Badminton Rankings Explained | Lakshya Sen | Raj Shamani Clips
Badminton player Lakshya Sen explains how the BWF world ranking system works, including weekly updates, best-10-tournament counting, and seeding advantages. He also reflects on what separates him (ranked #11) from the world number one — primarily consistency across tournaments. He discusses how rankings affect draw placements and tournament strategy.
Summary
Lakshya Sen begins by explaining that badminton world rankings change every Tuesday, meaning players face constant pressure throughout the season. Rankings are based on a rolling system where points from the same week of the previous year expire — so if a player reached the final of a tournament last year, they must at least match that result this year or lose those points. He gives the example of potentially losing 6,000-7,000 points in a single week if they underperform relative to their previous year's result.
He then describes the structure of how rankings are calculated: players compete in roughly 18-20 tournaments per season, but only their best 10 results count toward their ranking. This means first-round exits don't necessarily damage a player's ranking if they have better results elsewhere. He notes that injuries can significantly impact rankings since missing tournaments means fewer opportunities to accumulate points.
Sen explains the seeding advantage: the top 8 ranked players in a tournament are seeded and cannot face each other before the quarterfinals. This means a lower-ranked player like himself (ranked 11th at the time) could be drawn against the world number one in the very first round, as happened to him at the All England. Conversely, at the Olympics, because he wasn't highly ranked, he was placed in a tough group with the world number three, forcing him to beat a top player just to advance, while better-seeded players like Viktor Axelsen had easier group stages and faced their toughest opponents only from the quarterfinals onward.
When asked what the world number one has that he currently lacks, Sen identifies consistency — performing well across all major tournaments and peaking at the right times. He acknowledges that getting into the top 10 is one challenge, but staying there requires sustained performance. He also discusses the importance of body management as players age, noting that physical demands differ at 21 versus 24 versus 28. He concludes by describing how top players strategically plan their tournament calendars, accepting that they won't be 100% fresh at every event, and identifying which tournaments to peak for.
Key Insights
- Lakshya Sen explains that ranking points expire on a week-by-week basis relative to the same tournament the previous year — if he reached the final last year, he must reach the final again this year or lose up to 6,000-7,000 points that week.
- Sen describes how only a player's best 10 tournament results out of roughly 18-20 played count toward their ranking, meaning first-round exits don't necessarily hurt a player who has stronger results elsewhere in the season.
- Sen recounts that at the All England, being ranked 11th meant he was drawn against the world number one in the very first round, illustrating how lower rankings expose players to tougher early matchups.
- Sen contrasts his Olympics experience — where he had to beat the world number three in the group stage — with Viktor Axelsen's, who had an easier group and only faced his first tough match at the quarterfinals due to his higher seeding.
- When asked what separates him from the world number one, Sen identifies consistency across all major tournaments and the ability to peak at the right time as the primary gap, noting that staying in the top rankings is even harder than reaching them.
Topics
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to Access