LinkedIn ci vuole tutti controllori

LinkedIn is implementing a new feature that adds a button below posts enabling users to flag content identified as AI-generated ('AI slop' or low-quality artificial intelligence content). The platform's stated goal is to reduce the proliferation of poor-quality AI-generated posts flooding the platform. However, the speaker expresses skepticism about whether this is the right solution to the problem. The core concern is that while placing a reporting button gives individual readers agency to decide if content is legitimate, it creates several problematic scenarios. First, the button could be abused through coordinated campaigns where competitors or bad actors report legitimate content from rivals regardless of its actual quality. Second, the speaker highlights a critical ambiguity: in today's professional landscape, much content is hybrid in nature—created by humans but enhanced, refined, or processed through AI tools. The speaker notes that personally, nearly everything they create now involves AI in some way, and this is common among many professionals. This raises the fundamental question: where should the line be drawn? At what point does content become 'AI-generated' and reportable versus legitimately human work that incorporates AI assistance? The speaker concludes by questioning whether creating a system that makes all users 'gatekeepers' responsible for monitoring and reporting others' content is genuinely beneficial or problematic.