an invitation for community members to either join NCA committees or seek out the specific organizations responsible for those other issues.
The Pelada eviction controversy is addressed directly. The guests clarify that NCA has spent significant time and money working on a regulatory framework that would allow families in good standing to remain in the refuge — the opposite of evicting people. They state that SINAC and the judicial court system are the relevant authorities in these cases, not NCA, and firmly deny any connection to developers or material gain from the evictions.
The guests also address an ongoing legal challenge involving claims that NCA holds land that should revert to public use. They explain that courts have ruled against these claims three times already, and that the constitutional court's latest ruling simply instructs the municipality to conduct a due diligence process — it does not implicate NCA directly. They express confidence in their legal standing and emphasize that the corridor program involves private landowners, not NCA-held land.
The Nosara Wildlife Corridor is presented as a landmark achievement. A study found that 82% of Nosara has forest coverage, but the health of that jungle — not just tree canopy — is what matters for water recharge, biodiversity, and long-term sustainability. NCA has formalized a conservation agreement with Finca Montaña, adding 35 acres in perpetuity to a protected map. The goal is to reach 1,000 acres, up from the current 652. They have a pipeline of 20 development projects they are approaching to join the corridor program. Individual landowners can also participate if they meet minimum area requirements.
Water scarcity in Guanacaste is highlighted as a critical motivator. The guests note that government water infrastructure plans do not include Nosara, making local jungle recharge areas essential. They argue that 95% of investment in Nosara is private, placing the burden of environmental stewardship on residents themselves.
Other topics include the upcoming Nosara Fun run (a 20-21km half marathon supporting 30 scholarship students at the Mar Academy), the Somos Nosara community beautification project near the airport and town center (which drew nearly 400 participants), and a new community park on a 5-hectare property near the Nosara building that will host events and serve as a cultural gathering space bridging expat and local communities.
On the dog-on-beach issue, the guests clarify this is a SINAC enforcement matter, not NCA policy, and note that new fines of approximately $2,000 have been passed into law. They also discuss the long-awaited plan regulador (regulatory plan), with the guests estimating it could take 3+ years despite optimistic projections, noting that no coastal area in Costa Rica has successfully completed one in over 40 years.
The episode closes with the host issuing an open invitation for anyone criticizing NCA to participate in a moderated roundtable, which the guests enthusiastically accept. The NCA board is described as five Costa Ricans and two permanent foreign residents, all unpaid volunteers, with board composition rotating every two years.
Key Insights
- NCA representatives clarify they are actively working to create a legal framework that allows families in good standing to remain in the Pelada refuge — directly contradicting the public narrative that NCA is trying to evict people from the beach.
- The guests state that courts have ruled against land-recovery claims targeting NCA three times already, and that the constitutional court's latest ruling only instructs the municipality to begin a due diligence process — NCA has not even been contacted by the municipality yet.
- A study found 82% forest coverage in Nosara, but the guests argue that tree canopy alone is misleading — the health of the jungle ecosystem, including its ability to recharge aquifers, is what actually matters for long-term sustainability.
- The Nosara Wildlife Corridor has secured its first formal conservation agreement with Finca Montaña, adding 35 acres protected in perpetuity via inscription in the national register — meaning the conservation status survives land sales or inheritance.
- The guests argue that government water infrastructure plans for Guanacaste do not include Nosara at all, making locally protected jungle recharge areas the only realistic solution to long-term water security for the community.
- NCA's board consists of five Costa Ricans and two permanent foreign residents, all unpaid volunteers, with board composition rotating every two years — contradicting public perceptions of a well-funded organization with hidden agendas.
- The guests describe Nosara as a potentially unique global model for conservation — a coastal community with 82% forest coverage that emerged partly by accident from a failed golf course project and turtle protection efforts, now backed by private investment in nature.
- New SINAC legislation has passed fines of approximately $2,000 for dogs on protected beaches, and the guests emphasize this is a SINAC enforcement matter entirely unrelated to NCA.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access