OnlyFans Has Quietly Changed Society… Here’s How | Raj Shamani Clips
Raj Shamani and his guest discuss how OnlyFans and social media have altered social dynamics, commodifying relationships and rewarding performative behavior over genuine self-development. They debate whether figures like Andrew Tate attract followers by exploiting male insecurity and using a victim-enemy psychological framework. The conversation explores whether these trends represent a loud minority or a genuinely growing societal shift.
Summary
The conversation opens with an observation that OnlyFans has effectively turned women into commodities and men into customers, with both genders increasingly performing desirability rather than working on their internal selves. Women are noted to perform sexuality for independence or income, while men perform wealth and status through cars, watches, and luxury goods — both driven by the same underlying logic of impression management over identity development.
The speakers debate the actual scale of the OnlyFans phenomenon. One argues it is likely a noticeable but proportionally small minority driving the platform's billions in transactions. The other counters with figures: over 300 million registered users and 3.2 million content creators, suggesting the numbers are too large to dismiss. They compare OnlyFans to how Spotify replaced CDs or Netflix replaced movie theaters — potentially a format shift rather than a net increase in demand for adult content. However, Raj argues that convenience and cheap dopamine have likely expanded the overall user base, not just displaced it.
The discussion broadens to social media algorithms rewarding extreme and sensational behavior, creating a dynamic where a loud 1% is broadcast to the other 99%, who then mistake that minority for the norm. The concern raised is that as more people believe impression management matters more than internal growth, the behavior compounds — one becomes two, two becomes four.
The conversation then focuses on why figures like Andrew Tate and Dan Bilzerian attract massive followings. One speaker suggests it stems from deep insecurity in young men, along with 'dark triad' personality types who admire openly antisocial behavior. Raj offers a more structural explanation: men are socially conditioned from childhood to earn respect through external achievements — career, body, car, house — and those who haven't yet achieved these things (typically under 35) are drawn to figures who both reflect that value system and vocally acknowledge male frustrations, making followers feel 'finally someone gets us.'
The guest adds that Tate's message specifically requires a listener who has been hurt or feels cheated — someone in significant pain who needs a framework to make sense of it. Unlike Bilzerian, who simply displayed wealth, Tate has an actual ideological message that resonates with men in distress. Raj then outlines the cult-building formula these figures use: identify widespread problems, label followers as victims, and designate an enemy (in this case, women) — a framework he notes is also central to political movements. The conversation concludes with agreement that nothing unifies people more effectively than a common enemy, and that this psychological mechanism is being deliberately exploited.
Key Insights
- Raj Shamani argues that both men and women are increasingly performing desirability externally — women through sexuality, men through displays of wealth like watches and cars — instead of working on their internal identity, and that social media platforms are accelerating this trend.
- The guest contends that OnlyFans may not represent a net growth in the adult content market, but rather a format substitution similar to how Spotify replaced CDs — the same demand shifted to a more convenient platform rather than genuinely expanding.
- Raj argues that because online access is cheaper, easier, and more convenient than physical alternatives like strip clubs or brothels, the percentage of people engaging with adult content has likely grown from roughly 5 in 100 to 10 in 100, driven by the addictive nature of low-effort dopamine.
- Raj outlines the psychological formula used by figures like Andrew Tate to build blind followings: identify problems a large group experiences, frame those people as victims, assign a specific enemy (women) as the cause, and then provide no real solution — just continuous rhetoric that sustains the following.
- Raj argues that young men under 35 who have not yet achieved socially visible markers of success — career, body, wealth — are drawn to figures like Tate because those figures both embody the external achievements men are conditioned to pursue and vocally validate the frustrations men are otherwise told not to express.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access