Brad Setser on the US's Unusual Japanese Yen Intervention
Brad Setser explains the recent US-Japan yen intervention, discussing why East Asian currencies have weakened despite strong trade surpluses, the unusual use of euros in the intervention, and why Japan's fiscal position may be better than commonly perceived.
Summary
In this episode of the Odd Lots podcast, hosts Tracy Alloway and Joe Weisenthal interview Brad Setser, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, about the recent US Treasury intervention in the Japanese yen market. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's to-do list, which included "buy Japanese yen, JPY 5-10 billion," prompted discussion of why such intervention was deemed necessary.
Setser explains the broader context of currency weakness across East Asia. Despite record current account surpluses throughout the region—Korea's expected to reach $300-400 billion, Taiwan's doubling to 25-30% of GDP—currencies have weakened. South Korea experienced this paradox because rising equity markets hitting foreign concentration limits forced selling of Korean stocks, depressing the won despite good economic news. Taiwan's central bank actively engineered currency weakness through regulatory changes. China's currency appears undervalued by current account models. Japan, specifically, has a 5% current account surplus driven by investment income rather than trade, along with approximately $1.2 trillion in reserves and substantial foreign assets held by the Government Pension Fund Investment (GPIF).
The yen's weakness stems partly from the Bank of Japan's reluctance to raise interest rates despite inflation above 1%, its policy rate level. Setser outlines various reasons for this hesitation: the BOJ's desire to solidify inflation expectations after decades of deflation, concerns about banking system funding costs, and potential fiscal impacts. However, at 160 yen per dollar, the yen has reached historically extreme weakness—returning to 1960s levels in inflation-adjusted terms.
Regarding the intervention itself, Setser notes the unusual decision to sell euros rather than dollars, which he attributes to Secretary Bessent's background as a currency trader and desire to signal that this represents a view about the yen specifically, not the dollar's weakness. The intervention also utilized the Foreign and International Monetary Authorities Repo Facility (FIMA repo), a Fed facility established during the 2020 pandemic that allows foreign central banks to repo treasuries for dollars at a premium above market rates. This tool provides flexibility, allowing interventions without immediately selling treasuries into the market.
On the question of whether rate-based valuation models—Big Mac Index, behavioral equilibrium exchange rate models, current account models—still work, Setser argues they consistently show Asian currencies as undervalued, indicating that financial flows have pulled currencies far from fundamental measures.
Addressing Adam Posen's critique that currency intervention alone cannot sustain currency defense (citing the 1992 Bank of England example), Setser argues Japan differs because the BOJ appears likely to raise rates, especially if it does so in September. He contends that if the BOJ raises rates faster than the Federal Reserve going forward, the intervention can succeed. Additionally, Japan's unique position as holder of massive unhedged foreign assets through government institutions means that changing expectations about yen weakness could alter flows significantly without traditional repatriation patterns.
Finally, Setser addresses concerns about Japan's fiscal sustainability. While the 30-year Japanese yield has risen from 0.05% in 2016 to around 4% currently, Japan's primary balance (excluding interest payments) is now effectively flat—a significant improvement from previous years. Japan's primary balance compares favorably to the US, UK, and France. Critically, Japan's government holds massive foreign assets generating income, partially offsetting interest payments. Net debt levels have been falling, and the combination of higher nominal growth, improved primary balance, and government foreign asset holdings means Japan's debt dynamics are not necessarily unsustainable if nominal rates converge with inflation and the primary remains stable.
About this episode
<p>Last week, the US joined forces with Japan to try to stop the yen’s slide. It’s the first time the two sides have intervened in the Japanese currency in 15 years, and in many ways it was an unprecedented and unusual move, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent choosing to sell euros (as opposed to dollars) and the use of a little-known Federal Reserve repo facility. So why did the yen’s value drop so precipitously in the first place? And will this intervention be enough to stop it? Brad Setser, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, explains why the Bank of Japan initially refrained from raising rates, why East Asian currencies (not just the yen) have been so weak lately, the improving fiscal outlook for Japan, and what to look out for next.</p><p>See <a href="https://omnystudio.com/listener">omnystudio.com/listener</a> for privacy information.</p>
Key Insights
- East Asian currencies have weakened despite record current account surpluses because of structural hedging flows, foreign concentration limits forcing asset sales, and deliberate central bank policies rather than fundamental economic weakness
- The Bank of Japan has been reluctant to raise rates above 1% despite inflation above that level because it fears prematurely ending the inflationary psychology shift after decades of deflation and because rate increases would raise banking system funding costs
- The Treasury chose to sell euros rather than dollars in the yen intervention to signal this was specifically about yen weakness rather than dollar strength, and also used Fed FIMA repo facilities to allow flexible timing of actual treasury sales
- At 160 yen per dollar, the yen has reached historically extreme undervaluation levels comparable to the 1960s in inflation-adjusted terms, suggesting it has overshot its fundamental value
- Japan's government holds approximately $1.2 trillion in reserves and the GPIF manages $900 billion in foreign assets that generate substantial investment income annually, giving Japan unique firepower compared to other countries in defending its currency
- Japan's fiscal position has materially improved in recent years with the primary balance now essentially flat rather than in deficit, making Japan's fiscal trajectory more favorable than the United States' by multiple objective measures
- Japan's government receives $35-40 billion annually in interest income from foreign assets that doesn't normally hit the foreign exchange market because it compounds abroad, meaning intervention effects depend heavily on whether the government begins repatriating these earnings
- If the Bank of Japan raises rates in September and continues raising faster than the Federal Reserve, the yen intervention can succeed not merely from intervention itself but from fundamental rate differentials shifting in the yen's favor
Topics
Transcript
What if you could use AI to research your investment portfolio and ask, find profitable mid-cap energy companies with growing cash flow? Which AI infrastructure stocks appear undervalued? Or rank stock opportunities based on valuation, growth, and risk? With Interactive Brokers, you can connect ChatGPT or Claude to your investment portfolio to research investments, analyze your holdings, and uncover potential undervalued opportunities. AI accelerates the research. You can make every investment decision. Open and fund an interactive broker's account in minutes at ibkr.com slash invest. Restrictions apply. AI integrations provided by third parties. IBKR does not verify content generated by AI platforms. I can't do it today. I already have plans. Something came up. There are a million reasons to…
Full transcript available for MurmurCast members
Sign Up to AccessMore from Odd Lots
The Rise of Organized Retail Crime at Big Box Stores
Scott Glenn, VP of Asset Protection at Home Depot, discusses the rise of organized retail crime (ORC), explaining how it differs from opportunistic shoplifting, how stolen goods are fenced through online marketplaces, and the technological and legal challenges retailers face in combating sophisticated theft operations that often involve drugs, violence, and organized criminal networks.
Why Money Launderers Love $100 Bills
Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast interviews journalist Oliver Bullough about money laundering, exploring how $2-5 trillion annually is laundered globally through cash, trade-based schemes, and crypto. The discussion reveals that despite $200 billion spent annually on anti-money laundering compliance, criminals consistently outmaneuver regulations while governments continue printing high-denomination bills that enable criminal activity.
Why Laser Beams Are the Hottest New Tech in Defense
Colonel Wayne Sanders from Bloomberg Intelligence discusses directed energy weapons (lasers and high-powered microwaves) as emerging defense technologies that could reduce reliance on expensive munitions. The conversation covers how these systems work, their deployment challenges, supply chain constraints, and their role in a layered air defense strategy alongside traditional missile systems.
What's Behind the Big Surge in US Government Bond Yields
Economics professor Daryl Duffy explains that rising US Treasury yields are driven primarily by massive government debt issuance relative to limited investor demand, rather than inflation concerns. He discusses the Treasury's buyback program, the Fed's balance sheet challenges, and the structural constraints on both fiscal and monetary policy's ability to control yields.
Adam Posen Thinks Things Could Get Very 'Messy' for the Fed
Adam Posen discusses Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's Jackson Hole speech, giving it a B- grade while highlighting concerns about the Fed's inflation trajectory and Warsh's preference for discretionary policymaking over clear forward guidance. Posen argues the Fed was late to hike in 2022 and early to cut in 2023, and warns that without explicit commitment to bringing inflation down at a specific pace, markets and policymakers may face confusion about the Fed's true intentions.