Daniel Yergin Sees a 'Different World' Emerging After the Hormuz Crisis
Energy expert Daniel Yergin joins the Odd Lots podcast on April 17, 2026 to discuss the geopolitical and economic fallout from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz during a U.S.-Iran war. Yergin argues this event represents the worst supply chain shock in history and will permanently alter global energy security thinking, accelerate structural shifts toward diversification, and usher in an inherently more inflationary world. He also discusses AI's growing role in energy demand, the resilience of U.S. LNG and shale production, and the enabling role of drone technology in modern conflict.
Summary
Recorded on April 17, 2026, this episode of the Odd Lots podcast features Daniel Yergin, Vice Chairman of S&P Global and author of 'The Prize' and 'The New Map,' discussing the sweeping consequences of the Strait of Hormuz closure during a U.S.-Iran war. Hosts Tracy Alloway and Joe Weisenthal set the stage by noting the market appears to be moving past the acute phase of the conflict, while acknowledging that the structural consequences will be long-lasting regardless of how the ceasefire resolves.
Yergin describes the Strait of Hormuz closure as 'the mother of all supply chain shocks,' a scenario that had been war-gamed for decades but was never expected to actually materialize. He notes a striking divergence during the crisis between futures markets, which were pricing in a swift resolution, and physical markets, where real dislocations were playing out — particularly in Asia, where flight cancellations, LPG shortages for cooking, and supply disruptions were acute. He attributes this gap to the fact that futures traders respond to statements and sentiment, whereas physical market participants face real operational consequences.
At CERAWeek, the annual energy industry gathering in Houston held during the height of the crisis, Yergin reports that CEOs were deeply focused on employee safety, logistics, supply disruptions, and demand destruction. A key revelation from the crisis was how much the global economy depends on Gulf exports beyond oil and gas — including fertilizer, petrochemicals, sulfur, and helium critical to Taiwan's semiconductor industry. This underscored how deeply integrated Gulf economies have become with global supply chains.
A major theme of the episode is the intersection of AI and energy. Yergin notes that before the war, CERAWeek was set to be dominated by discussions about powering AI data centers, with tech giants like Google and Microsoft participating alongside energy companies. He argues that AI represents roughly half of U.S. GDP growth and that energy security has in some ways shifted from oil and gas to electricity — though the war snapped that back into focus. Tech companies are rapidly building internal energy competencies, hiring from oil, gas, and power industries, and investing in technologies like small modular reactors and fusion. Utility executives report demand growth of 5–8% annually after years of flat demand, creating pressure on supply chains for transformers and electricians.
Yergin explains that the closure of the Strait was enabled in large part by Iran's drone capabilities, which allowed a country with a relatively small economy to assert control over a chokepoint that carries 20% of the world's oil and gas. He draws a parallel to Ukraine serving as the 'beta test' for modern drone warfare, arguing that the Gulf crisis demonstrates how smaller powers can now create credible threats to global infrastructure. This has broad implications for energy security planning, defense spending, and the durability of international trust.
On the question of recovery, Yergin cautions that even if peace breaks out, oil markets may take a couple of months to rebalance, and the broader disruption to petrochemicals, refineries, and the overall supply chain could take up to two-thirds of a year to clear. He also addresses inflation, agreeing with the hosts that the shift from efficiency-optimized global supply chains toward security, resilience, and localization is inherently cost-adding and inflationary — reversing decades of globalization-driven cost reduction.
Yergin touches on the future of renewables, noting that wind and solar are increasingly being framed as tools of energy diversification and security rather than purely climate solutions. He also discusses U.S. LNG export capacity, which he sees as likely to grow significantly with Qatar partially sidelined, and U.S. shale production, which he views as durable for at least the next few decades, though not guaranteed indefinitely. He acknowledges the ESG rebrand toward 'infrastructure' investing as a way capital continues to flow into energy while sidestepping political baggage. The episode closes with a lighthearted discussion about the TV show Landman and a campaign to get Yergin a cameo in season three.
About this episode
<p>When it comes to the history of oil and energy, nobody is more famous or well respected than Daniel Yergin. He is the Vice Chairman of S&P Global, and the Pulitzer Prize winning author of both <em>The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power</em> and <em>The New Map: Energy, Climate, and the Clash of Nations</em>. So we had to get his insights on the war in Iran, and its historical significance. Yergin tells us that a "different world" will emerge from the crisis surrounding the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, regardless of the war's ultimate outcome. Iran's ability to control the Strait against a much stronger military is a demonstration that the balance of global power is changing, with profound ramifications for countries around the world. We discuss how different regions are being affected, and how it will change their calculus when it comes to energy security. We also talk about the AI industry's seemingly insatiable demand for electricity, and how this is rippling across the entire energy landscape.</p> <p>Read more:<br /><a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-04-21/top-oil-traders-warn-worst-of-demand-hit-from-war-is-yet-to-come?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=podcast&utm_campaign=odd_lots&utm_content=article">Oil Traders Warn of Recession Impact as Hormuz Hits Demand</a><br /><a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-04-21/china-aggressively-sold-oil-in-recent-weeks-mercuria-ceo-says?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=podcast&utm_campaign=odd_lots&utm_content=article">China Aggressively Sold Oil in Recent Weeks, Mercuria CEO Says</a></p> <p>Only <a href="http://bloomberg.com/">Bloomberg - Business News, Stock Markets, Finance, Breaking & World News</a> subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox each week, plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots?in_source=oddlotspodcast">bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots</a></p> <p><a href="http://bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots">Subscribe to the Odd Lots Newsletter</a><br /><strong>Join the conversation:</strong> <a href="https://discord.gg/oddlots">discord.gg/oddlots</a></p><p>See <a href="https://omnystudio.com/listener">omnystudio.com/listener</a> for privacy information.</p>
Key Insights
- Yergin argues the Strait of Hormuz closure was 'the mother of all supply chain shocks,' a scenario war-gamed for decades that people assumed would never actually happen — and that its occurrence has permanently changed how the world thinks about energy security.
- Yergin claims there was an unprecedented divergence between futures prices (which priced in a quick resolution) and physical/dated Brent prices (which reflected real dislocations), representing 'two different visions of the world' simultaneously.
- Yergin contends that the crisis revealed how underappreciated Gulf exports beyond oil are — including fertilizer, petrochemicals, sulfur, and helium critical to Taiwan's semiconductor industry — exposing the depth of global dependency on the region.
- Yergin argues that Iran's drone capabilities were the enabling factor that allowed a country with roughly half the GDP of Belgium to assert control over the world's most critical oil chokepoint, drawing a parallel to Ukraine as a 'beta test' for this new mode of warfare.
- Yergin claims that even after a ceasefire, oil markets could take a couple of months to rebalance and the broader supply chain disruption — including petrochemicals and refinery damage — could take as long as two-thirds of a year to fully clear.
- Yergin asserts that the global shift from efficiency-optimized supply chains toward security, resilience, and localization is inherently inflationary, reversing a decades-long trend of globalization-driven cost reduction.
- Yergin argues that AI's energy demands have driven a renaissance in nuclear investment, with major tech companies funding small modular reactors and fusion startups because they see nuclear as essential to meeting data center power needs.
- Yergin contends that Iran's ability to close the Strait — regardless of the war's outcome — introduces a new and durable risk premium into global energy markets, and that Gulf countries like Saudi Arabia will find Iranian toll collection over the Strait politically intolerable.
Topics
Transcript
So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need. Now, a global workforce of 300,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94% of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off. Deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business. IBM. More at adobe.com slash do that with Acrobat. Small businesses are the pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities, and drive growth. Chase for Business helps business owners like you…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Odd Lots
The Rise of Organized Retail Crime at Big Box Stores
Scott Glenn, VP of Asset Protection at Home Depot, discusses the rise of organized retail crime (ORC), explaining how it differs from opportunistic shoplifting, how stolen goods are fenced through online marketplaces, and the technological and legal challenges retailers face in combating sophisticated theft operations that often involve drugs, violence, and organized criminal networks.
Why Money Launderers Love $100 Bills
Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast interviews journalist Oliver Bullough about money laundering, exploring how $2-5 trillion annually is laundered globally through cash, trade-based schemes, and crypto. The discussion reveals that despite $200 billion spent annually on anti-money laundering compliance, criminals consistently outmaneuver regulations while governments continue printing high-denomination bills that enable criminal activity.
Why Laser Beams Are the Hottest New Tech in Defense
Colonel Wayne Sanders from Bloomberg Intelligence discusses directed energy weapons (lasers and high-powered microwaves) as emerging defense technologies that could reduce reliance on expensive munitions. The conversation covers how these systems work, their deployment challenges, supply chain constraints, and their role in a layered air defense strategy alongside traditional missile systems.
What's Behind the Big Surge in US Government Bond Yields
Economics professor Daryl Duffy explains that rising US Treasury yields are driven primarily by massive government debt issuance relative to limited investor demand, rather than inflation concerns. He discusses the Treasury's buyback program, the Fed's balance sheet challenges, and the structural constraints on both fiscal and monetary policy's ability to control yields.
Adam Posen Thinks Things Could Get Very 'Messy' for the Fed
Adam Posen discusses Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's Jackson Hole speech, giving it a B- grade while highlighting concerns about the Fed's inflation trajectory and Warsh's preference for discretionary policymaking over clear forward guidance. Posen argues the Fed was late to hike in 2022 and early to cut in 2023, and warns that without explicit commitment to bringing inflation down at a specific pace, markets and policymakers may face confusion about the Fed's true intentions.