Ben LammWhy We're Living in a Biological Singularity With Ben Lamm | MOONSHOTS Live #297
Ben Lamm, founder of Colossal, discusses his company's work in de-extinction and synthetic biology, including woolly mammoth resurrection, artificial wombs for mammals, and using AI to understand genotype-to-phenotype relationships. He emphasizes that lack of domain expertise can be an advantage, and that technological breakthroughs at the intersection of synthetic biology, AI, and computing will enable designing organisms within a decade.
Summary
Ben Lamm founded Colossal, now valued at over $10 billion, to pursue de-extinction and synthetic biology despite having no prior background in the field. He argues that his lack of expertise was actually advantageous, allowing him to hire smarter experts and ask unconventional questions that sometimes lead to novel insights. His approach centers on surrounding himself with world-class talent, including Harvard's George Church, described as the father of synthetic biology.
The company is pursuing multiple projects beyond the famous woolly mammoth revival, including dire wolves, Tasmanian tigers (thylacines), and artificial womb technology for mammalian gestation. Lamm explains that within 24 months, Colossal expects to achieve fully extrauterine mammalian birth from conception through delivery without a surrogate mother. He also discusses working on 16 different mammoth genetic lines simultaneously, with plans to eventually restore tens of thousands of mammoths to Arctic tundra ecosystems.
A major focus is using AI and large language models as infrastructure middleware to solve problems in comparative genomics, literature analysis, and experimental design. However, Lamm notes that raw genome sequences alone are insufficient—massive datasets of comparative genomes across evolutionary lineages are needed. He founded AstroMech to develop what he calls "inflectional models" that understand how genomes evolved and why certain traits did or didn't evolve in related species.
The company has made dramatic progress in gene editing capabilities, moving from 20 edits per organism to consistently performing over 300 edits with 90% efficiency, and currently testing designs with 1,000 edits. Lamm predicts that within a decade, the field will reach a point where organisms can be designed through computational tools—essentially "CAD for biology"—allowing rapid synthesis of desired phenotypes.
On ethics, Lamm describes a thoughtful approach involving consultation with indigenous peoples, conservation groups, and consideration of species' ecological roles, educational value, and cultural significance. He emphasizes that Colossal will never apply de-extinction technology to humans, following advice from cryonics pioneer Bob Nelson about avoiding FDA code freeze situations. He positions the work as solving a critical problem: humanity is losing approximately half of all biodiversity in the next 25 years, requiring massive federal and international investment in biorepositories and species backup infrastructure, similar to how digital information is backed up.
Key Insights
- Lamm claims that lacking domain expertise in synthetic biology was actually an advantage because it allowed him to hire smarter experts and ask unconventional questions that sometimes lead to novel insights—10% of the time his naive questions generate ideas the experts hadn't considered.
- Colossal has achieved exponential progress in gene editing capability, moving from 20 edits to consistently performing over 300 edits with 90% efficiency, and currently testing thousand-edit designs, with tripling of base edits occurring roughly annually.
- Lamm predicts that within less than 10 years, the technology will reach a point where organisms can be designed computationally (CAD for biology), allowing anyone to specify desired phenotypes and synthesize them, including ability to engineer phenotypes like size, coat color, and body structure across different animal clades.
- Lamm states that Colossal expects to achieve fully extrauterine mammalian birth—complete gestation outside a womb from conception to birth without a surrogate mother—within 24 months, and is working on 16 different mammoth genetic lines simultaneously with plans for tens of thousands of mammoths.
- Lamm argues that raw genomic sequences are insufficient for organism design; instead, comparative genomic datasets across millions of samples at the clade level, combined with understanding when and why genes evolved in different species, are more valuable than any individual model for predicting phenotypes.
Topics
Transcript
[0:04] I got a little scared backstage when Palmer said, "There was a message on the screen saying I shouldn't say that ." I thought, "For God's sake, whatever it is, it's not about Colossal." Please don't say that. So, I remember at Abundance 360 last March, right before you came out, Elon was there. And you said, "Yes, I want a tame woolly mammoth." How are you doing with this project? Oh, we get these kinds of requests all the time. Yeah, yeah, but there [0:35] was a great episode, I think, of " American Dad" or "Family Guy," where they explained... Did you see that? I don't know if you saw this. But they explained CRISPR there, and…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Peter H. Diamandis
Dr. Alex Wissner-Gross's roadmap for how digital twins of your own cells.
Dr. Wissner-Gross proposes that digital twins of cells, trained on large biological datasets similar to how large language models are trained, will enable exhaustive computational searches to discover cures for diseases by finding intervention pathways from diseased to healthy cell states.
Emad Mostaque, Peter Diamandis and DB2 admit even they can't keep up with the model releases anymore
Emad Mostaque and Peter Diamandis express frustration with the rapid pace of AI model releases, stating they cannot keep up with the continuous stream of new models like 5.5, 5, and Astra. Despite acknowledging progress is good, they humorously convey exhaustion from the relentless pace of AI advancement.
Palmer Luckey on why Chinese open-source models are a non-starter for weapons systems
Palmer Luckey explains that Anduril's AI systems for weapons are fundamentally different from open-source consumer models, focusing on processing raw sensor data rather than text-based language models. He argues that specialized defense AI requires deterministic, auditable systems that have little commercial application, positioning Anduril as a decade ahead in this domain.
DB2 on what a source inside the US-China AI talks says Beijing is actually afraid of.
In US-China AI negotiations at the UN, the US delegation's primary concern is preventing domestic panic that could slow American AI development, while China's underlying fear is regime survival and preventing the Great Firewall from being penetrated by AI technology. Understanding China's existential anxiety about government stability contextualizes their negotiating positions.
Why All The Spaceports Are In Red States
The transcript discusses how federal land availability in red states, particularly in the American Southwest, will likely become locations for new federal spaceports following a White House executive order. The speaker explains that western states like Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona, which contain substantial federally-owned land, are leading candidates for space launch facilities, while private spaceports are expected to develop on the Gulf Coast.