Got accepted into a top accelerator. It was the wrong move for my business. Lost 4 months of momentum.
A founder with $9K MRR shared their regret about joining a top accelerator, claiming it slowed their growth by 60% and cost them 4 months of momentum for $125K and 7% equity. The community largely agreed that accelerators are mismatched for revenue-generating businesses, being optimized for pre-revenue companies seeking VC funding.
Summary
The original poster described their experience with a top accelerator program after having already achieved $9K monthly recurring revenue. They detailed how the 3-month program disrupted their momentum through relocation, irrelevant workshops focused on pre-revenue companies, and extensive demo day preparation that pulled them away from product development. Their growth rate dropped from $1K/month before the program to just $133/month during it. The community response was largely sympathetic and validating. Several commenters noted that the founder was already achieving what most accelerator graduates hope to accomplish by demo day, with one calling accelerators 'fundraising bootcamps' rather than product development programs. There was broad agreement that accelerators are optimized for a specific founder profile - pre-revenue companies seeking VC funding - and create a mismatch for bootstrapped, revenue-generating businesses. Some commenters suggested the experience might provide long-term educational value, while others focused on the structural problems with accelerator models. One dissenting voice suggested the founder may have been too rigid and closed to learning opportunities during the program.
About this episode
Applied on a whim. Got in. $125K investment for 7% equity. 3-month program. Demo day at the end. The prestige alone felt worth it. Here's what actually happened during those 3 months. Week 1-2: orientation, team dinners, office setup. I moved cities temporarily. Disrupted everything. Week 3-8: workshops, mentor meetings, pitch practice. 3-4 hours of scheduled activities per day. Felt productive. Wasn't. Most of the advice was for pre-revenue companies. I was at $9K MRR. The "find product-m...
Key Insights
- The founder's MRR growth dropped from $1K/month before the accelerator to $133/month during the program, demonstrating quantifiable momentum loss
- One commenter argued that accelerators are 'fundraising bootcamps' optimized for demo day and investor intros rather than growing products with paying customers
- Multiple commenters noted the founder was already achieving what most accelerator graduates hope to accomplish by demo day, having reached $9K MRR
- A commenter suggested that accelerators are 'fishing for the big one' and the $125K investment doesn't mean much to them compared to finding a breakout company
- One dissenting commenter argued the founder may have been 'too rigid in their ways' and not open enough to learning during the program
Topics
Transcript
[Original Post] (score: 56, upvote ratio: 97%, by u/Live_Young831) Title: Got accepted into a top accelerator. It was the wrong move for my business. Lost 4 months of momentum. Applied on a whim. Got in. $125K investment for 7% equity. 3-month program. Demo day at the end. The prestige alone felt worth it. Here's what actually happened during those 3 months. Week 1-2: orientation, team dinners, office setup. I moved cities temporarily. Disrupted everything. Week 3-8: workshops, mentor meetings, pitch practice. 3-4 hours of scheduled activities per day. Felt productive. Wasn't. Most of the advice was for pre-revenue companies. I was at $9K MRR. The "find product-market fit" sessions weren't relevant. The "how to pitch investors" sessions assumed I wanted…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from r/SaaS
4 months after my "$44k to $90k" post, 5 things that actually moved the needle (50k EUR YTD update)
A bootstrapped SaaS founder shares a detailed 4-month update on growing from ~€33k to €50k YTD gross volume across two AI products, outlining five specific tactical changes that drove growth. The post is highly upvoted with unanimous approval, and the only comment is the founder himself noting a humorous coincidence in his MRR number.
crossed 200k revenue on my dictation app, but honestly most of it was from lifetime deal not MRR
The founder of Blip AI, a voice-to-text app, shares hitting $200K in total revenue but is transparent that the majority came from lifetime deals via AppSumo rather than recurring subscription revenue. The post is a candid reflection on the difference between cash events and sustainable business models. Community engagement is minimal, with only one comment asking about the lifetime deal platform used.
End of AI Slop
r/SaaS moderators announced implementation of captcha and user vetting systems to combat AI bots and spam posts. The community strongly supported the initiative, with users expressing frustration over AI-generated content and fake promotional posts.
Building ordnar: Step by step to profitable app portfolio
A solo developer shared their work on 'ordnar', a project management tool designed to help indie builders validate ideas before building full products. The discussion received minimal engagement, with only one brief positive comment.
SaaS is not dying
A Reddit discussion defending SaaS viability against claims it's dying, where the original poster argued that convenience and habit drive continued SaaS adoption despite AI competition. The community largely agreed while acknowledging AI will increase competition and raise quality standards rather than kill SaaS entirely.